Aikido Security vs Kondukto [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Aikido Security and Invicti are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Additionally, 100% of Aikido Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

Aikido Security

Read 9 Aikido Security reviews

7,724 Views
3,553 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kondukto [EOL]

Read 1 Kondukto [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Aikido Security

Kondukto [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Kondukto [EOL] and Aikido Security are competing security products. Data indicates Aikido Security has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and efficient support.

Features: Kondukto [EOL] provides effective vulnerability management and automation that streamlines processes. Aikido Security offers advanced threat detection and a robust analytic engine, which appeals to tech buyers seeking comprehensive security functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aikido Security ensures swift deployment and exceptional customer support, reducing integration time and complexity. Kondukto [EOL] has a moderate deployment process with adequate support.

Pricing and ROI: Kondukto [EOL] is budget-friendly with lower setup costs, suitable for smaller operations. Aikido Security, though more costly initially, provides long-term benefits due to its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aikido Security

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (24th), Container Security (23rd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (9th), Static Code Analysis (8th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (16th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th), DevSecOps (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)

Kondukto [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Tarunn Goswami

GEN AI Engineer at a educational organization with 51-200 employees

Security has shifted left and now catches vulnerabilities early in our development workflow

There are a few areas for improvement. The first is scan speed. For large repositories, initial scans can be slow. Incremental scanning helps, but full scans still take considerable time. The second thing is the false positive rate. While Auto-Triage is good, it is not perfect. Occasionally, genuine issues get filtered out and real false positives slip through. The third one is remediation guidance. Aikido Security tells you what is vulnerable, but sometimes the fix suggestions are generic. More specific, actionable remediation steps would save developer time. The fourth one is IDE integrations. It currently works best in CI/CD pipelines. A proper VS Code or JetBrains plugin for real-time scanning while coding would be a significant improvement. From a customer point of view, the following things could change. The first thing is documentation for custom rules. Aikido Security allows you to create custom scanning rules, but the documentation for this feature is surprisingly thin. I spent considerable time in community forums and with trial and error just to configure basic custom rules. Step-by-step guides with real-world examples would make this feature much more accessible. The second thing is better Slack and communication integrations. Currently, security alerts come through email and dashboard notifications, but our team lives in Slack. A more configurable Slack integration that sends contextual alerts directly to the relevant developer, not just a generic channel notification, would dramatically improve response time. The third one is historical trend reporting. While Aikido Security shows current vulnerability status well, generating historical reports showing security posture improvement over time is limited. For presenting security progress to management or stakeholders, better exportable trend reports would be very valuable.

Read full review

Mohamed Abdel-Hassanein

Co-Founder and Business Development at TeCrypt

Unified dashboard has simplified managing multiple scanners and improved vulnerability remediation

The best feature and biggest benefit of the product is the ability to manage different scanners from a single dashboard. Regarding analytics capability, Kondukto provides actionable insights into security needs because it performs all the work on the customer's behalf. It checks findings and vulnerabilities from different scanners, confirms that all findings are matched together, and makes it clear and confident that the final finding is truly a vulnerability requiring action. Regarding automation features, Kondukto is fully automated and fully integrated with a plug and play approach. In terms of integration with DevOps pipelines, the benefit is that Kondukto itself is not an integration tool. The DAST tool is integrated, and I can manage the scanner. The tool itself, whether it is DAST or SAST, will be integrated with DevOps and other tools like notification tools, SIEM, and SOC. The scanner tool itself will be managed under Kondukto, but Kondukto does not provide integration. There is no need because the scanner itself will integrate with other tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Aikido Security has positively impacted my organization because we feel more secure, we have a good monitoring system for vulnerabilities, and we are able to show our clients our security posture and the security posture of our internal systems."

"Aikido Security offers the best features including being very easy to use, allowing even a normal tech person with some hands-on experience to use this tool and clearly get the results they want."

"Aikido Security saved me several hours each week by automating vulnerability scanning and security checks, reducing the need for manual review and helping me focus on more development."

"Since switching to Aikido Security, I have noticed a positive impact on my team's productivity with measurable results, as we now have measurements."

"We were able to close 90% of issues with the help of Aikido Security tools, providing a return on investment."

"My advice to others looking into using Aikido Security is to get it as soon as possible; right now, it is a very good tool for a very good price, and you will see a return on investment in less than six months."

"My advice for others looking into using Aikido Security is that if the codebase and everything need to be audited and recorded in a single forum, and if they want a unified solution to scan both the code and the image, they can definitely use it."

"Aikido Security nests directly in our development workflow and it catches security issues before they reach production."

More Aikido Security pros

"Kondukto helps consolidate security findings by correlating them to minimize false positives and giving customers a complete and clear vision of high critical findings in an easy way."

Cons

"I think Aikido Security could be improved by addressing its Jira integration, which I feel needs a bit of work."

"There are a few areas for improvement. The first is scan speed; for large repositories, initial scans can be slow, and while incremental scanning helps, full scans still take considerable time."

"Regarding Aikido Security's AI accuracy and reliability of output, I think its AI capabilities are all right, but it can miss the point sometimes; it is good to have a fast and cheap overview, but I would not rely 100% on it."

"I think Aikido Security could be improved with more detailed remediation guidance, such as additional beginner-friendly tutorials and enhanced customization for alerts and reporting."

"I think Aikido Security could improve by reducing some pricing model. Pricing is quite high for a normal user, and if they can make it a little less, it will be much better."

"The accuracy of Aikido Security's output is still not very high, and there are a few features where they are still lacking behind regarding accuracy."

"However, there was one minor issue that I faced. When I had a UUID for an object in the code, Aikido Security was considering it as a secret key, which it was not."

"Aikido Security can be improved by addressing the lags in the UI and ensuring that updates can be given very quickly and rapidly."

"The primary concerns I have are that it is somewhat expensive, support would rate as seven, and there were licensing activation issues."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Aikido Security?

One area I think Aikido Security could improve is the depth of their reporting and remediation guidance; sometimes, the platform flags a vulnerability but the suggested fix lacks detail, requiring ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aikido Security?

My main use case for Aikido Security is to consolidate all our application security scanning into one platform, primarily to manage multiple tools more efficiently. I use it to scan our code for vu...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Aikido Security?

My advice for anyone considering Aikido Security is to proceed and try it as the onboarding process is straightforward and can be completed within a day. Start by connecting critical repositories a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Semgrep vs Aikido Security

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs Aikido Security

Compared 7% of the time

GitHub vs Aikido Security

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube vs Aikido Security

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Aikido Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Aikido Security Competitors

Snyk vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

DefectDojo vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

SonarQube vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Data Theorem API Secure vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Semgrep vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Kondukto [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aikido Security

November 2026

Download Aikido Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Kondukto [EOL] product report

Overview

Aikido Security is the no-nonsense platform that empowers developers by centralizing code-to-cloud security issues and providing rapid guidance for fixing vulnerabilities.

With over 6,000 teams utilizing its features, Aikido Security prioritizes effective security management by consolidating 11 comprehensive scans into one platform. This approach translates complex vulnerabilities into understandable insights, targeting non-enterprise SaaS businesses with engineering teams of 10-500 developers. It focuses on delivering security management without excessive costs or complexity through a product-led growth model.

What are the standout features of Aikido Security?

SAST: Secures code as it is written.
DAST: Monitors surfaces, dynamically tests for vulnerabilities with OWASP ZAP.
IaC: Detects infrastructure vulnerabilities.
CSPM: Real-time detection of cloud infrastructure risks.
Container Scanning: Assesses container environments for risky packages.
Secrets Detection: Identifies exposed API keys, passwords.
Open Source Dependencies: Analyzes dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
Open Source License: Maps and exports SBOMs to manage license risks.
Malware Detection: Protects from supply chain attacks.
Runtime Protection: Secures apps with an embedded firewall.
Custom Scans: Integrates with existing tools like SonarQube.

Why should you consider Aikido Security?

Easy Adoption: Setup takes less than 3 minutes with clear UX.
Cost Efficiency: Offers a comprehensive 9-in-1 solution at competitive pricing.
Accurate Results: Best false positive reduction in the market.

In industries like software development and cloud services, Aikido Security is implemented to provide clear insights, enabling teams to focus on rapid product growth while maintaining robust security. Its product-led growth strategy, including a freemium offering, allows developers to experience benefits firsthand without initial investment.

Aikido Security

Kondukto offers robust solutions designed for advanced security in software development. It centralizes vulnerability management, enhancing efficiency for teams and improving the security posture across projects.

As a comprehensive platform, Kondukto streamlines vulnerability management by integrating with existing development tools to automate and simplify processes. It informs users promptly about potential security threats, enabling swift risk mitigation. Kondukto caters to enterprises by providing essential insights and high adaptability in software environments.

What are the core features of Kondukto?

Integration Compatibility: Seamlessly aligns with popular development tools, ensuring a smooth workflow.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort by automating repetitive tasks related to security checks.
Risk Assessment: Offers detailed reports on vulnerabilities, assisting in prioritizing security fixes.
Custom Alerts: Configurable notifications to keep teams informed about significant security developments.

Why consider Kondukto?

Efficiency Boost: Streamlined processes lead to faster threat identification and resolution.
Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring maintains a high level of security assurance.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprises with expanding needs.

Kondukto is utilized in industries like finance and healthcare, where data protection is crucial. Its implementation focuses on integrating within existing ecosystems to strengthen security protocols without disrupting workflow. By providing relevant insights, it aids businesses in maintaining compliance and managing risk effectively.

Invicti

Sample Customers

FinTech GoCardless ZIP CertifID HealthTech Dental Intelligence PE & Group Techstars Cronos Group Security Tech Human Security Tines HR Tech Simployer Recruitee Agency November Five Other Lighthouse (Hospitality Tech) Smokeball (LegalTech) Runna (B2C Tech) GEA Group (Manufacturing) Community fibre (Telecom) n8n (Software Development)

Trendyol, Ödeal

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, best DevSecOps vendors, and best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.