Akamai API Security vs Invicti comparison

Read 31 Invicti reviews

7,864 Views
1,101 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Akamai API Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Invicti and Akamai API Security are products in the cybersecurity domain, focusing on web and API security. Invicti is viewed favorably in terms of pricing and support, while Akamai API Security is known for its strong feature set.

Features: Invicti offers robust vulnerability scanning, clear reporting capabilities, and comprehensive web application assessments. Akamai API Security stands out with advanced threat detection, prevention tailored to API protection, and enhanced defense against sophisticated threats. Key difference lies in Invicti’s focus on web applications and Akamai's API specialization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti's model is praised for straightforward integration and effective customer support, enabling quicker adoption. Akamai API Security provides a scalable cloud-based deployment which is streamlined but may need more initial configuration. Akamai's responsive support is valuable for complex API environments.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti is noted for competitive setup cost and delivers substantial ROI with its comprehensive features and support. Akamai API Security may have a higher initial investment but offers ROI through specialized API security features, appealing to those safeguarding critical API infrastructure. Differences in initial costs reflect their focus on distinct security strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai API Security vs. Invicti Report (Updated: September 2026).

Akamai API Security vs. Invicti

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai API Security

Ranking in API Security

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Invicti

Ranking in API Security

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (16th), Container Security (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (14th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Akamai API Security is 5.8%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 3.9%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Akamai API Security	5.8%
Invicti	3.9%
Other	90.3%

API Security

Featured Reviews

Alark Singh

IT Specialist at Allianz

Advanced API defense has protected web channels and consistently reduced downtime and incident impact

Akamai API Security helps comply with DORA compliance in the Europe region, preventing any compliance issues. It helps demonstrate that the ISO understands the secured side is protected by Akamai API Security, ensuring that if any DOS attack is present, it will not occur or take the side down. Currently, no improvements are apparent. In the last few years, there was improvement as bot attacks have been addressed, with more focus now placed on bot attacks. At that time, there was a drawback, but Akamai API Security is improving day by day. Currently, no drawbacks are evident, and the product is good. Akamai API Security is delivering the best products every year.

Read full review

PrashantUppuluri

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection

A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The API part is effective."

"API throttling is the most valuable feature of Akamai API Security."

"Akamai API Security is preventing multiple issues, and the organization is doing well with Akamai API Security profits, which is good."

"The support from Akamai API Security is good, the employment and support are of excellent quality."

"What I already appreciate about Akamai API Security is that initially we were struggling with how to get this configured, but after that everything went smoothly."

"Akamai's support is impeccable, and its plug-and-play features are helpful."

"We have used the platform for deep-dive investigations that involved cyber crime and were happy with the performance."

"Akamai API Security has been a strong and reliable solution for securing my APIs, especially in terms of visibility and behavioral-based threat detection."

More Akamai API Security pros

"Netsparker has done an awesome job with its crawler, as it has found all of the links (also thanks to its good DOM parser)."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"It has improved the security of our code by scanning it and finding security defects."

"NetSparker is a very easy to use and understand product."

"I am impressed by the whole technology that they are using in this solution. It is really fast. When using netscan, the confirmation that it gives on the vulnerabilities is pretty cool. It is really easy to configure a scan in Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. It is also really easy to deploy."

"Netsparker has valuable features, including the ability to scan our website, an interactive approach, and security data integration."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"I see some areas for improvement in Akamai API Security because the adoption is not easy since it takes time to learn and configure."

"I believe Akamai API Security could be improved specifically in the integrations so that they can be executed more effectively with platforms such as a SIEM or SOAR, which would help me automate workflows for incident response."

"The challenge I found was with contextualization and how analytics are generated."

"However, there is one drawback regarding technical support. Akamai API Security makes back-end changes because a SaaS solution is being used; sometimes they inform about changes, and sometimes they do not, which impacts clients as a P1 or P2 incident."

"More features would be beneficial."

"The main challenges we had with Akamai API Security were how to set it up on the AWS cloud environment and how to access this portal."

"I think it would be good if they can integrate more with API gateways as this is currently limited."

"It would be beneficial to use machine learning and API throttling together to identify how the APIs are called and whether it's coming from the right person or the wrong person."

More Akamai API Security cons

"The scan performance can be improved upon."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"The scanning time, complexity, and authentication features of Invicti could be improved."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"The licensing model should be improved to be more cost-effective. There are URL restrictions that consume our license. Compared to other DAST solutions and task tools like WebInspect and Burp Enterprise, Invicti is very expensive. The solution’s scanning time is also very long compared to other DAST tools. It might be due to proof-based scanning."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."

"The proxy review, the use report views, the current use tool and the subset requests need some improvement. It was hard to understand how to use them."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a limit to the number of APIs we can use inside a bundle, and we have to pay extra if we exceed that limit."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai API Security?

Akamai API Security is not expensive.

What needs improvement with Akamai API Security?

One thing that really surprised me was how effective the behavioral-based detection is in identifying the anomalies that traditional rule-based systems might miss. It gives much better visibility i...

What is your primary use case for Akamai API Security?

Akamai API Security's main use case in my environment is to protect critical APIs that are exposed to the internet, especially for banking and financial applications. I primarily use it to secure A...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

Salt Security vs Akamai API Security

Comparisons

Compared 16% of the time

Cequence Security vs Akamai API Security

Compared 13% of the time

Traceable AI vs Akamai API Security

Compared 11% of the time

Data Theorem API Secure vs Akamai API Security

Compared 10% of the time

Wib’s Fusion Platform vs Akamai API Security

Compared 3% of the time

More Akamai API Security Competitors

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 8% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Download Akamai API Security product report

Akamai API Security

October 2026

Download Invicti product report

October 2026

Also Known As

Noname Security

Netsparker

Overview

Akamai API Security offers a comprehensive set of features designed to improve API security posture, including automated API discovery and anomaly detection, ensuring robust data protection and minimized response times.

Focused on safeguarding public-facing APIs, Akamai API Security provides full visibility into undocumented APIs and detects abnormal traffic patterns, minimizing unauthorized access and data exposure. Integration with tools like Bot Manager Premier and DDoS protection allows for enhanced security, making it effective in banking and financial sectors for handling sensitive data. Despite its strengths, there are areas for enhancement, such as policy tuning and integration with third-party tools. Users also seek simplified setup, AI-driven policy recommendations, and effective dashboards.

What are the key features of Akamai API Security?

Automated API Discovery: Identifies unlisted APIs for enhanced security.
Behavioral-based Anomaly Detection: Flags unusual traffic patterns to prevent unauthorized access.
Integration with WAF: Delivers unified security policies across platforms.
Bot and DDoS Protection Tools: Guards against malicious bots and DDoS threats.
Visibility and Traffic Monitoring: Enables detailed watch over API traffic to catch anomalies.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Akamai API Security?

Enhanced API Security: Ensures stronger protection across exposed endpoints.
Reduced Response Time: Quickly identifies and mitigates threats.
Unauthorized Data Exposure Prevention: Keeps sensitive data secure from breaches.
Improved Performance: Enhances the overall security and efficiency of APIs.

In industries like banking and finance, Akamai API Security effectively monitors sensitive customer data transmissions, enforcing rate limits and validating API schemas. It plays a crucial role in detecting credential abuse and excessive data requests, ensuring secure and legitimate access while enhancing API performance.

Akamai

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank