No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Akamai CloudTest vs Apache JMeter comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest
Ranking in Performance Testing Tools
13th
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Apache JMeter
Ranking in Performance Testing Tools
1st
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache JMeter is 9.1%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apache JMeter9.1%
Akamai CloudTest3.0%
Other87.9%
Performance Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring
Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.
TusharShankar - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager at Synechron
Performance testing has become central and reporting has provided clear insights for our teams
We do have command prompt related or CLI functionality with Apache JMeter, so it is easier. However, since it is open source, much work has not been put into the GUI part. The GUI could definitely be enhanced. One drawback which I can see when I compare it with other tools is the amount of cache that it uses, the memory that it uses. It becomes very difficult to work with when we have a lot of requests that need to be processed. Anything more than 10,000 requests becomes a bit of an unfavorable task when using Apache JMeter altogether. Otherwise, it does help anyone who is starting off with performance testing.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."
"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."
"The solution is very stable."
"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."
"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."
"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."
"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."
"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."
"It gives accurate results and recommendations that we can implement to enhance the performance of websites."
"The biggest thing I liked about it is that there is a huge user base out there, and being shareware and being Apache, if I have any question on how to get something done, I get 18 different answers. Out of those, there would be at least a few good approaches for what I was trying to do. So, the support system out there is most valuable."
"We are using it just for load testing. We are using its free version, and it is scalable."
"The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good."
"The distributed load testing is very good and the ramp-up, and when we come out with the right ramp-up plan, it can be converted into Apache JMeter script very well, accurately simulating how many of our transactions need to be triggered."
"It is easy to set up."
"It's an open-source tool, Apache JMeter, it's easy to customize and it provides an enormous amount of plugins, so based on the customer requirements we can customize our code and execute the test, and JMeter integrates well with Jenkins while the cloud offers CI/CD activity."
"Due to process automation, I don't have to prepare reports, making it the perfect solution."
 

Cons

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."
"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."
"The test clip should be more user-friendly."
"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."
"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."
"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."
"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."
"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."
"The user interface could be improved."
"There are issues with stability when running with multiple users because it consumes a lot of memory."
"The solution is not user-friendly, there is no framework for autocorrelation or parameterization."
"In future releases, it would be helpful if there was an integration with ALM Octane."
"Self-healing and page rendering for the end-users are not available in Apache JMeter."
"They should improve the solution on its UI front."
"The UI of the solution needs to be better. The UI takes up a lot of our bandwidth."
"Running JMeter in GUI mode uses a lot of memory, which means we need to switch to a non-GUI mode when using a heavy load."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."
"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."
"Running cost is very low."
"When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"
"JMeter is open source, so there are no licensing costs associated with it."
"Everything is included, and there are no additional costs."
"In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."
"Apache JMeter is a free tool."
"JMeter is open source and available free of charge."
"There are operational costs related to using Amazon Cloud, but the tool itself."
"Apache JMeter is an open-source solution, so it's free to use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Retailer
10%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise62
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache JMeter?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.
 

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest
JMeter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.