No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Compute Optimizer vs Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling
Ranking in Compute Service
4th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AWS Compute Optimizer
Ranking in Compute Service
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is 5.1%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Compute Optimizer is 2.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling5.1%
AWS Compute Optimizer2.3%
Other92.6%
Compute Service
 

Featured Reviews

Saurab Gnagurde - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Analyst | Aws Cloud Ops | Dev Ops | Fin Ops at Tata Consultancy
"Seamless Traffic Management and Server Health with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling"
The best feature I appreciate about Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is its health check functionality; when a server becomes unreachable or enters an unhealthy state, it automatically triggers an alert, and the load balancer responds by spinning up a new server, ensuring that traffic is distributed effectively. For predictive scaling capabilities in Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, I deploy all servers to the limit for a week to monitor CPU utilization, and I calculate the load trends to manage the minimum and maximum through time-based auto scaling. We are using CloudWatch, and have integrated it with various application performance monitoring tools such as Instana, AppDynamics, and Grafana. We set thresholds in these tools to alert us if CPU utilization exceeds 70%, allowing our dedicated team to rapidly respond to any issues. The main benefit of implementing Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is that service availability for end users reaches 99.99%, with effectively zero downtime. Even if multiple servers become unreachable, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling automatically spins up new servers to replace them, all without human intervention. We utilize two types of scaling policies: time-based and CPU-based. When our CPU utilization reaches 70%, Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling automatically adds a new server to handle the generated load.
Shady Mogawer - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Arabian Cement Company
Easy to manage, flexible, and has good scaling options
A partner company called Cloud40 helped us with the deployment. It took a couple of weeks for the deployment to happen. The steps we took for the deployment process included research and information planning about what we wanted to do while moving from physical to the cloud. We have used all the hardware and other resources available to make sure of the connection.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The monitoring tool is helpful."
"With the ability to set up rules based on demand, network, or traffic, the service offers a necessary level of adaptability."
"The solution removes the need for hardware. We can easily create servers or machines. Just by clicking or specifying our requirements, like memory size or disk space, it's set up for us. The tool eliminates the need for hardware. We can choose what we need and pay as we use it. It is flexible and can integrate with any product."
"The feature I found most valuable was the vertical and horizontal scaling."
"Auto-scaling is a good feature."
"Every AWS user should utilize the solution if they are not using Lambda."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product is flexible."
"I find the solution's scaling capability to be an important benefit. You can scale it vertically or horizontally, i.e., you can upgrade the hardware or clone the machine. The solution is also easy to manage and flexible. Additionally, you get some layers of security without paying for it."
 

Cons

"The solution's configuration process could be better."
"There is a need for improvement in understanding the pricing structure, as it is complex and depends on several factors such as the location of data centers."
"The technical support needs to be improved."
"The big issue for us is the cost of using the solution."
"If your EC2 instance doesn't boot up, you're in the dark about what's happening. It would be amazing if you could get a view of the console to see the status. There's something called the AWS Console, which is a web portal. I would like to see a virtual screen of an instance that hasn't started properly, so I can see where it crashed."
"The price could always be a bit better."
"EC2 is doing what it is intended to do, and I have no specific improvements to suggest."
"The documentation for this solution could be improved. For example, sometimes it's difficult to find documentation for integration with applications."
"I have two areas of improvement to comment on. Most of the product names in AWS are not indicative of what they are doing. Moreover, AWS is not organized and you do not have the full platform with you. It is hard to know some AWS services."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing could be a little bit more competitive."
"The product is expensive."
"The price of this product could be a little bit lower."
"Its price is affordable for enterprise customers."
"The licences for this solution are based on the number of instances. This determines the EC2 type that is used and this is then priced accordingly."
"The tool's pricing is good and not expensive."
"The pricing is not fixed and it is based on usage."
"AWS offered some credits, so we have been able to enjoy some of those benefits. The pricing was fair."
"I find the solution's pricing reasonable. You need to pay extra for IP and other miscellaneous costs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise28
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?
Regarding licensing and setup costs, we always study in detail using lower environments such as User Acceptance Testing or sandbox environments. Before creation, we consult AWS official documentati...
What needs improvement with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?
I don't work with predictive scaling. I know this feature, but I have never worked with it. For me, availability is something different. If you want to set up your application to be highly availabl...
What is your primary use case for Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?
I have been working with this product for almost more than 10 years. I worked on a backup recovery project for a customer. I set up the backup recovery for them because they had multiple accounts. ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

AWS RAM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.