Amazon Inspector vs SecurityScorecard comparison

Read 13 SecurityScorecard reviews

4,158 Views
2,578 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon Inspector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

SecurityScorecard and Amazon Inspector compete in the cybersecurity assessment and risk management category. SecurityScorecard appears to have the upper hand in vendor risk analysis due to its automated alerts and score analysis.

Features: SecurityScorecard provides detailed insights into third-party risks, enabling early vulnerability identification and improved security decisions, along with features like automated alerts and vendor score analysis. Amazon Inspector offers automated vulnerability detection, continuous scanning of AWS resources, and actionable remediation recommendations, supporting various AWS workloads and compliance standards.

Room for Improvement: SecurityScorecard could enhance its remediation guidance, scoring customization, and GRC integrations. Alert customization and improved active third-party risk management are also desired. Amazon Inspector would benefit from broader vulnerability scanning, better integration with AWS services, and customizable vulnerability checks, alongside expanded coverage to include hybrid and third-party environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SecurityScorecard supports hybrid and public cloud environments with generally favorable feedback, though some concerns about response time exist. Amazon Inspector is recognized for effective deployment in public cloud environments, with suggestions for better organization in customer support to manage volumes efficiently.

Pricing and ROI: SecurityScorecard is positioned in the mid-range pricing tier, perceived as expensive but offers a good ROI for digital threat identification. Amazon Inspector is known for fair usage-based pricing, offering affordability. Both products contribute value in risk visibility and decision-making.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Inspector vs. SecurityScorecard Report (Updated: September 2026).

Amazon Inspector vs. SecurityScorecard

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (27th)

SecurityScorecard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Legal & Compliance (2nd), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecurityScorecard is 4.9%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SecurityScorecard	4.9%
Amazon Inspector	1.5%
Other	93.6%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

John D'Arcy

Co-Founder, Professional AWS Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Automated vulnerability assessments continuously enhance security

The most valuable features probably are the ability to do automated vulnerability assessments, which it does with Amazon Inspector version two. It operates continuously, so as soon as resources are created, it scans them for vulnerabilities. This allows me to pinpoint potential security vulnerabilities and provide actionable recommendations relatively quickly. Larger enterprises usually use Inspector to gather all the vulnerabilities, the CVEs, across all accounts in an AWS organization. The enterprises I work for typically have many accounts in their organization, such as thousands of accounts where I am at the moment. It is a way to gather the vulnerabilities that are present on EC2 instances, container images, and Lambda functions.

Read full review

Aayush Gangwar

Application security engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

Vendor risk monitoring has strengthened our security posture and reduced insurance costs

In terms of improvements, I feel SecurityScorecard could enhance some of the integrations based on AI platforms, where I could receive suggestions from the AI tool regarding why SecurityScorecard rates specific issues as critical or high. Details on the technical mitigation would help my non-technical teams understand the security issues better. I think improvements could be made on the reporting side as well, such as the ability to download customizable reports. While SecurityScorecard offers various kinds of reports now, they are limited to predefined formats. Having the ability to choose specific fields for an automated report would be very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function."

"The findings dashboards are neat and easy to understand, offering clear demarcations for different types of findings and detailed insights into specific vulnerabilities and their associated instances. It is not a place where everything is dumped together. It offers an easy-to-understand layout."

"It is scanning the whole repository for any sort of vulnerabilities, so it allows us to be more confident in our DevSecOps and not put a lot of folks or attention to it."

"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option."

"The automated vulnerability detection aspect is most valuable."

"Amazon Inspector is highly stable, rated ten out of ten, and this stability impacts business security and administration positively."

"The assessment reports provided by Amazon Inspector have helped me in identifying security vulnerabilities in my cloud applications by giving us a nicely designed dashboard that provides all the security information we need to work on remediation."

"The vulnerability discovery is valuable, and they also rank those vulnerabilities for you. So, you could rapidly attack some of the higher, severe vulnerabilities as they pop up, if they do pop up."

More Amazon Inspector pros

"The best features SecurityScorecard offers for me are mainly being able to properly position my organization's security posture because of the score that is provided."

"The initial setup takes just a couple of days and doesn't require any installation."

"The biggest benefit is visibility, allowing organizations to understand their risks, vulnerabilities, and potential threats."

"With SecurityScorecard, the most valuable feature is the ability to identify if third parties or vendors have digital threats that may impact our company. It also scans all internal domains and IPs to find vulnerabilities in the digital landscape. The continuous monitoring capabilities have been beneficial by providing ongoing assessments of potential risks."

"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."

"SecurityScorecard has positively impacted my organization and my customers by providing numerous benefits, as customers easily obtain the score, can determine what ports are open and many other things so that they can secure their DNS, applications, and networks effectively, and they have improved compliance and security with the help of SecurityScorecard."

"SecurityScorecard continuously scans just about every IP address out there, which means there is information available about virtually every company."

"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."

More SecurityScorecard pros

Cons

"The most challenging aspect I faced with Amazon Inspector during integration was automating the remediation process."

"The other point is that the reporting features of Inspector need improvement. For example, I am in an organization with millions of CVEs, and getting an overview of all this is challenging."

"One major area for improvement is remediation. My team works on remediating findings over time, likely using available patches. However, easier integration with Amazon's patching services would be very helpful."

"One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect."

"It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents."

"There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

"There isn't too much to improve right now. Scanning on demand or as a part of the pipeline versus a post pipeline solution would be good, but it is not a deal breaker by any means."

"There are challenges associated with the interdependencies in AWS services, like requiring an Active Directory for other services, resulting in additional charges."

More Amazon Inspector cons

"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."

"SecurityScorecard can be improved. As it currently stands, it does a good job monitoring public-facing devices and the internet and DNS."

"I suggest that SecurityScorecard could be improved by giving a little more specifics on how the scanning works and how you are able to detect those IPs, including more details on the privacy side about how the scanner operates and how it is sometimes allowed to do those scans."

"There are areas for improvement in response times and overall support."

"SecurityScorecard can be complex during setup, and I would recommend that anyone implementing it get help setting it up because it is not as straightforward as people might think."

"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."

"I realized that because my company was acquired by a bigger organization, SecurityScorecard started associating other portfolio company vulnerabilities to our score, which was not helpful because it was giving us wrong data and giving us vulnerabilities we did not have."

"The product can be improved by incorporating more data points and intelligence around dark web information and threat data."

More SecurityScorecard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The lowest cost would be around $10 for a few small accounts, however, for thousands of accounts, it could be around $5000 to $6000 dollars per month."

"The pricing is very transparent and clear."

"It's priced according to market standards for its services."

"It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."

"The pricing of SecurityScorecard is fair. I would rate it a seven. It's a bit more on the expensive side. In Brazil, for example, making a payment to the vendor involves wire transfers and high taxes, making it more expensive. Selling SecurityScorecard or any American vendor's product in the United States is very different from selling in South America or Brazil."

"Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

"The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?

I am not honestly sure about the pricing side of Amazon Inspector, but that is taken care of by a separate team. I believe it's cheaper than the other third-party solutions.

What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?

They might launch support for third-party environments in the next version regarding the best features in Amazon Inspector from my perspective. The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a litt...

What is your primary use case for Amazon Inspector?

I mostly use Amazon Inspector for vulnerability scanning on AWS native applications. For hybrid applications, we have different security scanners.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?

I have seen a return on investment with SecurityScorecard as it is easy to use and has saved us some time, so we do not need to do the scans on our own.

What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?

I suggest that SecurityScorecard could be improved by giving a little more specifics on how the scanning works and how you are able to detect those IPs, including more details on the privacy side a...

What is your primary use case for SecurityScorecard?

My main use case for SecurityScorecard is to keep an eye on our vulnerabilities and also monitor which companies follow us in the platform, and we keep track when our score drops so we can fix it. ...

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Amazon Inspector

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon Inspector Competitors

Bitsight vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 15% of the time

RiskRecon vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 10% of the time

UpGuard Vendor Risk vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 6% of the time

ProcessUnity vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 5% of the time

Black Kite vs SecurityScorecard

Compared 5% of the time

More SecurityScorecard Competitors

Product Reports

Download Amazon Inspector product report

Amazon Inspector

October 2026

Download SecurityScorecard product report

September 2026

Overview

Amazon Inspector offers automated vulnerability detection, scanning AWS workloads and recommending remediation, ensuring enhanced security without constant supervision.

Amazon Inspector provides advanced automated vulnerability assessments, specifically designed for AWS environments. It scans EC2 instances, ECR, and container images for vulnerabilities, ranking them by priority. With capabilities like integration with CloudTrail and CloudWatch, adherence to compliance benchmarks, and a comprehensive view for diverse resources, it supports continuous detection and detailed reporting. Users can schedule regular scans, maintaining strong security oversight. Current feedback highlights a need for improved scanning of EBS, S3, and EFS, as well as expanded databases and better patch integration.

What features make Amazon Inspector stand out?

Automated Vulnerability Assessments: Detects and prioritizes vulnerabilities in AWS workloads.
Continuous Detection: Keeps an eye on EC2, ECR, and container images for ongoing risk management.
Integration Capabilities: Works with CloudTrail and CloudWatch to centralize oversight and alerts.
Compliance Adherence: Aligns with industry benchmarks for strengthened regulatory compliance.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive reports with findings and CVEs.

What benefits do users gain from Amazon Inspector?

Enhanced Security: Automates vulnerability detection, reducing manual efforts.
Efficiency: Identifies and prioritizes threats, streamlining resource allocation.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed reports improve understanding and response strategies.
Regulatory Compliance: Aligns with compliance standards, aiding legal adherence.

Amazon Inspector is utilized across industries, including finance, healthcare, and tech, assisting with robust security management in cloud-native environments. By integrating with services like Security Hub and SIEM, businesses maintain compliance and streamline alert management. This solution supports broader security frameworks, often paired with third-party tools to enhance protection strategies.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SecurityScorecard provides cybersecurity management with features like continuous monitoring and comprehensive vulnerability identification, crucial for managing third-party risks and improving security posture through external assessments and visual dashboards.

SecurityScorecard enhances cybersecurity by offering tools for external security assessments, vulnerability detection, and informed decision-making. By incorporating visual dashboards and daily updates, it simplifies usability and risk management. Its integration with Jira aids in efficient handling of cyber risks, while compliance support and risk scoring further reinforce a strong security framework. The platform assists in fostering effective security conversations with stakeholders and vendors, although enhancements in response time, mobile functionality, and threat intelligence integration are desired by users. SecurityScorecard's intuitive design and automated processes, combined with its support for cyber insurance underwriting, provide a comprehensive approach to managing modern cybersecurity challenges.

What are SecurityScorecard's Essential Features?

Easy Reporting: Simplifies the creation of security reports for stakeholders.
Continuous Monitoring: Constantly tracks security status and vulnerabilities.
Third-Party Risk Assessment: Evaluates external entities to identify potential risks.
Vulnerability Identification: Comprehensive detection of system weaknesses.
Jira Integration: Enhances risk management and task tracking.

What Benefits or ROI Should Users Look For?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens overall cyber defense strategies.
Informed Decision-Making: Empowers stakeholders with actionable insights for security decisions.
Enhanced Compliance Support: Assists organizations in meeting regulatory and compliance requirements.
Efficient Risk Management: Streamlines processes to identify and mitigate risks effectively.

Industries like healthcare and finance leverage SecurityScorecard to assess cybersecurity resilience. By scanning domains and providing detailed security scores, it aids organizations in informed vendor selection and robust risk management, ensuring compliance and reducing exposure to cyber threats.

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame

TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial