No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache Spark vs IBM InfoSphere BigInsights [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
69
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (1st), Compute Service (6th), Java Frameworks (2nd)
IBM InfoSphere BigInsights ...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Devindra Weerasooriya - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Architect at Devtech
Provides a consistent framework for building data integration and access solutions with reliable performance
The in-memory computation feature is certainly helpful for my processing tasks. It is helpful because while using structures that could be held in memory rather than stored during the period of computation, I go for the in-memory option, though there are limitations related to holding it in memory that need to be addressed, but I have a preference for in-memory computation. The solution is beneficial in that it provides a base-level long-held understanding of the framework that is not variant day by day, which is very helpful in my prototyping activity as an architect trying to assess Apache Spark, Great Expectations, and Vault-based solutions versus those proposed by clients like TIBCO or Informatica.
it_user743022 - PeerSpot reviewer
BigData Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Served our customers better by giving real-time suggestions and proactive maintenance, however the UI was not interactive
* The UI was not interactive: Responses used to be very slow and hang up at times. * The UI was not really helping to track the real-time jobs and its logs. * You can bring in a better UI for job management and health checks. * Developer API documentation needs improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution has been very stable."
"Faster time to parse and compute data makes web-based queries for plotting data easier."
"We use it for ETL purposes as well as for implementing the full transformation pipelines."
"The memory processing engine is the solution's most valuable aspect. It processes everything extremely fast, and it's in the cluster itself. It acts as a memory engine and is very effective in processing data correctly."
"Spark is used for transformations from large volumes of data, and it is usefully distributed."
"It allows the loading and investigation of very lard data sets, has MLlib for machine learning, Spark streaming, and both the new and old dataframe API."
"Powerful language."
"Provides a lot of good documentation compared to other solutions."
"This helped us to serve our customers better by giving real-time suggestions and proactive maintenance."
"It gives us the option of extending our analytics system."
"This is a very helpful product, with continuous improvements by IBM and a great customer service which enables easy access to valuable information for both Hadoop developers and system administrators."
"It integrates with JSqsh, enabling us to submit long-running exports from the shell."
"InfoSphere Streams was the one core product from the platform in which we were using. We were building a real-time response system and we built it on InfoSphere Streams."
"The thing that I have found most valuable in this solution is the BIQSQL implementation which is fully SQL ANSI compliant."
"Watson is the perfect engine for text analysis for us, but in 2014 it doesn’t support the Russian language."
"Definitely a product worth evaluating, esp if you are an IBM shop and if done on Bluemix, it gives a jump start on protoypes/POCs."
 

Cons

"It requires overcoming a significant learning curve due to its robust and feature-rich nature."
"Apart from the restrictions that come with its in-memory implementation. It has been improved significantly up to version 3.0, which is currently in use."
"Its UI can be better. Maintaining the history server is a little cumbersome, and it should be improved."
"Apache Spark lacks geospatial data."
"When you want to extract data from your HDFS and other sources then it is kind of tricky because you have to connect with those sources."
"Apache Spark is very difficult to use. It would require a data engineer. It is not available for every engineer today because they need to understand the different concepts of Spark, which is very, very difficult and it is not easy to learn."
"The initial set-up is quite complex because you have to set-up many different configuration parameters that are deployment-specific."
"Although you are able to perform complex transformations using Spark libraries, the support for SQL to perform transformations is still limited."
"Unfortunately the stability of the platform was an issue."
"For our business customer pricing is very important motivation, so I can advise change licensing policy from “by volume in the cluster” to “number of machines in the cluster”."
"I'd like to see faster execution time, especially for simple queries that don't touch on many rows and don't involve many operations (Joins, Unions, Groupbys)."
"I encountered issues with having the appropriate documentation resources, as well as getting the right stability when explored virtualized environments based on Virtualbox and HyperV software."
"Initial setup is rather complex in comparison with Cloudera."
"I have found a lot of issues in Fluid Query and BigInsights Applications to move data in the enterprise version."
"The UI was not interactive: Responses used to be very slow and hang up at times."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
"It is quite expensive. In fact, it accounts for almost 50% of the cost of our entire project."
"Considering the product version used in my company, I feel that the tool is not costly since the product is available for free."
"The solution is affordable and there are no additional licensing costs."
"They provide an open-source license for the on-premise version."
"The product is expensive, considering the setup."
"It is an open-source platform. We do not pay for its subscription."
"Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Construction Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise33
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Spark?
Apache Spark is open-source, so it doesn't incur any charges.
What needs improvement with Apache Spark?
I find that there really lacks the technical depth to do any recommendations for future updates of Apache Spark. I used it for two years for our prototype work and testing things, but because I had...
What is your primary use case for Apache Spark?
I attempted to use Apache Spark in one of our customer projects, but after the initial test, our customer moved to another technology and another database system. I do not have any final remarks on...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
InfoSphere BigInsights
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
Coherent Path Inc., Optibus, Delhaize America, Diyotta Inc., Ernst & Young, Teikoku Databank Ltd., NCSU, Vestas
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.