Apiiro vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apiiro and Ivanti are both solutions in the Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) category. Apiiro is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while Ivanti is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Additionally, 100% of Apiiro users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Apiiro

Read 3 Apiiro reviews

4,329 Views
2,165 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Read 52 Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management reviews

11,586 Views
695 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apiiro

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Apiiro and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management are both prominent in the security and asset management sector. Apiiro shines with advanced risk management solutions, while Ivanti's efficient endpoint management stands out, potentially justifying its premium cost.

Features: Apiiro's standout features include strong API visibility, centralized management for security risks, and comprehensive API traffic insights. Security-focused monitoring helps identify exposed APIs, aiding in proactive governance. Ivanti is known for AI-powered automation, robust patch management, and centralized endpoint visibility, all contributing to reduced manual work. Both solutions enhance operational efficiency and governance.

Room for Improvement: Apiiro needs to enhance integration capabilities, improve customization options, and expand reporting functionalities. Ivanti could benefit from simplifying automated processes, offering more extensive troubleshooting tools, and streamlining dashboard navigation for better user experience. Addressing these areas could further strengthen their offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apiiro's integration process is seamless, with a focus on minimizing setup time. Their proactive customer service ensures smooth deployment. Ivanti offers comprehensive support and guidance for complex setups, though its deployment is slightly more sophisticated. Their structured support effectively manages enterprise environments.

Pricing and ROI: Apiiro presents a competitive pricing model, delivering a favorable ROI through its emphasis on risk reduction. Ivanti's higher pricing is offset by its extensive feature set, promising significant long-term ROI via operational efficiencies. Both solutions offer distinct cost-benefit advantages depending on business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiiro vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiiro

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (27th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (18th), API Security (16th), Software Supply Chain Security (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (20th)

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (4th), Vulnerability Management (13th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (2nd), Mobile Threat Defense (4th), Patch Management (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (15th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (4th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (1st)

Featured Reviews

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Comprehensive risk analysis helps identify key performance trends but report access needs improvement

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information. I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

Read full review

reviewer2882148

Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally

In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The positive impact I have seen from working with Apiiro for my company includes the metrics that we get from Apiiro, which have been extremely helpful."

"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."

"Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."

"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."

"I experience every day how the unified platform has really optimized IT and security operations processes since patch management automatically patches the vulnerabilities."

"A positive impact of using Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management on my organization is the ability to perform mass updates in the environment, as today we are able to update hundreds of thousands of computers at once."

"By moving to Intune, they were able to save the complete cost for Ivanti Neurons for UEM and put it towards something they were already paying for, and additionally they improved enrollment deployment time significantly and now can deploy laptops in an hour and even give the task to end users."

"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."

"AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work."

"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."

"We can set a maintenance window and push the patch."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management pros

Cons

"User management is a little bit clunky."

"My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow."

"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."

"The disadvantage in connection with Windows devices is that the pushing of policies takes some time."

"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can be improved by ensuring it runs a little more smoothly. It should not lag every single time I have to open a window, and it should not take so much time to load a lot of data."

"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."

"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

"We have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing."

"Regarding Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management agent in general, it can seem somewhat laggy."

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."

"The solution is affordable."

"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."

"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."

"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."

"The solution is expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apiiro?

One area Apiiro could improve is reporting customization and dashboard flexibility with more advanced filtering and easier communication.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apiiro?

Apiiro is primarily used for code scanning and integration with source code control. The main use cases include code scanning and code snippet analysis. Apiiro provides security and visibility by h...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apiiro?

I would highly recommend Apiiro and a clear understanding of the API landscape and integration requirements before implementing it. Apiiro provides the most value to organizations that have multipl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has been pretty easy and straightforward. We have excellent service from our sales rep and also have ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

There are many features that can be integrated with Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management. The event log viewer can be made significantly better so that we can export logs, view them properly, and ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?

Our main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is to perform Windows patching and third-party application patching to set up an automated schedule so that all the endpoints are updated...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cycode vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Ox Security vs Apiiro

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Apiiro

Compared 4% of the time

ArmorCode vs Apiiro

Compared 4% of the time

More Apiiro Competitors

Microsoft Intune vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 5% of the time

BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

ProcessUnity vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro

October 2026

Download Apiiro product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

October 2026

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report

Download Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management product report

Also Known As

Apiiro Control Plane (ASOC), Apiiro API Security (SAST), Apiiro Open Source (SCA)

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Apiiro

Ivanti

Overview

Apiiro fosters seamless integration of security into the software development lifecycle, enhancing compliance and risk management through continuous code risk assessments.

Apiiro addresses security challenges by providing a robust platform that continuously monitors and assesses code risks. It integrates security directly into development processes to ensure compliance and reduce risk. By leveraging this approach, teams can manage risks proactively, safeguard applications, and enhance overall development efficiency.

What features make Apiiro valuable?

Continuous Code Risk Assessment: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities throughout the development lifecycle.
Integrated Compliance Automation: Streamlines compliance with various standards by automating checks and balances.
Contextual Insights: Delivers meaningful insights to facilitate informed decision-making on security practices.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances teamwork by aligning security teams with development workflows.

What benefits should you evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Frequent assessments lead to improved code quality and reduced vulnerabilities.
Risk Management Efficiency: Real-time analytics offer proactive risk mitigation, saving time and resources.
Accelerated Development: Automated processes enable faster and more secure software delivery.
Reduced Compliance Costs: Automated checks decrease compliance-related expenses.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Apiiro's integration improves compliance and security standards due to heightened regulatory requirements. Its risk-focused approach empowers these industries to secure data and meet stringent security requirements effectively.

Apiiro

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.

What are the most important features?

AI-powered Automation: Reduces manual work through intelligent automation.
Centralized Management: Unified control of devices from a single interface.
Real-time Visibility: Instant access to device status and operations.
Efficient Patch Management: Prioritizes and automates patch deployments.
Neurons Bots: Automates complex IT processes, enhancing efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Time Savings: Automation reduces manual task duration significantly.
Improved Compliance: Ensures security protocol adherence with ease.
Streamlined Operations: Centralized management simplifies IT workflows.
Enhanced Security: Effective patch management reduces vulnerability risks.
Device Health Monitoring: Supports continuous oversight of device status.

In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Morgan Stanley, Rakuten, Jack Henry, SoFi, Colgate, Navan

Frontier Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Apiiro vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

September 2026

Free Report: Apiiro vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiiro vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiiro vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management report.

See our list of best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.