No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Archer Integrated Risk Management vs RSA Archer comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Archer Integrated Risk Mana...
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
16th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
RSA Archer
Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
GRC (1st), IT Governance (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Archer Integrated Risk Management is 1.9%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of RSA Archer is 8.1%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
RSA Archer8.1%
Archer Integrated Risk Management1.9%
Other90.0%
IT Vendor Risk Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2645985 - PeerSpot reviewer
Program Manager, Egrc at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Customer service excels while user interface could benefit from more modernizing
I use Archer Integrated Risk Management as an Integrated Risk Management (IRM) solution. I use it out of the box for what they provide Archer Integrated Risk Management is stable. Customer service is good. The company is very active in its roadmap, developing new solutions and adding…
CJ
Information Security Specialist at Dubai Health Authority
Centralized management strengthens compliance with good look and feel
From my perspective as a customer and end user, Archer has an impressive look and feel, but the most adaptive feature is its ease of configuration which helps to enhance our process according to our maturity. It's more about our organization getting centralized with an integrated approach that focuses on risk governance and compliance. When can provide a detailed dashboards to management with the details of risks from top-down or bottom-up prioritizing actions based on its criticality or necessity. This allows us to show end users and management where the issues lie and effectively demonstrate accountability and visibility in compliance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Archer Integrated Risk Management is stable."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"In two to three months, even non-technical people can be masters of the product."
"Among the most valuable features of this solution is the easy implementation and the degree of automation that it offers."
"Risk management is one of the most impressive features of Archer, especially with the recent restructuring of the user interface."
"It is easy to implement, it is easy to change the workflow, and it is easy to customize the processes."
"Solution is scalable."
"I have found all the features to be valuable, including those involving reporting, the dashboard, notifications, email modules, the database and data input."
 

Cons

"The user interface, although it has improved over the years, could benefit from more modernizing."
"There are missing features in risk survey functionalities and the need for stronger dashboarding."
"Archer's performance could be improved - older versions can be very slow, and the application crashes from time to time."
"Performance could be improved."
"Because I have not upgraded, the graphical user interface is not the current one. It is not very modern and as user-friendly as it could be."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"The dashboard that is a part of the RSA Archer could be more aesthetic."
"There should be an in-built feature that allows live data from vulnerabilities and threats from reliable sources to be streamed directly through their data field."
"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."
"Archer could be improved by having more customization."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I am not sure about other companies, but it's quite expensive."
"It is not expensive. It is reasonable. We only pay for the licensing."
"The solution's price should be reduced. You only have to pay the license and there are no additional fees."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"I am not 100% familiar with that, especially with their new model. I just know that the way they've licensed per user to scale is good."
"At the higher end of the price scale, but provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products."
"The price of RSA Archer is good. The price isn't too high considering it is a leading tool in the market."
"Fairly highly-priced, especially for smaller companies."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Insurance Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Archer Integrated Risk Management?
The solution is more premium in my opinion. Licensing could always be improved, as with any vendor.
What needs improvement with Archer Integrated Risk Management?
The user interface, although it has improved over the years, could benefit from more modernizing. There are missing features in risk survey functionalities and the need for stronger dashboarding. T...
What is your primary use case for Archer Integrated Risk Management?
I use Archer Integrated Risk Management as an Integrated Risk Management (IRM) solution. I use it out of the box for what they provide.
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
While it provides benefits in terms of security, the pricing is a bit higher than customers typically expect. It would be helpful if RSA Archer had the capability for two-way integration because, i...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
Regarding the compliance, risk, and governance tools, I am comfortable discussing the tools in the GRC category. The specific module from ServiceNow is the ServiceNow Compliance, Risk, and Governan...
What advice do you have for others considering RSA Archer?
I have been in touch with about three companies who use RSA Archer actively in the compliance area. These companies use RSA Archer for nearly all purposes, including governance, internal risk, and ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Archer
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about SecurityScorecard, BitSight, OneTrust and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: September 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.