Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Loom Systems comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Auvik and ServiceNow are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Auvik is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while ServiceNow is ranked #67. Auvik holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to ServiceNow’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 217 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,973 Views
8,728 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

1,959 Views
1,724 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Loom Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Loom Systems and Auvik Network Management are competing products in the IT management sector. ANM has the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set, whereas Loom Systems is favored for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: Loom Systems is noted for its predictive analytics capabilities, proactive issue resolution features, and seamless integration potential. ANM distinguishes itself with robust network visibility, control features, and extensive monitoring tools, making it ideal for network management.

Room for Improvement: Loom Systems could benefit from expanding its monitoring toolset, enhancing network control features, and improving predictive accuracy in analytics. ANM should focus on reducing setup costs, improving cost efficiency for smaller businesses, and streamlining user interfaces for ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ANM supports a streamlined deployment process and has responsive customer service. Loom Systems integrates effortlessly with existing platforms and is known for its supportive customer service, catering to businesses seeking quick adaptation.

Pricing and ROI: Loom Systems is known for lower setup costs and offers good ROI for smaller businesses. ANM, despite higher initial costs, provides value through its extensive capabilities, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive network solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

217

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

67th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.2%
Loom Systems	0.5%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features are the alerting and monitoring."

"The feature I find most valuable in Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the rapid alerting system for when systems go up and down. T"

"Auvik improved our organization by allowing us to stay on top of issues with our clients, alerting us in a timely manner so we can react proactively, often before the client realizes something is going on."

"Since using Auvik Network Management (ANM), I have seen a positive impact, including reduced report times, continuous monitoring of network traffic, faster incident resolution, and the ability to centrally control every network device."

"It also integrates with our ticketing system. We use ConnectWise and having that integration is valuable for billing and for all-around general management. Having one product that can integrate with everything is valuable because we don't have to worry about building out APIs or custom maps to do that for us."

"The main selling point was the traffic insights feature, which better explains our network traffic. Auvik has many different features, but we primarily want it for traffic insights. It has monitoring and network discovery. Network discovery is useful, but we already have a monitoring solution. The network map is easy to use."

"Automatic alerting is probably the most valuable."

"As a cloud-based solution, Auvik is reliable and easy to use."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"Bringing Loom in ensures that the incident process, request process, change, all of these processes are improved."

"The solution is absolutely scalable."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The solution is very scalable; a company wouldn't have any issues expanding it if they needed to, and we have a few thousand users on the solution."

Cons

"They may need to add some more integration pieces with different vendors. For example, API keys aren't available for certain vendors. While everything that I have works with Auvik and gets monitored by it, there are a few network items I have that I would like to see deeper integration with..."

"The map would be the first thing I would like to see improved because sometimes the maps get really odd-looking and the automated placement of things on the map, devices on the map is sometimes not right. In fact, I was just looking at the map and something got moved. I'm sure it didn't get moved, it's just that Auvik realized it was supposed to go somewhere else. So the map could be better if there was a little bit of manual manipulation that you could do."

"More options in the network map of Auvik Network Management (ANM) would be beneficial. Currently, we are just getting layer one, layer two, and layer three."

"Sometimes it's a little bit slow to load, but I can't think of anything else that could be improved."

"It is not at all cheap. We migrated to Domotz because of its pricing."

"It's rare, but sometimes the actual application itself can be a little slow. That's because of the amount of data that it is pulling from remote networks. That has been my only complaint with it and it's really not even a complaint. But if the speed of the application were to improve, it would help a lot."

"Scheduling maintenance would be much easier if there was a dedicated section readily visible on each client's main page."

"Some of the automation pieces for discovery still need a little bit more improvement. I wouldn't mind seeing some more security features as that's the world we're driving into. I know Auvik probably wants to try to keep itself separate because that's its brand, but even if they brought on board another brand that was able to plug into them, it would benefit us. It would lower some more network security costs if as a company, they are a one-stop shop. They have already got the network piece going. If they improved in that area and focused a lot on that, they would gain me as a customer, and they would probably gain a lot of others."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy, especially in the initial setup which can take six months of work, especially when you have a large estate that you're dealing with."

"The reporting is a bit weak."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be tiered so that you get a discount for more devices. We're fairly early on in the billing process, but it could be slightly cheaper."

"The pricing is by device. We have 75 devices, which is a little more than we really need. With school and volume discounts, it is still a little over $16,000 annually. Our WiFi access points are not being billed, but all our switches and routers are."

"The pricing model makes a lot of sense and it's pretty reasonable considering it's based on the Managed Network devices that we have out there."

"It is a little more on the expensive side, but I feel that it is a premium product. It is good."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable for what we get. It's billed by certain, core network devices that it monitors, but I'm not billed for all the devices it monitors. For example, wireless access points and small things like that, throughout the network, are not billed."

"I believe that our bill is somewhere around the $600 range per month. We're monitoring about 63 machines. Most of them are servers. So, $10 to monitor it for an entire month is amazing. You couldn't get somebody in India for that cheap."

"I believe the product is fairly priced, but I would consider it a better value if it were improved in certain areas."

"I would like it to be more cost-effective or affordable. It's not the most expensive one, but it's also not the cheapest solution out there. You pay month to month. It is what it is. It is not for everyone, but it depends on what you're looking for in your budget."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	158
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	26

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is average. The cost is typically higher for these kinds of tools, so it is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems

Compared 12% of the time

Moogsoft vs Loom Systems

Compared 9% of the time

BigPanda vs Loom Systems

Compared 6% of the time

OpsRamp vs Loom Systems

Compared 5% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 5% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

October 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2026

Download Loom Systems product report

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

Loom Systems is recognized for its flexibility in RFS and infrastructure monitoring, catering to IT service management. It aids in app creation and configuration, particularly useful for incident management and service desk operations.

Offering user-friendly functionality throughout the software development lifecycle, Loom Systems is valued for its adaptable capabilities in creating tailored implementations. While features like change and configuration management can be challenging, Loom Systems still stands out for its ease of use. Its platform, though resource-intensive initially, integrates with other tools, supporting IT challenges like automation and root cause analysis.

What are the key features of Loom Systems?

RFS Flexibility: Provides adaptable RFS options tailored to varied monitoring needs.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Allows comprehensive monitoring of IT infrastructure.
App Creation Platform: Facilitates easy development of customized applications.
Change Management: Though challenging, its management capabilities are integral.
Integration Capabilities: Supports integration with existing tools for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced IT Service Management: Facilitates efficient management of incident requests and problem resolution.
Versatile Use Cases: Supports diverse functions from asset management to security and HR modules.
Automation and Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and migration processes while enabling automation.
Adaptable Implementations: Offers flexibility for custom solutions catering to enterprise needs.
Scalability: Suitable for medium to large enterprises with support for expansion.

In specific industries, Loom Systems is deployed predominantly for IT service management, asset management, and incident management. Medium to large enterprises use it for tasks such as implementation and automation, with additional security and HR capabilities. While smaller enterprises might consider cost, its robust features make it a preferred choice for IT tasks.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems

September 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Loom Systems report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.