AWS Firewall Manager vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cisco are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.3% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Cisco’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,491 Views
1,491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...

Read 29 Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center reviews

1,714 Views
1,628 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

AWS Firewall Manager and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center are competing in the network security solutions category. AWS appears to have the upper hand in environments that heavily utilize AWS services due to its seamless integration and pricing, while Cisco excels in offering comprehensive security features catering to large enterprises.

Features: AWS Firewall Manager supports centralized control for AWS-hosted applications, reducing manual management tasks. It integrates with AWS services to simplify security measures and offers real-time logs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center includes robust analytics, intrusion prevention, and seamless integration with other Cisco products, making it effective for policy enforcement and threat management.

Room for Improvement: AWS could enhance its analytics capabilities and expand its support for non-AWS environments. While its interface is user-friendly, more advanced threat intelligence features could be beneficial. Cisco could improve its deployment process to be more streamlined. Its pricing model can be less flexible for smaller enterprises, and better integration with non-Cisco products would enhance its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Firewall Manager benefits from rapid deployment within AWS environments backed by existing AWS support structures. In contrast, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center requires more complex deployment but provides extensive support and documentation, ensuring thorough integration into diverse IT ecosystems.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Firewall Manager is cost-effective, particularly for businesses already utilizing AWS services, due to reduced manual security management. It typically offers a significant ROI for cloud-focused enterprises. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center involves a higher initial investment. However, the advanced security features yield considerable ROI for large operations needing extensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,403 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is 3.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Firewall Manager	4.3%
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center	3.2%
Other	92.5%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

SurajYadav

Network Security Consultant at NTT DATA

Centralized firewall control has improved visibility and policy management but needs faster UI performance

The best features of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center are the centralized management and strong security visibility. The most useful feature for me is centralized policy management, where I can create and enforce access control policies across multiple firewalls from a single console. It saves a lot of time and ensures consistency. Another key feature is IPS visibility. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center provides detailed intrusion events and signatures, which help in quickly identifying and responding to threats. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center has had a positive impact mainly by improving centralized control and visibility across our firewall environment. Earlier, managing multiple firewalls individually was time-consuming and inconsistent. With Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, we can manage policies from a single console, which has improved efficiency and reduced configuration errors. It has also enhanced our security posture with better visibility into traffic and IPS events. We are able to detect and respond to threats more quickly, which helps in reducing risk and improving overall incident response time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"The product is highly reliable."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."

"My advice for anybody who is considering the AWS Firewall Manager is that it is pretty simple to set up and easy to use."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"The support is good, they are always good."

"I like the dashboard since it gives me a lot of information."

"The platform has significantly enhanced our organization's operations by providing secure communication channels between different office locations."

"The most valuable features are the Virtual Private Network and the Electronic Control Lists."

"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is the UTM."

"With Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center, we can manage policies from a single console, which has improved efficiency, reduced configuration errors, and enhanced our security posture with better visibility into traffic and IPS events so we are able to detect and respond to threats more quickly, reducing risk and improving overall incident response time."

"One of the most valuable features of Cisco Secure Firewalls is their seamless integration with other Cisco products."

"Malware detection, URL filtering, and antivirus are the most beneficial features for our security management. The platform has three main components: filters, hardware, and antivirus. We use the standard approach for automation and integration. The person in charge of management follows the rules and policies of the equipment and handles operations. However, we haven't set up any notifications, so it's mostly manual."

More Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center pros

Cons

"AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"Cisco firewalls use old ESR or a Linux system, and there are problems with encryption. When we switch on encryption, the throughput goes down."

"Cisco Firepower has been effective in solving various problems, but it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly like Fortinet."

"The solution could improve the number of ports available and load balancing."

"I expect more integration with AI."

"I would go with a rating of three out of ten for the stability issues."

"The interface is an area that could be improved."

"The first version had a lot of bugs, but the recent versions have sorted them out."

"It's not very user-friendly and can be somewhat disorganized."

More Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"The price of the solution is expensive. We do not have to pay more than the standard licensing fees."

"The solution is expensive. We have a multi-license, and we pay extra for support."

"The platform is costly."

"I rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten. The licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"The product pricing is reasonable and falls in the mid-range."

"It could be considered relatively cheaper when compared to some other vendors in the market."

"It is rather expensive."

More Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?

My experience with pricing and licensing for Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is that it is generally on the higher side compared to some alternatives. The initial setup cost can be signific...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?

One area where Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center can be improved is the user interface. At times, it can feel complex, especially for new users, and navigation between different sections coul...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center serves as my primary tool for centralized firewall policy management and monitoring security events across multiple devices. On a daily basis, I use it to ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Firewall Manager vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Compared 26% of the time

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Compared 14% of the time

AlgoSec vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Compared 11% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Security Cloud Control vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Compared 9% of the time

More Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

October 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

October 2026

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report

Download Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center product report

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is a robust platform with features like intrusion prevention and centralized management, enhancing security with compatibility across Cisco's ecosystem.

Designed for enterprises, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center provides advanced features like application visibility and seamless policy deployment. Its user-friendly design and extensive monitoring capabilities enable effective network management. While it excels in threat intelligence and automation, challenges remain in interface complexity, pricing, and performance. Improved API integration and enhanced user support would bolster its functionality, especially in policy management and monitoring.

What are the key features?

Intrusion Prevention: Provides strong protection against threats.
Centralized Management: Simplifies policy management across networks.
Application Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network applications.
Advanced Threat Detection: Uses Talos intelligence to detect threats.
Seamless Policy Deployment: Facilitates efficient policy application.

What benefits should users expect?

Integration Ease: Compatible with Cisco tools for effective data center protection.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports extensive network oversight for better management.
Efficient Threat Response: Leverages threat intelligence for proactive defense.
Effective Network Segmentation: Ensures secure traffic management between zones.

In financial and healthcare industries, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center optimizes security operations by managing firewalls and ensuring network protection. Its deployment aids in advanced malware detection, supporting compliance with industry regulations and securing sensitive data efficiently.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

September 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.