AWS Lake Formation vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Data Warehouse category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.1, while OpenText is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.2% mindshare in CDW, compared to OpenText’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Lake Formation

Read 21 AWS Lake Formation reviews

2,717 Views
2,119 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Analytics Database...

Read 90 OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) reviews

9,432 Views
3,113 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Lake Formation

OpenText Analytics Database...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) and AWS Lake Formation compete in the data analytics and management sector. Vertica often holds the advantage due to its fast query performance and diverse deployment options, while AWS Lake Formation provides strong integration within the AWS ecosystem.

Features: OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) offers seamless integration with open-source and in-house tools, massive scalability, and fast query performance due to its columnar storage and projections. AWS Lake Formation provides extensive data cataloging, integration with AWS services, and fine-grained access control.

Room for Improvement: Vertica could enhance its community for faster query resolutions, improve documentation, and expand third-party tool integration. AWS Lake Formation can improve its governance features, streamline onboarding, and enhance integration with non-AWS services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vertica is versatile in deployment, supporting private, public, hybrid, and on-premises environments, with excellent customer support. AWS Lake Formation is primarily deployed in public cloud environments with strong AWS ecosystem integration but noted for complex navigation and setup.

Pricing and ROI: Vertica's pricing is high, but offers substantial ROI through efficient storage and cost savings in the long run. AWS Lake Formation's pricing is complex due to its integration with other AWS services but competitive within the AWS ecosystem, despite possibly being more expensive than OpenStack alternatives.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lake Formation vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lake Formation vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Lake Formation

Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Analytics Database...

Ranking in Cloud Data Warehouse

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Data Warehouse category, the mindshare of AWS Lake Formation is 3.2%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) is 5.1%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Warehouse Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Lake Formation	3.2%
OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)	5.1%
Other	91.7%

Cloud Data Warehouse

Featured Reviews

Ciro Baldim Guerra

Sr Analytics Engineer at Itau Unibanco S.A.

Has improved data governance by enabling clear ownership and structured access across teams

In my company, Itaú, we don't utilize all AWS offerings due to rigorous security measures. We operate approximately six to eight months behind other available services. I'm uncertain if gaps exist because of this limitation, though the system functions effectively for us. AWS Lake Formation offers column-level access control for databases, but we haven't implemented this feature either because it hasn't been approved by our compliance, governance, or security areas. In our current setup, everyone from my business unit uses the same consumer account. When access is requested for a table, everyone using that business unit account receives access. This could present a security concern, though it benefits new team members who automatically receive all necessary access permissions. However, I struggle to identify specific improvements needed in AWS Lake Formation.

Read full review

Jitendrak Naik

consultant at tcs

Data warehousing has transformed reporting performance and now delivers near real-time insights

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) is a very powerful analytic database, but like any platform, there are areas where it can improve to make daily work even smoother. Better cloud-native experience is one area for improvement. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) was originally designed as an on-premises analytic database and later moved to cloud. Improvement opportunities include more seamless cloud-native features such as auto-scaling, serverless options, and easier cluster management. Competitors such as Snowflake and BigQuery provide more fully managed experiences. Easier UI is another area for improvement. Most administration is currently done by SQL and command line tools. An improvement opportunity would be a more modern web UI for monitoring, workload management, and troubleshooting. Faster ecosystem and community growth is needed. In short, OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) could improve in areas such as cloud-native capability, modern UI for administration, stronger real-time streaming integration, and growing its ecosystem and community. These enhancements would make it easier to manage and adopt compared to newer cloud-first analytic platforms. From a day-to-day operational perspective, there are a few areas where OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) could improve to make our work smoother. Smarter automatic projection management is needed with more intelligence, auto projection creation, automatic optimization, and reduced manual testing with better workload management. Right now, monitoring queries often requires system tables and manual analysis. Troubleshooting slow queries takes time. A modern real-time dashboard showing query bottlenecks and resource users would enable quick detection. The impact could be faster issue resolution and less time spent debugging performance. Storage native interaction with modern data tools is also important. In short, from a day-to-day perspective, improvements in automatic projection optimization, better workload monitoring dashboard, easier schema evolution, and stronger modern tool integration would significantly reduce manual tuning effort and improve developer productivity. While OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) is very powerful, these enhancements would make it more efficient for the analytics team.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite good at handling analytics. It's done a good job at helping us centralize them."

"AWS Lake Formation has several valuable features that enhance data management, and one particularly beneficial aspect is how it facilitates better collaboration within data teams."

"The solution has many features that are applicable to events such as audits."

"AWS Lake Formation works hand in hand with other products."

"AWS Lake Formation lets you see all your data and tables on one screen."

"I can easily move data from cold storage to regular storage."

"The most important advantage in using AWS Lake Formation is its ability to connect the data lake to the other technologies in AWS. This is what I advise my clients."

"The features and capabilities of AWS Lake Formation that I have found most valuable are that it is really convenient to see all the different data assets that were configured and understand who has and what type of service has or does not have access to those services."

More AWS Lake Formation pros

"Its projections and encoding are excellent tools for tuning large volumes."

"By tuning the model (projection design) you get incredible performance."

"After upgrading to latest version, VBR backup used to take more than one week to back up 70 TB of data and now it is taking about 48 hours."

"The most valuable feature is the merge function, which is essentially the upsert function, and it has become our ELT pattern because, unlike when we used the ETL tool to manage upserts, the load time is now pretty much flat relative to the volume of records processed."

"The compute and processing engine returns the queries fast and let us use our analysis resources in a better utilization."

"OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) has improved our reporting performance by nearly 90 percent, reduced ETL processing time by more than half, and saved around 70 percent in storage through compression."

"Certain research which was unattainable beforehand, now is in reach."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) pros

Cons

"Rather than creating an additional hundred tools, optimizing a tool to have a centralized location to do governance would be beneficial."

"The initial onboarding process is challenging because creating a plan takes a month to a month and a half to build out."

"The main challenge we faced with AWS Lake Formation was related to cross-account sharing. Granting access to other AWS accounts for tables or databases in a different AWS account was somewhat difficult."

"In our experience what could be improved are not the support, performance or monitoring, but at a managerial level, the very expensive professional services of AWS. This could be an area of improvement for them. It's too expensive to acquire their support."

"AWS Lake Formation's pricing could be cheaper."

"I haven't seen any measurable benefits from using AWS Lake Formation, such as time saving, resource saving, or efficiency improvements."

"It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data."

"I would appreciate online support, which I don't have access to in my corporation at the bank, so that is important."

More AWS Lake Formation cons

"They could improve on customer service."

"One feature, which has really benefited us, is the scalability offered by Vertica as it has enabled Pythian's clients to manage data with agility."

"I have found that coding support could be simplified."

"It would be great if this were a managed service in AWS."

"There are a lot of limitations within this product and it makes things extremely hard for developers. It lacks Stored Procedure, packages, and triggers like other RDBMs."

"Vertica seems to scale well, except for one use case where you are on a multi-node cluster. For example, if you had a nine-node cluster, one node goes down, then the eight nodes don't scale, because the absence of the node is very apparent, which is a problem. If you have nine nodes or multiple nodes, the whole idea is that if one of those nodes goes down, then you should not see an impact on the system if you have enough capacity. Even though we have enough capacity, you can still see the impact of the one node going down."

"It's hard to make it slow for a small data volume. For large volumes, it's hard to make it work. It's also hard to make it faster, and to make it scale."

"Suboptimal projection design causes queries to not scale linearly."

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."

"It's difficult today to compete with open-source solutions. In these areas, there is a lot of competition and the price of this solution is a bit pricy."

"Vertica has a perpetual license, but they are currently trying to convert all those licenses to subscription-based licenses on a yearly basis."

"Vertica is an expensive tool."

"The price is reasonable. We use a pay per license model. Firstly, you need to buy a license. After that, you mainly pay the annual support fee of around 20% or 25%. I think their prices are quite reasonable."

"The first TB is free and you can use all the Vertica features. After 1TB you have to pay for licensing. The product is worth it, but be aware of this condition, and plan. The compression ratio is explained in the documentation."

"The pricing could improve, it is a little expensive."

"The solution is free and we pay for the storage."

"It's free up to three nodes and 1TB, and then get in contact with their sales guys."

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	43

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lake Formation?

I don't understand much about the pricing of AWS Lake Formation, but I know how to search for the cost of Glue jobs, and I use the calculator in Amazon. I use a tool to preview the cost based on th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Lake Formation?

Regarding areas of AWS Lake Formation that could be improved or enhanced, I prefer not to answer, mainly because I do not believe that I would be the most valuable person to ask, as I have not used...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Lake Formation?

My usual use cases for AWS Lake Formation involved securing and governing the data resources that we configured in AWS, but we did not use the analytics or machine learning capabilities specificall...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vertica?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is limited because the organization handled the licensing and pricing as well as the cost setup.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vertica?

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) is already doing great. There could be a community which could have been much more advanced and more people can be engaged so that any kind of questions, queri...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vertica?

The main use case for OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) is that we have the Hive and a Hadoop layer for data availability, and Vertica serves as a big data solution. Within a Hive table, OpenTe...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon Redshift vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 12% of the time

Snowflake vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 11% of the time

Databricks vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 9% of the time

BigQuery vs AWS Lake Formation

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Lake Formation Competitors

Teradata vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 4% of the time

SAP IQ vs OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lake Formation

October 2026

Download AWS Lake Formation product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

October 2026

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) report

Download OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Vertica, HPE Vertica, HPE Vertica on Demand

Overview

AWS Lake Formation streamlines data lake organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS services, ensuring robust access control, and facilitating effective data management. Its extensible framework and centralized data handling make it ideal for cloud environments that require scalability.

AWS Lake Formation offers comprehensive data synchronization with AWS, robust security through fine-grained policies, and seamless team collaboration tools. It centralizes data assets, supports analytics with Glue, and enhances data mesh structures. Its IAM integration supports efficient governance, with reliable data storage and retrieval backed by extensive documentation. While highly efficient within AWS ecosystems, Lake Formation faces integration challenges with third-party libraries, and users experience clutter in its interface. Aspects such as automation, policy management, and debugging are areas for improvement. Enhancements in orchestration, cross-account sharing, and integrations with services like SageMaker are user recommendations.

What are the key features of AWS Lake Formation?

Data Synchronization: Integrates with AWS services for seamless data management.
Security Policies: Implements fine-grained access control for secure data handling.
Team Collaboration: Facilitates cooperation through centralized data management.
Analytics Support: Enhances data processing with Glue integration.
Extensibility: IAM integration allows scalable governance.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Scalability: Efficiently manages expanding data volumes.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces cloud data management expenses.
Data Security: Ensures compliance with robust policies.
Comprehensive Support: Access to detailed documentation and AWS resources.

Organizations utilize AWS Lake Formation across various industries to build and manage data lakes, ensuring effective data governance and storage solutions. It helps integrate and transform data, control permissions, and support analytics. From e-commerce to healthcare, AWS Lake Formation delivers centralized data repositories for structured and unstructured data, securing information while providing scalable infrastructure and efficient resource management.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenText Analytics Database Vertica is known for its fast data loading and efficient query processing, providing scalability and user-friendliness with a low cost per TB. It supports large data volumes with OLAP, clustering, and parallel ingestion capabilities.

OpenText Analytics Database Vertica is designed to handle substantial data volumes with a focus on speed and efficient storage through its columnar architecture. It offers advanced performance features like workload isolation and compression, ensuring flexibility and high availability. The database is optimized for scalable data management, supporting data scientists and analysts with real-time reporting and analytics. Its architecture is built to facilitate hybrid deployments on-premises or within cloud environments, integrating seamlessly with business intelligence tools like Tableau. However, challenges such as improved transactional capabilities, optimized delete processes, and better real-time loading need addressing.

What features define OpenText Analytics Database Vertica?

Fast Data Loading: Quickly ingests large data volumes.
Columnar Storage: Optimizes storage efficiency and speed.
OLAP Support: Provides robust analytics capabilities.
Advanced Compression: Enhances storage efficiency and performance.
Parallel Data Ingestion: Enables faster data processing.
Fault Tolerance: Ensures high availability and reliability.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Low cost per TB is advantageous.
Scalability: Accommodates growing data needs seamlessly.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with BI tools like Tableau.
Real-Time Reporting: Delivers immediate insights for decision-making.

OpenText Analytics Database Vertica's implementation spans industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. It serves as a central data warehouse offering scalable management, high-speed processing, and geospatial functions. Companies benefit from its capacity to integrate machine learning and operational reporting, enhancing analytical capabilities.

OpenText

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday

Cerner, Game Show Network Game, Guess by Marciano, Supercell, Etsy, Nascar, Empirix, adMarketplace, and Cardlytics.

Buyer's Guide

AWS Lake Formation vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

September 2026

Free Report: AWS Lake Formation vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica)

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lake Formation vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Lake Formation vs. OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.