

AWS WAF and Radware Cloud WAF Service compete in the web application firewall category. AWS WAF has the upper hand in cloud-native integration, while Radware excels in threat protection.
Features: AWS WAF offers scalability and integration with AWS services, flexibility in WAF rules management, and cloud-native integration. Radware Cloud WAF Service provides robust threat protection, API Discovery, and a CDN feature, offering comprehensive security measures.
Room for Improvement: AWS WAF users suggest enhancements in rule complexity automation, better support and documentation, and cost optimization. Radware could improve tool integration, streamline automated analytics, and enhance support speed and reporting simplification.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS WAF benefits from simplicity in deployment and cloud compatibility, though customer service feedback varies. Radware's deployment is straightforward but faces integration challenges; their support is responsive but requires improvement in complex setups.
Pricing and ROI: AWS WAF pricing follows a flexible pay-as-you-go model, becoming costly with increased usage. Radware offers modular pricing, with bundled services adding value. Both products demonstrate positive ROI through security breach prevention, with AWS focusing on integration and Radware on threat protection.
I wouldn't be able to give a number, but Radware Cloud WAF does save time for our staff due to the automation and excellent detection, which is invaluable.
With our on-prem solution, we spent a lot of time on maintenance tasks, OS updates, and ensuring appliances ran smoothly, but with Cloud WAF, all that is managed by the cloud team, allowing us to focus on alert analysis.
We get major insights from the analytics rules and dashboards, allowing us to pinpoint main issues.
Resolving issues can take time because the support personnel may lack product expertise, leading to delays.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the technical support that Radware provides for Cloud WAF Service a perfect ten.
I would give the Radware technical support a ten out of ten. They are definitely outstanding.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate customer support a ten.
The scalability of Radware Cloud WAF Service rates as a perfect ten out of ten, as we haven't encountered any scaling issues.
The scalability of the Radware Cloud WAF Service deserves a full ten, as it is definitely scalable.
In terms of scalability, it's also a 10 out of 10 because we are using Radware Cloud WAF Service for more than 60,000 employees in our organization, and it works perfectly fine.
In terms of reliability, I would rate AWS WAF about six out of ten due to the need for improved signature sets.
We faced issues with AWS WAF when writing the custom rules.
The stability of AWS WAF is generally good;
The stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service is excellent, and I would rate it as a ten.
The stability of Radware Cloud WAF Service is perfect; I would rate it a ten out of ten.
Regarding stability, I can say that in the last one and a half years, I haven't seen any downtime.
Compared to firewalls, WAFs generally provide limited stateful analysis capabilities.
The way we see it now is just mentioned as a percentage from bots and actual users, which should include proper graphs and detailed information.
The level of granularity is not great, and as you cross a certain threshold, the cost goes up by twenty or thirty percent every time.
It would be beneficial if we could perform POST requests and integrate our applications more effectively.
The documentation is not up to par, as while the platform's system is robust, the documentation, particularly for API integration, could be more developer-friendly with real-world use cases.
To improve Radware Cloud WAF Service, I believe it should enable full application and API coverage to ensure all web applications and APIs, including internal and legacy web services, are onboarded.
Due to our status as an AWS shop, AWS WAF is cost-effective for us, and we benefit from discounts due to our extensive use of AWS services.
The licensing cost for AWS WAF is just pay-as-you-go; it is a service-based model.
Pricing could be more competitive, especially for smaller customers.
I find Radware Cloud WAF to be a quite expensive product compared to others.
The pricing is not cheap; it is expensive, but it is effective.
The biggest benefit of AWS WAF for us is to filter malicious requests, so we can protect our environment and application from malicious actors.
The specific outcomes showing how AWS WAF has helped our organization include improving our security posture by reducing the attack surface and reducing malicious attacks.
The cloud-native nature of AWS is crucial since most of our workload is in AWS, making AWS WAF native to Amazon Web Services.
The most important aspect of Radware Cloud WAF is that it is over the cloud, offering a comprehensive solution that includes WAF, API protection, bots, and Layer 7 DDoS.
It has features such as API security that protect against advanced attacks, including business logic attacks.
The automated analytics for looking at events in Radware Cloud WAF Service are working for us; the automatic event correlation is very beneficial to analyze how the alerts and events occur and visualize the patterns of network traffic and other traffic going in and out from the application via Radware Cloud WAF Service.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Radware Cloud WAF Service | 1.6% |
| AWS WAF | 3.9% |
| Other | 94.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 50 |
AWS WAF provides configurable rules, integration with AWS services, and scalable protection against web threats like SQL injections and DDoS attacks. Its automation and reliable performance are highly valued by users.
AWS WAF is a web application firewall offering significant security features like geo-restriction, custom rules, and IP filtering. Designed for seamless orchestration within AWS environments, it facilitates easy configuration and threat automation. Users benefit from its security policies, enhancing application performance by protecting against threats such as cross-site scripting. Despite its strengths, there is a call for enhanced user interfaces, better documentation, flexible pricing, and improved support. Expanding features like real-time analysis, bot protection, and AI integration can further elevate its utility.
What are the key features of AWS WAF?AWS WAF is extensively used in industries hosting applications on AWS, protecting sensitive data, and monitoring for unauthorized access. Custom and managed rules help cater to infrastructure needs, serving a vital role in maintaining application security across various sectors.
Radware Cloud Application Protection Services is a cloud-delivered service that protects web applications and APIs across all environments against any type of application layer attack. It includes an advanced WAF, bot and AI agent trust management, account takeover protection, API security, DDoS protection, LLM firewall, vulnerability management, threat intelligence, and client-side protection. It uses AI-driven behavioral analysis to distinguish legitimate from malicious traffic and automatically adapt security policies, protecting against known vectors such as the OWASP Top 10, API Top 10, Top 21 automated threats, LLM Top 10, and more, as well as business logic attacks and supply chain attacks on the client side. The service is delivered through a global network of points of presence and scrubbing centers, using a proprietary API-based architecture that also allows for deployment without DNS changes, traffic rerouting, or SSL key sharing. It supports on-premises, private cloud, public cloud, and hybrid environments, helps organizations comply with standards such as PCI DSS 4, NIS2, GDPR, HIPAA, and DORA, and includes threat intelligence and 24x7 managed security support.
Radware Cloud Application Protection Services are offered through a subscription-based pricing model, with fees determined by selected service tiers and specific application coverage required by the client. The service is structured to provide different levels of protection and features, and cost is typically based on factors such as the number of applications, bandwidth usage, and specific security functionalities included in the chosen package.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.