

Devo and BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps are both prominent platforms in the IT operations management category. Devo seems to have an edge with its Activeboards feature, while BMC Helix's strength lies in its integrated AI capabilities for predictive monitoring.
Features: Devo stands out with its Activeboards, enabling visualization and querying of both structured and unstructured data, a high-speed search capability, and real-time analytics, which are crucial for security analysis. BMC Helix is notable for its intelligent monitoring capabilities, AI and machine learning integration, and comprehensive risk management features.
Room for Improvement: Devo users report performance issues with browser-based functionalities during extensive searches and a need for stronger third-party integrations. Enhancing ITSM maturity and documentation for understanding advanced features are areas for BMC Helix to improve. Devo's visual analytics require more user customization, whereas BMC Helix could benefit from improved licensing flexibility and clearer setup procedures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers substantial deployment flexibility across public, private, and hybrid cloud environments, and its customer service is generally well-regarded, with room for faster response times. BMC Helix also excels in adaptability across varied environments and provides professional technical support during complex deployments, though Devo maintains a customer-first approach.
Pricing and ROI: Devo's pricing is based on data ingestion, favored for competitive costs per gigabyte and suitable for dynamic environments. However, metadata processing costs have raised concerns. BMC Helix’s higher pricing is seen as justifiable due to its extensive feature set and AI-driven functionalities, which can yield significant ROI through proactive monitoring and effective incident resolution.
That gave us a very positive image as an agile vendor that came in and brought a highly valuable solution that drove cost reduction, that drove better return on investment, that drove more business confidence and highly automated spectrum and also it did improve overall cybersecurity aspects of the operations as well.
The return on investment with BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps has been positive since I have saved money by resolving incidents or tickets before breaches.
However, when assessed against the benefits and positive outcomes it yields, particularly when applied to critical business systems, an ROI can validate the investment in the platform.
Devo gives value to the end user and is saving compared to other products in the same category.
In terms of return on investment with Devo, I'd say it has been costly due to the need for support and the overtime required for issues experienced at the beginning of the project.
We achieve early identification of security incidents that could potentially breach the customer environment, which would have been costly.
When provided with accurate information, they quickly supply the necessary articles to resolve problems.
They provided detailed explanations about the issues and how to handle them in the future.
If there is any issue or we face anything, they interact immediately to solve it.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Both response time and support quality need attention.
Technical support from Devo is helpful.
BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps is suitable for small, medium, and large environments.
The scalability of BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps is very much up-to-date and competitive in the market.
BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps is highly scalable as it operates in a Kubernetes environment.
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Devo's scalability has its challenges.
Regarding Devo's scalability, its horizontal scalability is quite good with no significant hassle.
If the data is not good, BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps may be unreliable, so it is crucial to ensure that foundation data is synchronized before implementing BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps.
BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps is very stable.
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
I would like to see full AI implementation with their own AI engine in BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps, eliminating the need for external engines, allowing for deeper technical engagement with users.
I would like to see log aggregation built in for the ML analytics capability to be furthermore accurate, along with improved visualizations, insights, and interactive dashboarding.
From my perspective as a customer, especially from tool administration, what would be beneficial is having end-to-end visibility all on a single page.
It's hard for us to keep pace since our original use case was 250 to 500 megabytes a day, and then it became two terabytes a day.
Integrating custom parsing and mapping for non-standard logs is essential due to compatibility challenges with various technologies.
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
The pricing is on the higher end due to the extensive features and delivery quality.
Broadly speaking, it's slightly on the expensive side, though it's very high value.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps indicates that pricing seems to be on the higher side.
The pricing could be simpler, and while the initial setup cost for a new instance is a bit expensive, the licensing can currently be user-based or driven by log volume, which is better if there is expansion of our user base.
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps.
Proactive monitoring is a key feature where AI and machine learning, based on past behavior, predict and provide information on potential situations that could develop.
BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps has positively impacted my organization by reducing our emergency changes and flipping our problem records from reactive to proactive, so we're getting to things faster before they impact users.
Without AIOps in your infrastructure, it typically takes approximately two hours to understand an outcome of a critical system, but with AIOps, you can accomplish this in minutes without gathering all the specialists.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
It utilizes 400 days of hot data, allowing queries to run very fast and yield results quicker than other tools in terms of security and SIEM capability.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps | 2.8% |
| Devo | 2.0% |
| Other | 95.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps delivers AI-driven event correlation, proactive monitoring, and automation, reducing mean time to resolution and alert noise.
BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps integrates features that enhance operational agility, like dashboards and ITSM integration. Its agentless architecture simplifies monitoring infrastructure, while advanced analytics enable quicker problem detection. It provides benefits such as reduced downtimes, improved asset visibility, and seamless cloud integration. However, challenges remain with ease of use, integration, and GUI intuitiveness. Enhancements in dashboard customization, root cause analysis, and better documentation are needed. The licensing model is costly, requiring more flexible options.
What Are the Key Features of BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps?In industries like IT and telecommunications, BMC Helix Operations Management with AIOps is implemented for proactive event monitoring and anomaly detection. Companies leverage its AI and machine learning capabilities for root cause analysis and automation, integrating monitoring tools to reduce noise. It supports capacity management, infrastructure health checks, and predictive analytics, streamlining incident management and operational efficiency in complex IT environments.
Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.
Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.
What are Devo's most important features?Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.