Catchpoint vs SysTrack comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Catchpoint and Lakeside Software are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Catchpoint is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Lakeside Software is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. Catchpoint holds a 5.3% mindshare in DEM, compared to Lakeside Software’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Lakeside Software users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 24 Catchpoint reviews

6,016 Views
1,023 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SysTrack

Read 11 SysTrack reviews

2,613 Views
2,613 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

SysTrack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Catchpoint and SysTrack both compete in IT performance and monitoring. Catchpoint appears more advantageous in terms of pricing and support, while SysTrack excels with its extensive feature set.

Features: Catchpoint provides transaction monitors on API and UI, an alert notification system, and an intuitive dashboard for monitoring user experience. SysTrack offers robust endpoint performance monitoring, user behavior analytics, and a comprehensive telemetry data collection feature.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint could enhance its global monitoring capabilities, expand synthetic monitoring options, and improve real-time visibility features. SysTrack may benefit from simplifying its user interface, improving initial data integration processes, and providing more intuitive analytic tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint is simple to deploy with helpful customer service support, allowing quick setup. SysTrack, though potentially complex in deployment, offers extensive resources and support for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint is competitively priced, offering a good ROI for essential performance monitoring needs. SysTrack, with higher setup costs, justifies its pricing through detailed analytics and efficient endpoint management ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. SysTrack Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. SysTrack

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (13th), Network Monitoring Software (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)

SysTrack

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 5.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SysTrack is 6.9%, down from 12.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	5.3%
SysTrack	6.9%
Other	87.8%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Proactive synthetic monitoring has reduced major incidents and provides global user experience insights

One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications. If an application depends upon MFA for its login flow, Catchpoint doesn't have the ability to bypass or monitor that flow for multi-factor authentication. This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA. This is one of the major areas needing improvement. Otherwise, Catchpoint has been one of the greatest tools in the synthetic monitoring or digital experience monitoring space, and I don't see anything else right now, but MFA is something that certainly needs some improvement.

Read full review

SumitKumar18

Senior SME at Microland Limited

Real-time monitoring and dashboards with cost-saving licensing

SysTrack requires significant improvements. Sometimes clients experience broken links where the service doesn't run on the user's machine, causing outdated data to display. For instance, a machine's last reboot might be inaccurately shown as seven days ago instead of two days ago. Additionally, real-time data syncing issues lead to delays, requiring this to be addressed, as data might be several hours old.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good, as it allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"They only lose two points for the cost; otherwise, the insights they provide are really good."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"We previously tried using Dynatrace, but it was really expensive for us, and when we discovered Catchpoint, we fell in love with it."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

"Overall, Catchpoint has been a strong platform for us to provide proactive digital experience monitoring."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"After using Catchpoint, we were close to 90 percent, where out of ten incidents, just one incident came from a customer, and the remaining were detected by internal sources, especially with Catchpoint."

More Catchpoint pros

"The visualizer feature provides end-to-end analysis on all the machines."

"The Resolve part is valuable. It allows the service desk team to perform a couple of fixes or things to mitigate an incident before it's escalated to L2 or L3. It's a cool feature. If you have the sensor activity for Outlook and something has gone wrong, even the service desk can take those steps."

"We are using the SysTrack 'Prevent' module, which shows real-time discrepancies in the infrastructure."

"It is a stable product. I would rate its stability a nine out of ten."

"This is a powerful digital experience monitoring tool and it tracks everything."

"SysTrack gathers a lot of different metrics on every single device including performance metrics and application-related metrics such as application usage and resource utilization by applications. It collects a wide range of different metrics, and from that perspective, it's a really good tool."

"I am impressed with the huge amount of information that you can get from the infrastructure."

"Cost-wise, SysTrack has a higher rate than other products, such as Nanoheal, but the features that SysTrack has aren't there in any other product available in the market."

More SysTrack pros

Cons

"One improvement for Catchpoint is the detail analysis logs that we struggle to find within the tool."

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."

"Currently, Catchpoint is migrating to a new user interface. My colleagues and I feel that the old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"A large selection of nodes are available but it is a challenge to test reliably in China and the Middle East."

"One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications."

"The only thing that occasionally bugs me about Catchpoint is some aspects of the UI."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

More Catchpoint cons

"SysTrack requires significant improvements. Sometimes clients experience broken links where the service doesn't run on the user's machine, causing outdated data to display."

"The solution lacks AI in its analysis module."

"The tool needs to improve the integration with third-party providers like Cisco products."

"One thing from a layman's standpoint, the report should be very clear."

"SysTrack isn't stable enough. There are too many upgrades, and not all versions are stable."

"There are a lot of issues with the solution and certain features such as the survey feature and sensors, that don't work well and need to be improved."

"Lacks flexibility with regard to licensing."

"Their dashboard could be better. They did it custom, which is the main problem. They should have given an option to integrate it with some of the tools such as Power BI. Unfortunately, they are developing their own native dashboarding capabilities, which is killing them, in my view. The product is good, but dashboarding has been a pain area. I have to literally learn a new BI or dashboarding solution just for a system. We have 100 such kinds of solutions in our environment. If every solution has its custom solution for dashboarding, we can't survive. It is going to be crazy."

More SysTrack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"It is on a per-device basis. It is not on a per-user basis. I was not much engaged in the licensing piece. I was only a part of the conversation about how we are going to scale up or down, but its price, for sure, is competitive."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"If you compare cloud solutions to SysTrack, which is on-premises, then SysTrack is cheaper. If you compare the cost of SysTrack with that of other similar solutions, the cost is similar. For each master server, there's a license. In terms of end user devices, the licenses are sold in multiplications of 10. That's one upfront cost. Once you procure the license, you can use the software for as long as you like. The maintenance is sold on an annual basis. Additional costs are related to hosting and include a SQL server license and Windows server licenses."

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Cost-wise, SysTrack has a higher rate than other products, such as Nanoheal, but the features that SysTrack has aren't there in any other product available in the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been great. There is always a need to negotiate a bit more to get the best cost for the licenses we plan to buy. We expect better costs fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use cases for Catchpoint are synthetic monitoring and transactions monitoring for different applications. We have a lot of critical tier zero applications where there is a need to have synt...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SysTrack?

SysTrack is considered an affordable solution. On a scale from one to ten, with ten being very cheap, I would rate it as an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SysTrack?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SysTrack?

SysTrack is a digital employee experience platform that we have deployed in our infrastructure without any customized requirements from the client side. Clients seek to reduce the number of service...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 3% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Catchpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Nexthink vs SysTrack

Compared 39% of the time

Alluvio Aternity vs SysTrack

Compared 13% of the time

ControlUp vs SysTrack

Compared 12% of the time

Compared 10% of the time

More SysTrack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

October 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

SysTrack

September 2026

Download SysTrack product report

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

SysTrack offers comprehensive digital experience monitoring for IT environments like VDI and user devices. It provides valuable insights into performance, aiding service desk operations and improving efficiency through metrics tracking and data analysis.

Combining advanced tools for endpoint analysis and service optimization, SysTrack empowers organizations to enhance user experiences. Its features like Black Box, Resolve, and data capture improve performance insights, while virtual machine planning and incident mitigation streamline operations. Despite its robust toolkit, challenges exist in integration with third-party tools such as Dynatrace and Power BI. Users advocate for improved dashboards and centralized management consoles to optimize efficiency. Real-time data synchronization remains a focus area for future enhancements.

What are SysTrack's key features?

Black Box and Resolve: Provides critical insights to help diagnose performance issues.
GUI and Data Capture: Enhances endpoint analysis through detailed data collections.
Self-Help and Monitoring Dashboards: Assists service desk operations efficiently.
Virtual Machine Planning: Facilitates better infrastructure utilization and planning.
Automated Incident Mitigation: Streamlines the response to technical problems.
Infrastructure Insights: Aids in license management and cost-saving strategies.

What benefits and ROI should organizations expect?

Enhanced User Experience: Drives operational efficiency through better performance insights.
Reduced Service Desk Load: Enables fewer needed resources for support functions.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resources, reducing overall expenses.
Real-Time Performance Monitoring: Keeps operations smooth with continuous status updates.

SysTrack is widely adopted in industries needing to monitor digital employee experience within VDI environments. Organizations with large-scale deployments, such as those managing thousands of users, benefit significantly from its telemetry and infrastructure performance tracking capabilities. It supports reducing service-related challenges through its comprehensive analysis and proactive insights.

Lakeside Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

HONDA, TATA, General Mills, Ford, Kellogg's, Air Canada

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. SysTrack

September 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. SysTrack

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. SysTrack and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. SysTrack report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.