No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CData Sync vs EDB Postgres Replication Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CData Sync
Ranking in Data Replication
5th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
EDB Postgres Replication Se...
Ranking in Data Replication
19th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of CData Sync is 4.6%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of EDB Postgres Replication Server is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CData Sync4.6%
EDB Postgres Replication Server2.0%
Other93.4%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

AM
Data Analyst
Data workflows have become automated and unified while support and security still need improvement
There are times when you are streaming and trying to connect that CData Sync fails. However, the team has been very helpful. There is a particular technical support person that has usually come to my aid whenever there are issues. For improvement, I think the turnaround time for support can increase, especially on weekends. I want to discuss the security of CData Sync. It is not something I actually have visibility to, but I think if CData Sync could give users the opportunity to put their own security layer on this, that would be beneficial. If CData Sync is compromised, who do we hold responsible? So security is an area for improvement. CData Sync's interface is good. For integration with other tools, I think CData Sync could do well by integrating with other providers, especially AI agents so that one can easily integrate CData Sync to more agents out there.
BharathKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Database Administrator at Cartrack
Beneficial continual replication, helpful support, and high replication performance
The most valuable features of EDB Postgres Replication Server are the many in-built functionalities, such as streaming. When compared to others solutions it is highly secure and does not have any breakage in replication. The replication is very fast. Additionally, in other solutions, the databases need to have a lot of manual intervention but with EDB Postgres Replication Server it is not needed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CData Sync is a good tool."
"CData Sync has impacted my organization positively and immensely as I have been using it for years now with smooth integrations, a really good UI interface, really good support staff, and I have never experienced downtime with the system itself."
"The beautiful thing about CData Sync is that you can preview the data directly on their UI."
"The most valuable features of EDB Postgres Replication Server are the many in-built functionalities, such as streaming. When compared to others solutions it is highly secure and does not have any breakage in replication. The replication is very fast. Additionally, in other solutions, the databases need to have a lot of manual intervention but with EDB Postgres Replication Server it is not needed."
 

Cons

"There are times when you are streaming and trying to connect that CData Sync fails."
"In the area of improvements, within 20 days I would say that if there were a feature where I could add the transformation upfront itself, that would be great."
"I rate it an eight because it can improve on the pricing angle as well as the betterment of storage configuration."
"We tried to set up a reverse master-master set up, but currently, it is not available."
"We tried to set up a reverse master-master set up, but currently, it is not available. it can be done only via logical replication using a paid version of BDR or some other technology. They allow like master-master. MySQL has already supported master-master and streaming."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We have used the paid version of the EDB Postgres Replication Server and the license payments were annual."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CData Sync?
For startup cost, I think it is still fair. Although we are a startup with a lean budget, if the startup cost was expensive, we might not have considered CData Sync at all.
What needs improvement with CData Sync?
In the area of improvements, within 20 days I would say that if there were a feature where I could add the transformation upfront itself, that would be great. For example, if my source is coming in...
What is your primary use case for CData Sync?
The major use case I have for CData Sync is towards the ETL part. The way it works can be summarized in two sentences. Earlier ETLs required that you map a field manually, and if you had any new fi...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
EDB EPRS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

PHILIPS, intel, Heineken, hp, ORACLE, IBM, NOKIA, FedEx, CISCO
Ericsson CMS, KT Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: September 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.