No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Celonis vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Ranking in Process Mining
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
AI Data Analysis (10th)
QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 12.6%, down from 20.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Celonis12.6%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.8%
Other84.6%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

Prateek Rao - PeerSpot reviewer
PARTNER & MANAGING DIRECTOR at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Process intelligence has transformed procurement and order cycles and delivers measurable savings
Celonis can improve in several areas. The initial data modeling and continuous real-time ingestion, especially from non-standard legacy systems, can still be complex and quite resource-intensive, requiring a steep PQL learning curve for non-technical users. Simplifying the interface for business stakeholders would significantly accelerate the process. I think introducing a natural language to query interface would allow business users to query data without writing long PQL. Streamlining guided onboarding flows and offering modular plug-and-play dashboard templates tailored to specific roles would shorten ramp-up time for daily users. I think more transparent and predictable consumption-based pricing models would be helpful as data volume scaling can get costly quickly. I would also love to see native, real-time streaming connectors for unstructured data such as emails and support tickets. The learning curve for new users of Celonis is one of the pain points I raised earlier, and I find it to be quite steep.
reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution really is a leader of the industry in the concept of process mining."
"I prefer Celonis because of its user-friendliness, visualization and process comparison, spaghetti, and user reviews."
"We are trying to optimize all of our organizational processes with this solution, and it gives full visibility of how a process is run end to end."
"It's the first solution that combines business competence and capabilities with technological capabilities."
"Automated root cause analysis and process explorer features are very good. It provides a lot of selections, such as process flow selection, attribute selection, etc."
"In my Celonis experience, it is easy to use and has higher AI capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the PTS service."
"From a features perspective, the discovery and analytics parts of Celonis have been valuable, especially the analytics and all of the out-of-the-box process connectors."
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
 

Cons

"They should leverage the solution's machine learning algorithms."
"I would really appreciate it if Celonis had significant compatibility with robotic process automation solutions. Once they define the process and understand it, streamline it, optimize it, and take inputs around it. When they reconfigure the process, there should be good compatibility with any of the automation tools, wherein I can integrate for robotic process automation, where I can streamline many of these processes on the application itself. Today, I need to extract this process and reload it into other tools, like UiPath, to integrate them with Automation Anywhere. If this tool can provide that efficiency, that would be great. I'm a data analytics guy. I lead a data analytics team. So technically, I would primarily look at if this can give me a visualization opportunity and integrate that in terms of the data."
"The process analytics could be a bit easier."
"The task mining feature of Celonis needs improvement because it's more challenging than it looks."
"The price is high for us."
"The tool must have better process graphs."
"Another area of improvement is implementation. So, in future releases, I would like to see a more streamlined implementation process would be appreciated, making it less time-consuming and more efficient."
"The cost could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is high when compared to other process mining tools."
"The solution’s pricing is based on APC. It charges you based on the amount of GV that you use."
"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."
"Celonis is cost-effective."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The solution is expensive."
"Celonis is expensive. It's not for mid or low-sized enterprises because the license price is high. Overall, it's quite pricey compared to anything else that I have heard about. But the good thing is that they don't charge per user. They charge for the data model."
"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise47
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
Celonis pricing is premium and scales primarily on data ingestion volume (APC/Data Capacity) and process scope rather than user seats, with entry deployments typically running $100K to $250K annual...
What needs improvement with Celonis?
Celonis can improve in several areas. The initial data modeling and continuous real-time ingestion, especially from non-standard legacy systems, can still be complex and quite resource-intensive, r...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.