Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Prisma Access Browser comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 4.3% mindshare in WSG, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Check Point Harmony SASE and Prisma Access Browser compete in the Secure Access Service Edge market. Both offer robust security solutions, but Prisma Access Browser has a slight edge in scalability and integration, while Check Point Harmony SASE is noted for customer support effectiveness.

Features: Check Point Harmony SASE provides strong network security with advanced threat prevention, seamless cloud transitions, and configurable security policies. Prisma Access Browser offers granular access management, cloud firewall services, and extensive scalability with seamless integration in IT infrastructure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, enhancing the adaptation phase for new customers. Prisma Access Browser facilitates a cloud-native deployment that integrates quickly with current systems. Both services ensure efficient implementations with Check Point Harmony SASE excelling in support quality.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexible pricing and a desirable return on investment due to competitive operational costs. Prisma Access Browser requires a higher initial investment but promises long-term savings through optimized resource management. While Check Point Harmony SASE is attractive for upfront costs, Prisma Access Browser can offer better long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of iboss is 3.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 4.3%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prisma Access Browser is 2.3%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iboss	3.2%
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)	4.3%
Prisma Access Browser	2.3%
Other	90.2%

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

Nasseer Qureshi

Pre Sales Consultant at Redington Group

Delivers seamless and secure remote access while enhancing security posture

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers strong features, but there are areas that could be improved. One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers. It works with standard SAML and SSO, but we would prefer deeper integrations with solutions such as Ping for more advanced identity-based policies. Additionally, a mobile-specific client or lightweight agent would be helpful for securing access from smartphones, especially in BYOD environments. We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity. The logs are comprehensive, but filtering them can sometimes feel messy. The user interface on the management portal could be more intuitive, especially when managing multiple sites or remote offices. Some of the policy configuration steps are nested and could be streamlined.

Read full review

reviewer2750658

Consultant Avant Vente Cybersécurité at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Browser security has strengthened web DLP and protects unmanaged devices from data exfiltration

SD-WAN capability is another solution, and it is not Prisma Access Browser; we do not have SD-WAN capability with Prisma Access Browser. I would like to improve the private access to do the ZTNA. I think that Palo Alto has released the versions and integrated the private access in Prisma Access Browser, but I'm not sure. The feature that is missing in Prisma Access Browser is the capability to monitor the private access where a user can access a private app with authentication, posture, and granular access. Regarding the pricing aspect, many customers find that the solution is a little bit expensive. Palo Alto should reconsider the pricing as it is a bit expensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a use-case scenario, what I like the most is the plug-in. I like the fact that we can do the filtering of these devices offsite independent of the network they are connected to, and we do not have to have traffic coming back inside our network."

"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."

"First of all, the security policies are essential. I do not have to rely solely on Active Directory for our users."

"The solution has massively improved our security posture, giving us full visibility into what our staff does online."

"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."

"iboss is easy to use despite its complexity. Multiple engineers manage it, but it's significantly more straightforward to administer than traditional VPNs and web proxies."

"The console is cloud-based, which is something I really appreciate."

"The main advantage of iboss is its cloud-based security centralized policy management, which helps organizations protect users working from different locations, secure access to cloud applications, and reduce security risks."

More iboss pros

"With Perimeter 81, we only need to create a user and install the Perimeter81 application on the computer."

"Harmony Connect is very stable and its performance is good in the production environment."

"Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) has positively impacted my organization by leading to overall security improvements, especially for our VPN users."

"The ease of use not only translates to quick adoption rates - it also ensures that our employees remain compliant with our cybersecurity protocols, enhancing the overall security posture of our organization."

"Overall, the unified agent covers endpoints as well as prevents web browser attacks."

"Its software solution also ensures connectivity and protects against NSF filtering."

"I appreciate the console of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) because everything is well-centralized in one place."

"Perimeter 81 has been a game-changer at my company."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros

"The most interesting use case that interests our customers is the DLP features on Prisma Access Browser; it is a great DLP solution with watermark and prevents data exfiltration."

"Prisma Access Browser improves security because the browser is one of the attack surfaces, it needs more security on the endpoint device and standardization of device usage, and it also helps standardize the access policy to the internet."

"Prisma Access Browser is the most capable, advanced, and flexible product."

Cons

"The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices; it is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents, and that is where in 2025 we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform."

"iboss can be improved because the integration could be better; you need to import all the sites that you access today, and there are a few problems whenever you import thousands of websites, making the integration process messy for the users."

"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."

"Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device and filtering did not always work correctly."

"Their on-premise hardware's network interface is capped at one gigabit, which is sort of a problem. If you stand a filter up where all traffic flows through that, according to them, in order to go above a gigabit, you have to have multiple devices, which in today's IT seems a little bit silly. They could easily put in an SFP port into their device that could accommodate 10 gigs or at least offer a box."

"I appreciate that iboss's single pane of glass console gives centralized visibility into web traffic, user activity, security policies, and alerts from one dashboard, allowing us to quickly investigate incidents and monitor policy violations without switching between multiple tools, improving operational efficiency; however, the dashboard customization and reporting could be more flexible."

"If they could implement an extra security layer preventing access to iboss from the open internet, it would be great."

"The easiest device I have set up was the Barracuda line of products."

More iboss cons

"At times, when I lose connection, I feel that the equipment is slowing me down."

"When it comes to firewall configuration, sometimes we encounter issues."

"Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) could be improved as there's complexity during initial configuration, and there's a learning curve."

"Branding could be better."

"One of our challenges is ensuring the security of our cloud-based operations."

"If Harmony SASE supported bidirectional traffic and the UDP protocol, it would be better."

"Offering in-app explanations detailing what each feature does, its benefits and potential use cases can help users better understand and utilize the tool to its full potential."

"They should work towards the WAN intergration."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons

"In the beginning, the solution may not be very user-friendly and could be complex."

"Regarding the pricing aspect, many customers find that the solution is a little bit expensive."

"The maturity of the product needs improvement as the implementation is very complex."

"On a scale of one to 10, I would rate Palo Alto's customer service or technical support as three. Their support is very poor."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"The solution is priced appropriately considering its uses. For an essential license, a user pays only 30 USD per month. For an enterprise version, the prices can be negotiated with the company."

"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."

"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either."

"Regarding pricing, I can say that the more the number of users, the less they have to pay."

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	53
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

I think iboss could be improved by emphasizing the modular function even more during sales presentations and demonstr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

iboss is primarily used for content filtering within school districts and public K-12 school districts, and it can al...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

My experience with iboss's pricing structure, setup cost, and licensing model has been positive, straightforward, and...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Harmony Connect?

I am not aware of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing, but I would say the setup cost is our resource, and we have...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harmony Connect?

When I'm raising a ticket for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81), it's a bit technical for non-technica...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harmony Connect?

I have experience with this product as a user. Currently, the Check Point product that I worked with mostly was the F...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Prisma Access Browser?

SD-WAN capability is another solution, and it is not Prisma Access Browser; we do not have SD-WAN capability with Pri...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Prisma Access Browser?

We are integrators, and we do not use Prisma Access Browser for our personal use or professional use; we use Prisma A...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Prisma Access Browser?

With granular policy enforcement, we can enforce policy for users, groups of users, or many domains; we can whitelist...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

Lightspeed Filter vs iboss

Compared 2% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 6% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 5% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 3% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 3% of the time

Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Island vs Prisma Access Browser

Compared 44% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Prisma Access Browser

Compared 7% of the time

Google Chrome Enterprise vs Prisma Access Browser

Compared 6% of the time

Menlo Secure vs Prisma Access Browser

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs Prisma Access Browser

Compared 2% of the time

More Prisma Access Browser Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

October 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)

October 2026

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) report

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report

Buyer's Guide

Prisma Access Browser

October 2026

Download Prisma Access Browser product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

Check Point Quantum SASE

No data available

Overview

iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.

Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.

The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.

- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.

- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.

- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.

- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.

- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.

- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.

- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.

- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.

Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.

iboss

Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.

Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?

Split Tunneling: Manages internet traffic more efficiently by routing only necessary data through the VPN.
MFA: Provides an additional layer of security through multi-factor authentication.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure connections by validating every user and device.
ThreatCloud: Enhances protection with real-time threat intelligence.
Firewall as a Service: Protects against unauthorized access and threats.
Secure Web Gateway: Prevents phishing attacks and unauthorized internet access.

How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?

Improved Security: Real-time threat intelligence and robust authentication minimize risks.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control over network security and policies.
Optimized Connectivity: Efficient traffic routing enhances user experience.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT infrastructure, enhancing strategic security deployment.

Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Prisma Access Browser enhances enterprise security with its cloud-delivered architecture, offering secure web access and threat protection for organizational networks through a streamlined interface.

By delivering consistent security through a single platform, Prisma Access Browser provides scalable and flexible protection, ensuring reliability and efficiency. The service prioritizes advanced threat prevention and zero-trust security models to safeguard business applications and user data. Enterprises can confidently operate, knowing their infrastructure withstands evolving digital challenges.

What are the key features of Prisma Access Browser?

Cloud-Delivered Architecture: Provides centralized management and rapid deployment capabilities.
Advanced Threat Prevention: Offers state-of-the-art protection against cyberthreats.
Zero Trust Security: Ensures all data interactions are verified and secure.
Scalable Platform: Adjusts seamlessly to accommodate growing business requirements.

What benefits or ROI should you consider in reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced protection reduces vulnerability to attacks.
Cost Efficiency: Cloud infrastructure minimizes hardware investment.
Operational Agility: Simplified management leads to less downtime and greater efficiency.
Compliance Support: Helps maintain adherence to regulatory standards.

Prisma Access Browser is widely implemented across finance, healthcare, and technology industries for its robust security and deployment speed. Financial institutions value its capacity to protect sensitive transactions, while healthcare providers appreciate the encryption of patient information. In tech, it supports seamless integration with existing IT frameworks.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith

Lemonade, Rapyd, Telit Cinterion, Landry’s, Golden Nugget, Houston Rockets

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser report.

See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.