Check Point Remote Access VPN vs SonicWall Netextender comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and SonicWall are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while SonicWall is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.9% mindshare in EIV, compared to SonicWall’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 70% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.

Check Point Remote Access VPN

Read 87 Check Point Remote Access VPN reviews

8,798 Views
4,311 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

SonicWall Netextender

Read 14 SonicWall Netextender reviews

3,008 Views
2,978 Comparison Views

70% willing to recommend

Check Point Remote Access VPN

SonicWall Netextender

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Check Point Remote Access VPN and SonicWall NetExtender compete in the remote access VPN category. Check Point seems to have an advantage with its robust security integration and centralized management.

Features: Check Point Remote Access VPN seamlessly integrates with Check Point firewalls and Active Directory, offers built-in compliance checks and multifactor authentication, and provides centralized management for cohesive security. SonicWall NetExtender is renowned for its ease of use, stable SSL VPN connections, and quality encryption, which simplifies training for non-tech-savvy users.

Room for Improvement: Check Point could enhance its client installation and update processes for non-Windows systems, improve Linux integration, and increase automation in client deployment. SonicWall NetExtender requires improvements in user interface design, connection reliability, and credential management. Both can improve in user configuration streamlining and device compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point offers versatile deployment across on-premises and hybrid cloud environments with commendable technical support, though responsiveness varies regionally. SonicWall NetExtender offers straightforward on-premises deployment and generally positive support but lacks depth for more complex technical issues.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point's pricing is competitive but may be higher due to its comprehensive features, offering significant ROI by enabling flexible remote work. SonicWall NetExtender is more budget-friendly with straightforward licensing, appealing to cost-sensitive setups. While both provide ROI, Check Point's broader security ecosystem may justify its higher cost for advanced needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. SonicWall Netextender Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. SonicWall Netextender

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (6th)

SonicWall Netextender

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

12th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 2.9%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Netextender is 2.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point Remote Access VPN	2.9%
SonicWall Netextender	2.2%
Other	94.9%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

Sadashiv Khanapur

Territory Business Manager at Emcure NZ Limited

Remote access has transformed my hybrid work and now provides secure, fast connections anywhere

The best feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the easy connectivity. I just have to enter the gateway and the username and password, then click on connect and it will be connected to my organization network. The process is very straightforward and the remote control is outstanding with great connectivity. The remote control feature makes my work easier because there is no latency I am experiencing while accessing from a remote site. I mainly access two to three servers at a time, and I have not seen any lag or latency through Check Point Remote Access VPN. That is outstanding about Check Point Remote Access VPN solution. Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization because productivity has increased.

Read full review

Rich Darress

Chief Operating Officer at Darress Tech

Has provided secure remote access to multiple client networks with consistent performance

When buying the appliance itself, there is one downside that isn't exclusive to SonicWall. When you apply all the security settings, many people have one gig connections for internet ISP. If you're bringing in a one gig connection, you have to have a more robust SonicWall to handle that throughput with all your security settings turned on. It gets pretty pricey upfront if you're bringing in a one gig connection. If the customer starts with a two, three, four, or 500 meg connection and has a small unit, they have to replace the whole box when upgrading to a gig, so scalability there is atrocious. However, this issue exists with pretty much any appliance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is stable most of the time."

"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team of the solution is very good."

"The security and reliability we are receiving are exceptional."

"The most important feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is the multiple factor authentication."

"Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization because we can connect our resources remotely with a secure network and secure channel."

"The majority of people say how excellent the remote access VPN service is and they stated that once connected to a VPN service, they never experience connectivity problems."

"The capacity that Check Point Remote Access VPN offers is one of the best, and it has made it easier for us and the team to have great mobility inside and outside the organization."

"The most valuable feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is its ability to deploy. It follows the same process as their stateful inspection firewall or IPS. If you know how to enable one feature, you can enable and configure others. The learning curve isn't steep."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN pros

"It can support multifactor authentication. Also, it is a very basic application."

"One of the most valuable features of SonicWall Netextender is the integration of VPN accounts with Microsoft Identity Management, which enables us to enforce secure access through Microsoft Intune and conditional access policies. This helps ensure that only authorized individuals are able to access the VPN, rather than anyone with knowledge of a password."

"The product has two-factor authentication."

"The product is very cost-effective; for the price-sensitive market, this is a very good product for an SSL VPN solution."

"It allows us to work remotely."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"It's a stable tool that does what it is supposed to do."

"The solution provides high availability."

More SonicWall Netextender pros

Cons

"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."

"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."

"Check Point Remote Access VPN's enterprise support could be improved."

"Sometimes it will be disconnected, but it's a good solution."

"Sometimes, we have noticed that owing to installation of various antivirus and running of inbuilt firewalls, the connection for VPN sporadically drops and tries to reconnect."

"Generally, the license is included with the Check Point gateway licensing, however, in terms of the number of users that can be activated for use, it is generally five users."

"Knowledge base documentation can be upgraded."

"For Linux machines, they don't have a full client to install. For the users that utilize Linux, there needs to be an equivalent."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN cons

"NetExtender did nothing to improve my organization - in fact, it was quite the opposite. Users constantly complained of lag and unbearable sluggishness (with a max speed of 10-30kbps) through the VPN, even though we have relatively high bandwidth for a small office (400mbps)."

"The UI could be a little better."

"In future releases, introductions of AI features would be really helpful."

"The solution takes more bandwidth these days and it would be helpful if that was reduced."

"They need to rewrite the software to make it a usable product."

"The initial setup of SonicWall Netextender is straightforward. The only issue we encountered was with relocating the VPN appliance. If we needed to move it from an on-premise to an on-cloud architecture, we had to start over and redeploy it from scratch. Unfortunately, it is not portable and any changes to its physical location often result in the need for a fresh deployment to ensure everything functions properly."

"I am rolling out the new Netextender because I am having some issues with the older version."

"There must be a multi-factor authentication enabled or integrated by default with it in order to be integrated with NetExtender."

More SonicWall Netextender cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is good."

"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."

"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."

"I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually."

"The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a ten out of ten. For the cost of one product, we could purchase two or three Fortinet solutions with the same amount of money."

"Check Point Remote Access VPN is not expensive and the cost is annual."

"Organizations that already have the Check Point NGFW need to purchase an additional license to have access to the VPN functionality."

"The solution is pretty expensive. The rating is an eight."

More Check Point Remote Access VPN pricing and cost advice

"Compared to others, it is cheaper. When we compare it with Palo Alto, Check Point, or Fortinet, it is a little cheaper."

"Cost wise, it would be a few hundred dollars for the base appliance with the first five clients. Then from there, your cost per seat depends on how many you're getting. It's a one-time cost, and then you have a few hundred dollars a year for the maintenance contract once you get the one-time seat costs out of the way."

"The price of SonicWall Netextender is reasonable. Whether it's a small shop with only five users or a larger operation with 130 users, we have received no complaints or objections regarding cost from any of the clients we are looking to deploy it with."

"You have to pay for its license. There are some other companies that provide a VPN client for free. When you buy NetExtender, its license is available for one, three, or five years."

"The solution has a pretty good price."

"The solution is cheap itself, not too costly."

"After a certain number of users, you require extra licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

28%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	30
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?

The main improvement I see for Check Point Remote Access VPN would be a cleaner, more modern interface. It works well, but a streamlined UI would make the day-to-day even smoother.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?

Check Point Remote Access VPN is used to provide employees access to internal corporate resources when they are working from home or outside the office. The finance team and HR team securely connec...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?

Check Point Remote Access VPN is working fine for us, and I have not seen any lacking features. Check Point Remote Access VPN is on-premises, which is a feature of the security gateway. We have bee...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SonicWall Netextender?

The pricing for my experience with the setup cost and licensing of SonicWall Netextender is fair. The Netextender itself has no cost. It's the SSL licensing that is attached to the SonicWall. It us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SonicWall Netextender?

SonicWall Netextender has not helped with compliance, as it is not applicable for what I'm doing. I've put several feature requests in over the years and they've implemented them all, so it current...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SonicWall Netextender?

Getting to local resources on a customer's network is my main use case with SonicWall Netextender or SonicWall SSL-VPN. As a managed service provider, all my customers have SonicWalls and I get int...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenVPN Access Server vs Check Point Remote Access VPN

Compared 9% of the time

Tailscale vs Check Point Remote Access VPN

Compared 7% of the time

TeamViewer vs Check Point Remote Access VPN

Compared 6% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Check Point Remote Access VPN

Compared 5% of the time

Claroty Platform vs Check Point Remote Access VPN

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Remote Access VPN Competitors

OpenVPN Access Server vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 18% of the time

SonicWall Connect Tunnel vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiClient vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall Mobile Connect vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 7% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs SonicWall Netextender

Compared 6% of the time

More SonicWall Netextender Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Remote Access VPN

October 2026

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN product report

Buyer's Guide

SonicWall Netextender

September 2026

Download SonicWall Netextender product report

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN

No data available

Overview

Check Point Remote Access VPN enables secure connectivity from remote locations with features like strong encryption and multifactor authentication. Its compatibility with multiple devices ensures operational flexibility for employees and partners accessing corporate resources.

Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates with current firewalls, providing robust security and seamless management. It supports effective remote work with centralized control, allowing users to connect securely from anywhere. While valued for its ease of use and stable performance, it faces limitations in Linux support and requires improved documentation. High-load performance inconsistencies and installation complexities are areas for development. Its adaptability to diverse systems, including cloud integration, offers scalable connectivity solutions.

What are the key features?

Seamless Integration: Works with existing firewalls for streamlined operations.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Provides strong security measures.
Centralized Management: Efficient control and log management via SmartPortal.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances productivity and ease of use.
Device Compatibility: Supports multiple devices for flexible operations.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Ensures secure remote connections with encryption.
Increased Productivity: Stability and ease of use facilitate efficient remote work.
Infrastructure Cost Savings: No need for additional hardware investments.
Operational Flexibility: Supports diverse device access for improved scalability.

Organizations in industries like technology and finance implement Check Point Remote Access VPN to maintain secure remote connectivity for employees and partners. By enabling access to internal resources and applications, they support effective remote work and adhere to stringent data security standards, particularly during increased remote working demands or business travel scenarios.

Check Point Software Technologies

SonicWall Netextender provides affordable and stable VPN connections with a focus on secure access through features like multifactor authentication and integration with Microsoft services, ensuring reliable remote connectivity.

SonicWall Netextender is a robust tool for managing VPN accounts securely while offering remote access integration with Microsoft solutions like Intune. It supports industries such as healthcare, education, and insurance, catering to remote work and hybrid arrangements. Its comprehensive documentation aids in efficient configuring and minimal latency, although it faces challenges with Mac OS support, outdated interfaces, and high bandwidth usage. Enhanced SaaS functionalities and improved support for AI features are sought after improvements.

What are SonicWall Netextender's key features?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides a budget-friendly solution for enterprise VPN connections.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing organizational needs.
SSL-VPN Encryption: Utilizes advanced encryption for data security.
Microsoft Integration: Seamlessly connects with Microsoft Intune and Identity Management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Remote Access Security: Maintains security with multifactor authentication.
Ease of Use: Detailed documentation facilitates easy setup and management.
High Availability: Supports stable connections with minimal downtime.
Efficiency: Helpful in managing VPN accounts and access control.

SonicWall Netextender is utilized in industries such as healthcare, education, and insurance to enable remote work and access to office resources. Its integration with Microsoft 365 supports file transfers and remote management of hybrid work environments, although some find it costly compared to free options.

SonicWall

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. SonicWall Netextender

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. SonicWall Netextender

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. SonicWall Netextender and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. SonicWall Netextender report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.