Check Point SandBlast Network vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Check Point Software Technologies and Trellix are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.7, while Trellix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 3.3% mindshare in ATP, compared to Trellix’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Check Point SandBlast Network

Read 41 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

3,708 Views
3,523 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Read 9 Trellix Advanced Threat Defense reviews

1,935 Views
1,645 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Check Point SandBlast Network

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Check Point SandBlast Network and Trellix Advanced Threat Defense are key players in cybersecurity, each providing distinct capabilities in threat detection. While Trellix seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, Check Point enjoys better feedback regarding pricing and support.

Features: Check Point SandBlast Network is known for powerful threat emulation, effective zero-day threat mitigation, and seamless integration across diverse network environments. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense distinguishes itself with robust behavioral analytics, comprehensive anomaly detection, and advanced machine learning capabilities, providing greater threat visibility.

Room for Improvement: Check Point could improve by enhancing its feature depth in behavioral analytics, providing more robust anomaly detection, and expanding its machine learning capabilities. Trellix, on the other hand, might benefit from simplifying deployment processes, optimizing the integration across varied environments, and reducing upfront costs to improve cost-effectiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point SandBlast Network is easier to deploy, requiring minimal configuration and relying on a responsive customer service team. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense demands more complex deployment but compensates with superior support services, assisting users throughout their setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point SandBlast Network offers competitive pricing and strong ROI due to its ease of use and simple deployment. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense, with potentially higher initial costs, provides significant ROI through its extensive feature set and enhanced threat management capabilities, making it a worthwhile investment for feature-focused users.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 3.3%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 2.1%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network	3.3%
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense	2.1%
Other	94.6%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Karan Pichlangia

Assistant General Manager at Sunteck Realty Pvt Ltd

Advanced threat analysis has reduced malware incidents and gives our security team more confidence

The best features that Check Point SandBlast Network offers include threat emulation for zero-day attacks, which I truly appreciate, and deep file analysis across multiple OS environments. The deep file analysis from Check Point SandBlast Network makes my daily workflow much easier, as I am able to analyze everything in terms of a report about my network. Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization, as I have seen huge changes with a notable drop in malware incidents, especially with suspicious attachments; it gives the security team confidence that known or zero-day files are checked automatically. Regarding the huge drop in malware incidents, I estimate that it may be around 20%.

Read full review

Philippe Panardie

RSSI at SDIS49

Ensuring long-term reliability while seeking internal email management enhancements

Prisma is a commercial name of the firewall now, but we don't work with the cloud product. Only our company is using it and we do not recommend it to customers. For us, it's transparent because it's a cloud product, so we don't really know the version as it's always updated. We have not had any problem, but it's difficult to report on what's going on because some days they can wash out perhaps 100 mails, and then it's difficult to say how many attacks you have reached. The right email has been washed out and then nobody has complained. We do not use the Threat Visualization feature; as we are in MX, the mail is washed out before it is in the mail inbox of the user, thus avoiding any problem requiring a reservation. In fact, there is no integration with existing security frameworks. The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail. I rate Trellix Advanced Threat Defense a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Check Point SandBlast Network is the sandboxing of PDF and Microsoft system files."

"Securing the environment through the sandboxing feature of Check Point SandBlast Network helps my team catch threats before they reach users, and it gives us more confidence in opening files from outside sources, improving our daily workflow."

"It saves time with us trying to do the analysis. We use it to try to find out how something got into the network. We use it to stop something before it ever gets in."

"Nothing is perfect, but Check Point is pretty close to perfect."

"The specific security feature that stands out to me in Check Point SandBlast Network is its real-time protection, which extracts, emulates, and blocks traffic if any malicious signatures are present."

"The solution can detect and prevent attacks that may be encrypted."

"The most efficient and protective characteristics of Check Point's SandBlast solution are that we can see a lot of this protection at the network and mail levels."

"The Check Point SandBlast Network uses caching and static analysis to actually reduce the time it takes to scan and isolate the same file for incoming data compromises."

More Check Point SandBlast Network pros

"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."

"It is very scalable."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

"The fact that in 10 years, we have had no problem is the most valuable feature for us; it's really a washing machine, but the only problem we face is that it's difficult to report on this product."

"I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."

"This solution is very easy to use and requires little to no training."

"It is stable and reliable."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense pros

Cons

"It has some performance overhead, as sandboxing takes time and real-time delivery depends on threat extraction, requiring high performance."

"The initial setup was complex because of the lack of information from the consultant."

"There is a limit on the number of files that can be scanned in real-time, which could lead to us being found with our guard down on a high-traffic day."

"The file types that can be scanned are limited, which means that if the file type is not listed or enabled for the sandbox, they are bypassed and it can lead to a security issue."

"I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it."

"There should be some improvement in the solution's stability and scalability."

"We would like to see this solution reach mobile devices more efficiently, through apps or more specific products."

"Today, we have it as part of a solution or a package. However, we'd like there to be a way where we can have the solution's features available to us in a cheaper way in the future."

More Check Point SandBlast Network cons

"Some of our customers have mentioned the lack of a tool that would allow for remote capabilities without being attached to the internet."

"This solution needs to be made "cloud ready"."

"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

"Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet."

"This product does the job, but it is not flexible enough to do new environments yet."

"The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail."

"The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."

"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."

"The product's cost is high."

"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."

"We have seen ROI."

"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	31
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high, but the setup cost was initially justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?

I feel that Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved with slight delays in cleaning the file delivery. Additionally, I think it requires proper tuning to avoid unnecessary notifications.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My main use case for Check Point SandBlast Network is advanced threat protection, especially for scanning emails, attachments, web downloads, and incoming files through a sandbox environment. A qui...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I would like to see an API interface for internal email and control of outgoing email to make it closer to 10. It's necessary; today we have an MX interface, and it would be interesting to have an ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

We are working with Palo Alto products, specifically firewalls. We are only using Palo Alto Firewalls and not Cortex. With FireEye and Trellix, we only work with ETP now because the NDR function wh...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 21% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 14% of the time

MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 4% of the time

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors

NetWitness Platform vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 8% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Infinity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network

October 2026

Download Check Point SandBlast Network product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

September 2026

Download Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Overview

Check Point SandBlast Network is trusted for advanced threat prevention, employing real-time threat detection and AI-powered analysis to secure corporate environments from zero-day attacks and file-based exploits.

Focused on comprehensive security, SandBlast Network integrates seamlessly with smart security tools to deliver proactive threat prevention. The network leverages sandboxing for zero-day threats, sanitizes email attachments, and frequently updates threat signatures. Threat Emulation and Extraction are key, preventing malicious file downloads and minimizing disruptions while retaining originals for in-depth analysis. Effective at securing emails and web downloads, it offers robust protection against phishing and ransomware.

What are Check Point SandBlast Network's standout features?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Continuously monitors threats as they appear.
Sandboxing: Detects zero-day attacks by emulating files safely.
AI-Powered Analysis: Uses artificial intelligence for deeper threat insights.
Threat Extraction: Delivers clean files while keeping originals for analysis.
Email and Web Scanning: Effective in sanitizing both emails and web downloads.
Phishing and Ransomware Protection: Shields against phishing attempts and ransomware.

What benefits should users expect from using Check Point SandBlast Network?

Comprehensive Security: Ensures thorough protection across infrastructures.
Minimal Disruption: Reduces the impact of malicious files and downloads on operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing security measures and tools.
Maintains Original Files: Keeps original files for further analysis, enhancing threat detection accuracy.

Check Point SandBlast Network is widely implemented in industries needing advanced threat prevention, such as financial, healthcare, and governmental sectors. These industries utilize its robust features to safeguard sensitive data, protect against sophisticated cyber threats, and ensure a secure digital environment for their operations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense offers efficient threat detection and automatic threat remediation, featuring seamless management and integration with operating systems and extensions.

Providing robust malware defense, Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is easy to set up and use. Its components work collaboratively, with standout features like behavioral analysis, retro-inspection, and ePolicy Orchestration. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in Active Directory integration, cloud readiness, artificial intelligence, and faster sandboxing. The API interface and scalability need enhancement, while better compatibility with platforms like Cisco could elevate its function. Effective for server and endpoint security, it effectively blocks threats like WannaCry and disperses attack data through the DXL client quickly.

What are the notable features of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense?

Management and Automatic Threat Remediation: Facilitates seamless management and handling of threats.
Effective Threat Detection and Response: Delivers efficient and reliable threat detection capabilities.
Behavioral Analysis and Retro-Inspection: Offers advanced analysis for comprehensive threat identification.
ePolicy Orchestration: Streamlines processes for enhanced threat management.
Scalability and Price: Provides a stable and scalable solution at a competitive price point.

What key benefits can be identified from reviews?

Ease of Use and Setup: Known for its straightforward implementation and user-friendly interface.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with different operating systems and technologies like Palo Alto firewalls.
Threat Protection Efficiency: Proven effectiveness in stopping threats such as WannaCry.
Rapid Attack Information Dissemination: Utilizes the DXL client for quick data sharing.

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is widely used across numerous industries for server and desktop protection, ensuring endpoint security and halting attacks without failure. Its integration with diverse technologies enhances protection in varied environments, making it a valuable tool in enterprise security management.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media

The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

September 2026

Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.