Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026
Zscaler and Check Point WAF compete in the security solutions category. Check Point WAF seems to have the upper hand due to superior AI-based threat detection, especially in handling complex environments and zero-day attacks.
Features: Zscaler provides seamless zero trust access focusing on remote user connectivity, integrating advanced features like content filtering and granular access control. Check Point WAF offers AI-based threat detection capabilities, effectively protecting against zero-day attacks with its robust AI features and API protections, reducing maintenance efforts and false positives.
Room for Improvement: Zscaler needs to improve its support response times, address network latency issues, and offer clearer pricing. Flexibility in integrating with other products is also desired. Check Point WAF requires enhancements in initial setup guidance, user interface intuitiveness, and expanded language support. High cost and complex configurations are noted as areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zscaler is recognized for its straightforward cloud-based implementation, though it becomes complex in larger environments. Customer support is generally competent but could improve in response times during complex troubleshooting. Check Point WAF is acknowledged for integration in hybrid and multi-cloud environments but requires better support experiences, especially regarding language and setup guidance.
Pricing and ROI: Zscaler is viewed as costly, particularly for large deployments, with a pricing model based on user count and modules. However, it offers a notable ROI by reducing infrastructure and operational costs when transitioning from VPN solutions. Check Point WAF's pricing is high but justified by its security and feature effectiveness, providing substantial ROI through centralized management and comprehensive application security, despite initial cost concerns for SMEs.
