Checkmarx One vs CucumberStudio comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Checkmarx and SmartBear are both solutions in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SmartBear is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.7. Checkmarx holds a 13.9% mindshare in DAST, compared to SmartBear’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

30,538 Views
3,359 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

Read 11 CucumberStudio reviews

2,213 Views
420 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

CucumberStudio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and CucumberStudio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. CucumberStudio Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. CucumberStudio

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (5th), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th), AI Security (3rd)

CucumberStudio

Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 13.9%, down from 20.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CucumberStudio is 1.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	13.9%
CucumberStudio	1.6%
Other	84.5%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Walter Wirch

Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co.

Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"After scanning, it shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are, which helps us to analyze them."

"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."

"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."

"The biggest advantage we have seen is that we're able to develop and deliver secure solutions in a faster time."

"The best features Checkmarx One offers, in my opinion, are that it is easy to use, and there is not much deep diving into this."

"It moved our organization towards being agile vs. waterfall."

"We have been using this product extensively for a lot of applications to identify as well as employ proper remediation which makes the application secure including information issues which might get neglected with a manual code review process."

"It has all the features we need."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"Integration with automation frameworks, keywords, and tags allows for saving time writing test cases and implementing automation."

"Hiptest is a great test management tool for agile teams."

"Hiptest allowed us to clean up our test campaigns and standardize the way we write test cases and structure our BDD approach."

"Using HipTest makes the testing process easy and its support for Behavior Driven Development helps align all the team members, whether technical or non-technical."

"Scenarios, since is a really easy way to create and control your test cases."

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

More CucumberStudio pros

Cons

"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."

"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."

"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."

"The purchase of this solution was a mistake. I would advise others to deploy the solution and to test all of the functionality before buying and do not trust the marketing from Checkmarx."

"Checkmarx isn't accredited by the US government for DOD networks, so we've been forced to remove it from the network."

"The stability of Checkmarx could improve. We're having issues with it, and the scan reliability is sometimes impacted so we sometimes have to restart the services to allow scans out of the queue."

"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"The reporting and metrics can be improved. E.g.: If we wanted to have metrics across all projects."

"Yes, it is not stable when you create a data table that includes more than 30 elements, so it can lose your data."

"Copy-pasting something directly from JIRA requires too much modification and formatting."

"Support with In-App chat is great. However, it would be awesome to have real time support also for PT timezone."

"It needs some improvement when exporting scenarios into automation code, to make it easier to manage the repeatable action words and tests."

More CucumberStudio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

19%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design. The API requires data to be sent in a specific format, which takes time to build. Additionally, the repor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

I use CucumberStudio as a test case repository. All of our test cases are stored there. It is also part of our test planning process. For every sprint, we plan the test cases in CucumberStudio and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hiptest?

For teams following a BDD style software development approach, CucumberStudio is a great collaborative tool that covers all the basic requirements of a test management tool. I would rate CucumberSt...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 22% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Aikido Security vs CucumberStudio

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs CucumberStudio

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Applications vs CucumberStudio

Compared 8% of the time

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) vs CucumberStudio

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs CucumberStudio

Compared 5% of the time

More CucumberStudio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

October 2026

Download CucumberStudio product report

Also Known As

No data available

Hiptest

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

CucumberStudio enhances software testing with BDD-style Gherkin syntax, supporting code integration and data-driven testing, streamlining test management for agile teams.

CucumberStudio facilitates effective test management through robust features, promoting re-usability of action words and seamless third-party collaborations. It integrates smoothly with JIRA and other frameworks, simplifying processes with its intuitive interface. Scenarios and test runs boost testing speed and execution efficiency. However, improvements in JIRA conversion, API integration, and reporting are needed, alongside enhanced support for global users and expanded deployment options. Users find the framework beneficial for tracking user stories with comprehensive test coverage while automating scenarios for mobile and software applications. Planning and documenting tests become seamless as it aligns with project management tools.

What are the standout features?

Re-usability of Action Words: Streamlines test creation by using pre-defined actions across scenarios.
Data Tables: Facilitates efficient data handling for comprehensive testing.
Code Integrations: Ensures seamless connections with existing codebases and APIs.
BDD-Style Gherkin Syntax: Enhances clarity and management of tests.
Unlimited Read-Only Accounts: Allows widespread access for engineers and managers without additional costs.
Integration with JIRA: Links testing processes with project tracking tools for efficient management.
Data-Driven Testing Support: Strengthens the testing process by using varied datasets.

Why consider CucumberStudio for testing?

Enhanced Productivity: User-friendly interface and robust features streamline test management.
Improved Collaboration: Seamless integration with third-party tools promotes teamwork.
Accelerated Testing: Scenarios and test runs enable faster execution and feedback loops.
Cost-Effective Access: Unlimited read-only accounts maximize participation without extra expense.
Comprehensive Coverage: Supports behavior-driven development for thorough testing.

CucumberStudio is widely applied for tracking user stories and ensuring aligned test coverage in industries utilizing BDD frameworks. It facilitates seamless automation of test scenarios within mobile and software development, fostering efficient integration with infrastructure routines, thus supporting comprehensive project management and execution.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. CucumberStudio

September 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. CucumberStudio

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. CucumberStudio and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. CucumberStudio report.

See our list of best Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) vendors.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.