Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] vs Snyk comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Cisco and Snyk solutions aren't in the same category. Snyk is ranked #7 in AS , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Read 9 Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] reviews

87% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 53 Snyk reviews

38,665 Views
10,826 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2025

Cisco CloudCenter EOL and Snyk both have significant roles in cloud and security management. Snyk gains an edge with its advanced security features, justifying its higher costs over Cisco CloudCenter EOL's competitive pricing.

Features: Cisco CloudCenter EOL provides cloud orchestration, resource optimization, and unified management, while Snyk focuses on integrated security solutions, continuous monitoring, and automatic vulnerability resolution.

Room for Improvement: Cisco CloudCenter EOL could enhance its security features, simplify its orchestration tools, and improve integration capabilities. Snyk may need to expand its vulnerability database, lower its costs, and streamline its complex integrations to offer more user-friendly solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco CloudCenter EOL's comprehensive documentation supports cloud deployment, focusing on adaptability in cloud infrastructure. Snyk integrates smoothly into CI/CD pipelines, with robust support for security-specific issues.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco CloudCenter EOL offers competitive pricing with a focus on cloud efficiency. Snyk demands a higher investment but achieves a notable ROI by swiftly identifying and resolving vulnerabilities, thus safeguarding software development.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (18th), Application Security Tools (7th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Container Security (9th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (14th), DevSecOps (4th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (1st), AI Security (9th)

Featured Reviews

Zoom Tong

Director Of Technology at a non-profit with 11-50 employees

Useful features for configuring down to ports but extremely expensive

Our company uses the solution's GUI interface to configure and monitor ports. We look at usage and determine if there are any issues. Cisco is a very qualified company and has been in business for many, many years. The solution is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports. You…

Read full review

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improves security posture by actively reducing critical vulnerabilities and guiding remediation

Snyk's main features include open-source vulnerability scanning, code security, container security, infrastructure as code security, risk-based prioritization, development-first integration, continuous monitoring and alerting, automation, and remediation. The best features I appreciate are the vulnerability checking, vulnerability scanning, and code security capabilities, as Snyk scans all open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and helps with license compliance for open-source components. Snyk integrates into IDEs, allowing issues to be caught as they appear in the code dynamically and prioritizes risk while providing remediation advice. Snyk provides actionable remediation advice on where vulnerabilities can exist and where code security is compromised, automatically scanning everything and providing timely alerts. Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients. Snyk has helped reduce vulnerabilities significantly. Initially, the repository had 17 to 31 critical and high vulnerabilities, but Snyk has helped manage them down to just five vulnerabilities, which are now lower and not high or critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool is really at the center of our whole digital transformation."

"Upgrades are very simple as well because they've allowed us to get updates directly in the CloudCenter Suite manager. If you need to do an upgrade to your setup afterward, you just push a button and it rolls out the parts and retires the old ones. It's seamless and very simple compared to what we've done before."

"Cisco CloudCenter's scalability is good."

"The solution is very, very stable, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it's very reliable."

"You can scale it easily."

"The solution includes a lot of features and is useful because you can configure all the way down to ports."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"Cisco has a lot of published information and documentation that helps users understand the product and its offering very well."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] pros

"From a compliance and visibility reporting perspective, the fact that it can be applicable for multi-cloud environments is very helpful."

"Everything that the product promises it will do, it's been doing that for us."

"Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories, making it suitable for wide-scale deployment."

"The solution is very easy to install, provides clear information that is easy to follow, and we get good feedback regarding code practices and how to fix security issues."

"We use Snyk to check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub."

"There are many valuable features, for example the way the scanning feature works and the integration is cool because I can integrate it and I don't need to wait until the CACD, I can plug it in to our local ID and there I can do the scanning, that is the part I like best."

"I think all the standard features are quite useful when it comes to software component scanning, but I also like the new features they're coming out with, such as container scanning, secrets scanning, and static analysis with SAST."

"Our customers find container scans most valuable. They are always talking about it."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"The improvement I would like to see is not one thing particular to CloudCenter. I'd say it's more of a message that the system is still using a lot of the different products and if they would all just fit better together, they all could be faster together."

"Improvements are needed in UI and multi-tenancy for this solution."

"They should provide an entire cloud offering, from architecture to network security features."

"The tool should improve its security on the XDR part."

"We're moving away from it due to the fact that they discontinued the product and introduced something new that does not fit our purpose."

"You don't get all the solution's benefits if you have older switches."

"I'm not a big fan of CloudCenter. I don't have anything against it, however, the on-premise version has been so hard to upgrade and maintain."

"The solution needs to be more simple."

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] cons

"There are some new features that we would like to see added, e.g., more visibility into library usage for the code. Something along the lines where it's doing the identification of where vulnerabilities are used, etc. This would cause them to stand out in the market as a much different platform."

"It would be great if they can include dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning features."

"All such tools should definitely improve the signatures in their database. Snyk is pretty new to the industry."

"All such tools should definitely improve the signatures in their database. Snyk is pretty new to the industry. They have a pretty good knowledge base, but Veracode is on top because Veracode has been in this business for a pretty long time. They do have a pretty large database of all the findings, and the way that the correlation engine works is superb. Snyk is also pretty good, but it is not as good as Veracode in terms of maintaining a large space of all the historical data of vulnerabilities."

"We were using Microsoft Docker images. It was reporting some vulnerabilities, but we were not able to figure out the fix for them. It was reporting some vulnerabilities in the Docker images given by Microsoft, which were out of our control. That was the only limitation. Otherwise, it was good."

"Then there's the issue of their support. It's not very good, to be honest, and it hasn't been the best experience to deal with them."

"They need to improve the Snyk plugins and make it easier to make your optimizations based on your own needs or features."

"Could include other types of security scanning and statistical analysis"

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is expensive."

"The tool's pricing is balanced with the market."

"The solution is extremely expensive and has additional fees for things like monitoring."

"I would rate the pricing of Snyk at two. I'm currently using the free version, which the company offers before buying the full version. So, the price is affordable, especially for an enterprise."

"Pricing-wise, it is not expensive as compared to other tools. If you have a couple of licenses, you can scan a certain number of projects. It just needs to be attached to them."

"Their licensing model is fairly robust and scalable for our needs. I believe we have reached a reasonable agreement on the licensing to enable hundreds of developers to participate in this product offering. The solution is very tailored towards developers and its licensing model works well for us."

"We do have some missing licenses issues, especially with non-SPDX compliant one, but we expect this to be fixed soon"

"For what Snyk offers, it has the best cost-benefit I have ever seen because you're buying the license per user."

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

"With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Media Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Snyk?

I use Snyk ( /products/snyk-reviews ) in the DevOps pipeline to identify vulnerabilities before deploying the application. It integrates with Jenkins ( /products/jenkins-reviews ).

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

CloudStack vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Scalr vs Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] Competitors

SonarQube vs Snyk

Compared 3% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Snyk

Compared 1% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Snyk

Compared 1% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Snyk

Compared 1% of the time

Datadog vs Snyk

Compared 1% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]

October 2026

Download Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

September 2026

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

CliQr, CliQr CloudCenter

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] is utilized for tenant creation, VM management, hybrid deployment, cloud management, and port configuration.

Primary users include DevOps teams, telecom companies, and service providers. It integrates well with ACI and ASX-T, offering stability, initial setup ease, and extensive documentation. Known for high trust in Latin America, it excels in workflow automation through Action Orchestrator and supports detailed configuration down to ports. However, improvements are required in DevOps alignment, upgrades, automation, and cost management.

What are the most important features of Cisco CloudCenter [EOL]?

Stability: Provides a robust platform with minimal downtime.
Ease of Setup: Simplifies the initial setup process to get users started quickly.
Documentation: Extensive guides and resources available for user support.
Workflow Automation: Action Orchestrator enables cross-infrastructure automation.
Blueprint Pattern: Defines middleware and dependencies effectively.
API Integration: Offers agility and flexibility with API support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

High Trust Level: Recognized reliability, especially in Latin America.
Configuration Support: Capability to configure down to individual ports.
Integration: Seamless integration with ACI and ASX-T.
Agility: Enhanced flexibility and adaptability to changes.

Among its features, Cisco CloudCenter [EOL] serves industries like telecom and service providers needing hybrid deployment and cloud management. DevOps teams utilize it for tenant creation and VM management. Known for stability and initial setup ease, it supports Latin American regions highly. Action Orchestrator aids in workflow automation, benefitting user workflows. Improvements in DevOps alignment, UI, multi-tenancy, YAML abstraction, and cost management are desirable. It requires better security for XDR and comprehensive cloud offerings, including architecture and network security features.

Cisco

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

Sample Customers

NTT, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), CollabNet, Pratt & Miller, PZFlex

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.