Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Arista is ranked #24. Cisco holds a 1.6% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Read 11 Cisco Meraki MR Wireless reviews

1,410 Views
1,410 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

2,196 Views
2,152 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Mojo Networks and Cisco Meraki MR Wireless are competitors in the wireless networking market. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless seems to have an edge due to its advanced features, justifying its higher price for feature-rich deployments.

Features: Mojo Networks provides simple network management, effective security protocols, and ease of use which ensures it automatically configures new access points for seamless network expansion. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers cloud-based management, advanced analytics for network performance, and Layer 7 traffic shaping for bandwidth management, delivering extensive monitoring and configuration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Mojo Networks could enhance its analytics capabilities and cloud management interface. It might also improve scalability to accommodate larger deployments better. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless could streamline its initial cost and expand security features within its base offering. Additionally, simplifying the management interface would benefit non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MR Wireless features a straightforward deployment process supported by centralized cloud management, complemented by strong customer service. Mojo Networks presents easy deployment with highly responsive customer service, offering more personalized support to clients, a point appreciated by many users.

Pricing and ROI: Mojo Networks is priced competitively, attracting cost-conscious buyers with its lower initial setup cost. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, although priced higher, often results in a better ROI for businesses prioritizing in-depth network management solutions due to its comprehensive feature set that promises long-term investment returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is 1.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless	1.6%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	96.9%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Michel Ned

Senior Product Manager at Packet Clouds

Cloud-managed wireless has unified multi-floor offices and has improved application visibility

The central provisioning capability is a major strength, combined with the cloud-based nature of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless. Everything can be done remotely, including deployment, provisioning, and troubleshooting from the cloud. The hardware requirement on-premises is significantly reduced, with only access points needed on-site while the controller sits in the cloud. This represents the major selling point. Many enterprise environments now require application steering and the ability to control traffic through their WAN or SD-WAN, ensuring they can tag applications and enforce policies from a Layer 7 perspective. From the wireless perspective, being able to begin that Layer 7 tracking or Layer 7 enforcement all the way down to the core and to the WAN is valuable. The ability to see through packets at Layer 7 is a good advantage for enterprises that are very security-focused and optimization-focused, making application steering a very important feature. Cloud provisioning is beneficial not only for initial setup but also for troubleshooting and issue resolution. The advantage is that one does not have to deal with the issues of on-premises accessibility, and network issues can be isolated from the cloud. Since Cisco Meraki MR Wireless controller itself is in the cloud, it makes operations easier. The visibility on-premises combined with the ability to control and troubleshoot multiple locations and branch offices from a single pane of glass is very useful. Visibility into the type of traffic passing through at a given point in time is important. If that information can be passed through a SIEM or integrated with a security operations center or incident and event management tool within Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, it provides deeper visibility. The fact that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless can log traffic data for analysis is a very good and frequently used feature.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is mainly used in commercial or business environments and is very suitable for marketing or announcing."

"The most useful feature of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is its cloud-based management."

"Cisco Meraki MR Wireless helps deliver ROI by reducing both deployment and operational costs, while enhancing network availability."

"The central provisioning capability is a major strength, combined with the cloud-based nature of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, because everything can be done remotely, including deployment, provisioning, and troubleshooting from the cloud while only access points are needed on-site, which significantly reduces on-premises hardware requirements and represents the major selling point."

"We benefit from using Cisco Meraki cloud as it makes manageability easier—two people can manage 200 locations efficiently."

"Even though Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is expensive, there are several advantages, and one of the biggest advantages is that the implementation of this device is so easy, which is the main reason why we prefer Cisco devices, even if they are expensive."

"Some of the best features with the wireless solution are that you have a cloud console, so you don't have to create or manage your own instance of a controller."

"The Meraki controller, which is a cloud-based controller, allows us to manage multiple Cisco Meraki MR Wireless APs and monitor their performance, user connectivity, signal, and the AP performance itself."

More Cisco Meraki MR Wireless pros

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."

"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."

"The initial setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."

"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"The challenge with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is that for any Meraki device, you require internet connectivity to get it registered on the cloud."

"The licensing cost should be reduced to make long-term plans more flexible and affordable."

"I think the accuracy of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is almost accurate, but in my opinion, there is a lot of improvisation needed on that side."

"My main concern is that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is overpriced, has limited functionality, and the hardware is not prepared for any further improvements in terms of features."

"Overall, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is a bit pricey; that's the main and probably only disadvantage."

"Some specification parameters of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless are not at the level of competitors like Huawei, and this could be true for many other wireless providers as well."

"Regarding service support, Cisco Meraki does not provide direct support. When raising incidents or support tickets, the support is not always effective."

"However, the access point configuration differs in that it is not divided into options for embedded wireless controller or centralized wireless controller management."

More Cisco Meraki MR Wireless cons

"The setup was complex."

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."

"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

"The user interface needs improvement to make navigation even more simplistic."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"Of every solution we looked at, every wireless solution, Mojo was a minimum of six figures cheaper. Minimum. Most of them were double, which again is unheard of. Not only do you get all the feature benefits, like everything is there, everything just works, but at the same time, it was a no-brainer, because of the cost. It's almost like you hit the lottery."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"The license is provided per access point, so you buy an access point and you use it."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Regarding the pricing aspect, I think the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless are very reasonable and good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Regarding improvements or enhancements in Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, I believe Cisco should take the step of offering multi-vendor support. I have worked with solutions where the same access point c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is mainly used in commercial or business environments and is very suitable for marketing or announcing. Easy deployment is one of its key advantages, requiring only the ins...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Compared 16% of the time

Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Wireless 9100 Access Points vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Compared 11% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

October 2026

Download Cisco Meraki MR Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

October 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers a robust wireless connectivity solution designed for scalability and ease of deployment, making it suitable for modern enterprises seeking reliable network performance.

With its cloud-managed structure, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless provides comprehensive visibility and control over wireless environments, catering to diverse locations and user counts. Its seamless integration simplifies network management, crucial for data-driven decisions in enterprises. The system's configuration and maintenance are streamlined via the intuitive dashboard, ensuring users can optimize performance with minimal effort.

What are the important features of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Cloud Management: Access and control your wireless network from anywhere, providing flexibility and ease of administration.
Seamless Scaling: Effortlessly expand the network as the organization grows without disruption.
Advanced Security: Integrated security features protect against threats and ensure data integrity.
Powerful Analytics: Gain insights into network usage to make informed decisions and optimize performance.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced operational costs due to simplified management and deployment tools.
Time Savings: Quick setup and easy maintenance lead to significant time savings for IT teams.
Improved Performance: Enhanced network reliability and speed increase productivity and satisfaction.
Scalability: Adaptable solution that supports business growth without needing significant manual intervention.

Healthcare facilities, educational institutions, and retail environments favor Cisco Meraki MR Wireless for its robust security and ease of management in environments demanding reliable connectivity. Its ability to handle high-density environments with minimal latency makes it an asset in education. Retail chains utilize comprehensive analytics to optimize in-store experiences and operations.

Cisco

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.