Cisco Meraki MX vs Stormshield Network Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Stormshield are both solutions in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6, while Stormshield is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 8.2% mindshare in UTMU, compared to Stormshield’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Stormshield users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki MX

Read 81 Cisco Meraki MX reviews

14,550 Views
4,656 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Stormshield Network Security

Read 18 Stormshield Network Security reviews

4,227 Views
1,860 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki MX

Stormshield Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Stormshield Network Security and Cisco Meraki MX compete in the network security space, each with distinct advantages. Cisco Meraki MX seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and cloud management capabilities, appealing to those in need of a flexible security solution.

Features: Stormshield Network Security provides comprehensive threat protection through features like the Stormshield Analyzer, object group-based firewalling, and robust security integration. Meraki MX offers a cloud management platform, auto VPN capabilities for remote workers, and advanced security features like threat detection and traffic shaping.

Room for Improvement: Stormshield could benefit from a more intuitive user interface, enhanced scalability, and improved cloud integration. Meraki MX might improve by offering more budget-friendly pricing, expanding firmware support, and enhancing customization options for specific enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MX is favored for its ease of deployment and cloud-based management, making it simple for IT teams to deploy remotely. Stormshield may have a steeper learning curve, but it compensates with robust customer support, ensuring help is readily available for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Stormshield Network Security is often more budget-friendly, appealing to those with immediate budget constraints. Cisco Meraki MX, while more expensive initially, is seen as providing substantial ROI through sophisticated features and scalability, making it an attractive long-term investment for businesses looking to integrate cloud management with security.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki MX

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (9th)

Stormshield Network Security

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki MX is 8.2%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stormshield Network Security is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Threat Management (UTM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki MX	8.2%
Stormshield Network Security	3.8%
Other	88.0%

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

Featured Reviews

Md Rafique

Desktop support Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized security management has simplified daily monitoring and remote troubleshooting

One area that could be improved is providing more advanced reporting and analytics within the dashboard, especially more detailed historical data and customizable reports. It would also be useful to have greater flexibility for advanced firewall and security configuration without making the interface more complex. Better customization and more detailed troubleshooting information would also help administrators. Another improvement would be more granular control over alerts and notifications, so administrators can prioritize critical security and network events without being overwhelmed by less important alerts. More detailed historical analysis and easier integration with third-party security and monitoring tools would also be valuable. Overall, I would keep the simplicity of the Meraki dashboard while adding more advanced options for administrators who need deeper control and visibility. One additional improvement would be better support for integration with third-party security and monitoring platforms. More flexible APIs, deeper SIEM integration, and more detailed security analytics would make Cisco Meraki MX even more useful for organizations with a broader security stack, while the simplicity and centralized management are already strong points.

Read full review

Zsolt Jónás

System Administrator at NaxoNet

Advanced GUI and layered security have supported compliance and simplified intrusion prevention

I haven't had a task that I couldn't solve with Stormshield Network Security. The active-active high availability solution would be beneficial because currently, if you build a high availability solution with Stormshield Network Security, you have a main device and another one is a backup device. The HA can switch between them, but it would be good to have a master-master solution, not just a master-slave one. I could set a URL that I can call to update the DNS record. Currently, Stormshield Network Security devices support DynDNS, which is not a usual feature request from a server environment. I have my own solution instead of DynDNS because I don't prefer it, so I have my own service for that. However, the GUI does not support using a custom service instead of DynDNS. I had to solve it in the console on Stormshield Network Security device, but it would be much better if it was reachable on the GUI. I had to figure out a trick for the IPsec configuration. In the IPsec config, we have to provide the remote side's IP address, but it's always changing. This means that an office, for example a company that has an office but without a fixed IP address, cannot be used with IPsec VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've been in this industry for 40 years and this is the simplest and easiest product that I've ever used."

"Its ease of configuration and management is very useful for us and for other companies that don't have an onsite IT person. It is easy to configure and easy to manage. It is easy to configure the VPN with the Auto VPN feature."

"It has a helpful feature for database troubleshooting issues."

"The most valuable feature is that we didn't have any problems with Meraki MX."

"Meraki is very easy to configure, so if you want an easy to configure firewall, I think Meraki is a good solution for you."

"The features we have found most valuable are the firewall and the monitoring tools."

"The dashboard is very intuitive and easy to understand."

"Managed centrally over the web: You can manages all your Meraki devices in a single account."

More Cisco Meraki MX pros

"The features I find most valuable is the backup inspection, the filtering, and the load balancing, and I am also impressed by the antivirus feature that gives us two controls over the viruses - one is from the parameter and one on the endpoint."

"A very robust product."

"I like that it works fine. Stormshield is a very good solution."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the URL filtering database, which is great and contains all internet categories, the highly scalable interface that I can turn into what I want including hybrid, bridge, or router mode, the security with no back doors that is more secure than other solutions, and the hardware performance that is also better than others."

"I like how you can configure the rules. There is the task for the rules and a task for the network configuration. It also provides SMD filtering, and it can be integrated with the active directory for the users, their mission, and the VPN configuration. We are here in Sudan, and Stormshield didn't work in Sudan for more than a decade. Stormshield is a very strong firewall and very easy to configure and maintain. I am just working with the firewall solution, and we don't have any other solutions like endpoint solutions or something like that."

"Fortinet, Dell SonicWall and Check Point because these products offer a wide range of features that are not available with Netasq."

"This product has improved the way our organization functions."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its dashboard, which helps you manage different aspects of a single page."

More Stormshield Network Security pros

Cons

"It would be great if the Meraki devices let us see, in real time, the internet demand on a single device."

"They need to improve the user interface because it is a little clumsy."

"The security is not as strong as it could be"

"The product is quite complex to set up."

"From a subscription base or price perspective, there's some room for improvement. They also need more security features."

"More detail is needed for configuration of the VPN."

"My experience with the price, implementation cost, and licenses of Cisco Meraki MX is that it could be a bit cheaper; it is not a cheap product."

"We face a lot of challenges with hybrid and distributed enterprise networks across the US and Canada."

More Cisco Meraki MX cons

"Support is always an issue because they're constantly busy."

"It could be better if it were more user-friendly. It's too complicated for us to use it. The price could be better as well."

"The pricing of this solution needs to be decreased."

"An application firewall like other next generation firewalls have."

"The main area of this product that has room for improvement is pricing. Stormshield Network Security is quite expensive."

"The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive."

"The product must improve its pricing."

"The biggest issue was their support department was not able to help us, then everything stops. This is a no-go area for me."

More Stormshield Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Meraki MX is an expensive solution."

"We just have to pay for the product and the license. We have a license for three years, and it is renewed every three years. It costs $1,200 for three years for one endpoint. Meraki had a good promotion for remote workers or remote workforce. The discount is very good. This promotion continues till the next fiscal year of Cisco."

"Like any Cisco product, the license is really expensive for small business clients. It needs to be cheaper. If you look it up, you might go, "That doesn't make any sense.""

"It is a good global solution in terms of the price and features, but because we sell this solution in dollars, sometimes we don't get to sell this solution in Brazil because the dollar is very expensive. The price of every project is different. It varies depending upon the project, scenario, and client."

"I think the price is comparable with other solutions of the same kind. Depending on the use case it could be cheaper or more expensive, I think it offers good value."

"The larger MX products are on the expensive side."

"The solution is expensive compared to other vendors but you can get good discounts if you know the account manager. The product is less expensive than a normal Cisco subscription. The tool's hardware warranty is a lifetime but you need to purchase support which comes in three, five, and seven years subscriptions."

"The product is a little expensive."

More Cisco Meraki MX pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution and the price of support are ok."

"We chose Stormshield for its price, as the Azure firewall was too expensive."

"The SN200 series costs between $500 USD and $600 USD per year, whereas the SN700 series costs approximately $1,000 annually."

"The pricing could be better."

"We bought a three-year license, and we renew it whenever it expires. The price could be better. It's always very expensive."

"For mid-sized companies, they sell their appliances for good prices."

"I think the price is good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	48
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Fortigate 60d vs. Meraki MX67 for a small company without a dedicated IT Department

We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL Inspection, Granular Firewall rules (Block only, no allow setting), client vpn re...

See all answers

Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki MX?

I find the pricing for Cisco Meraki MX reasonable and competitive given the features provided and the target market. I believe it is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Stormshield Network Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Stormshield Network Security?

I already use Stormshield Network Security, and I am now looking for a new solution. I am already working with Stormshield Network Security, and the official reseller of Stormshield.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Stormshield Network Security?

The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive. Palo Alto and others are much more expensive, but Stormshield Network Security is also not inexpensive. My overall review rating fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 32% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 5% of the time

SonicWall NSa vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki MX Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 15% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 11% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 8% of the time

OPNsense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 5% of the time

KerioControl vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 2% of the time

More Stormshield Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX

October 2026

Download Cisco Meraki MX product report

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Network Security

September 2026

Download Stormshield Network Security product report

Also Known As

MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600

NETASQ Firewalls

Overview

Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud-managed security with user-friendly setup and efficient management, enhancing VPN and firewall functionalities for businesses.

Cisco Meraki MX is known for its robust cloud-based network management, featuring AutoVPN, SD-WAN, and advanced security. Its centralized control over firewall, traffic shaping, and monitoring ensures excellent connectivity and security. The interface allows easy management by non-technical staff, offering remote access and seamless network performance through real-time alerts and troubleshooting. It supports global connectivity with minimal effort, addressing needs across small to enterprise environments. Despite its strengths, users point out areas needing improvement like load balancing, VPN features, more flexible logging, and session capabilities. Pricing, integration limits, and licensing need enhancement.

What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?

AutoVPN: Enables automatic VPN configuration for secure, site-to-site connections.
SD-WAN: Optimizes traffic routes for increased performance and reliability.
Advanced Security: Offers unified threat management, intrusion prevention, and content filtering.
Centralized Management: Simplifies operations with remote monitoring and configuration.
Traffic Shaping: Prioritizes critical business applications to maximize performance.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Deployment: Simplified installation reduces setup time and cost.
Real-Time Alerts: Ensures proactive issue identification and resolution.
Scalability: Supports growth with seamless integration and management of multiple sites.
Global Connectivity: Maintains efficient connections across geographic locations with minimal effort.

In industries like retail, finance, and education, Cisco Meraki MX provides enhanced security and connectivity. Retail chains benefit from easy VPN setups for secure multi-site networking, while educational institutions find value in its ability to manage large campuses efficiently. Financial services leverage its robust security features to protect sensitive data, ensuring compliance and trust.

Cisco

Stormshield Network Security offers comprehensive protection with features like backup inspection, scalable interface, and load balancing, suitable for network security management.

Stormshield Network Security is designed for organizations requiring reliable IT infrastructure protection, providing firewall capabilities, intrusion detection, and application control. Users find VPN support, URL filtering, and UTM functions beneficial for network management. Models like SN200 and SN910 are used globally in clustered configurations, addressing different demands. Challenges include pricing, interface friendliness, filtering configurations, and technical support.

What are the key features of Stormshield Network Security?

Backup Inspection: Enhances reliability and recovery options.
Antivirus Controls: Provides robust virus protection.
Intrusion Detection: Alerts on potential threats.
Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic efficiently.
URL Filtering: Blocks malicious websites for safe browsing.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Scalability: Adapts to each organization's growing needs.
Reliability: Supports clustered configurations for uptime.
Management Ease: Intuitive dashboard aids network oversight.
Performance: High throughput with efficient clustering.

Stormshield Network Security is widely implemented in industries needing IT infrastructure protection, like finance or healthcare. Organizations deploy it in data centers or branch offices, benefiting from features ensuring safety and performance. The tool supports environments that demand high security levels and robust network monitoring.

Stormshield

Sample Customers

Hyatt, ONS

ACESUR group, Ministry of Education Oman, Anios Laboratories, Zain, DLM Location

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

October 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security report.

See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors and best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.