Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Cisco and Motorola solutions aren't in the same category. Cisco is ranked #5 in Wireless LAN , with an average rating of 8.8, and holds a 10.2% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Motorola users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 123 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

14,771 Views
13,294 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]

Read 1 Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN.

To learn more, read our detailed Wireless LAN Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Wireless LAN

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.7

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

Wireless LAN (5th)

Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2847906

Senior Network at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Wireless management has become efficient with rich client visibility for troubleshooting

In terms of specific challenges with hybrid environments, I face no issues. I assess the operational efficiency of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in my IT environment as pretty efficient for the most part. I would rate it at approximately 80%. I have had some issues with the dashboard itself and as far as switch management goes, but that is not necessarily on the wireless side of things. The wireless side has been quite good. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN optimizes the experience in a hybrid or distributed enterprise setup. My impression of the end-to-end visibility offered by Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is quite good. I function as an admin. What stood out to make me choose Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that I already leverage many products with Cisco. I have Catalyst switching, ACI infrastructure, and use them for my core and edge routers. I would give this review an overall rating of 8 out of 10.

Read full review

it_user375078

Senior Network Engineer/Mobility Specialist at CCSI - Contemporary Computer Services, Inc.

Great for hospitals as the main hospital is usually the hub of many smaller buildings and also the tallest building in the neighborhood.

Motorola has solid RF experience for longer than any other vendor These are great for hospitals as the main hospital is usually the hub of many smaller buildings and also the tallest building in the neighborhood. This is an ideal scenario for P2P or PTMP wireless. The documentation is lacking…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The network security the solution provides is its most valuable aspect."

"We can deploy it and check in on our customers without having an on-site connection or an on-site infrastructure for elderly customers."

"I would recommend this solution to others because it's reliable, stable, and easy to implement."

"From a security perspective, this product has several advantages."

"The settings of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN can be very granular. You can lock down and block devices with the controls. For example, we have four different wireless settings, such as guest, employee, security, and backup. For example, the settings for the employees, if they use laptops, they're required to have certain settings, such as an antivirus installed. If they do not then Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN will not let them connect. This is very good protection because the network works on the bringing your own device(BYOD) principle. It's a BYOD environment now, and you also don't want them to bring infection into the environment because these people are connecting to the LAN via wireless connections. We have to be careful because we're managing it, we have to be very strict with regards to the rules and policies."

"The product is super stable. I would rate the stability a ten."

"It is straightforward and very easy, basically plug-and-play, and it is very quick, probably taking more time to actually do the physical installation."

"I haven't had many problems, and in the many times I've worked with the kit, it's never failed me."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The reliability has to do with how often an RF link will go down, and this almost never happens in my experience with Motorola outdoor wireless."

Cons

"Some of their first level support staff does not seem to be well-versed in the solution, so support for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN needs improvement."

"The dashboard could be a bit better. I'd like to see more information about the whole controller and APs. It should be as simple and convenient."

"They could also add some more controls for guest access. For example, when you have a captive portal, it would be nice to limit the amount of time users can stay connected per day. Right now, you can only configure the splash frequency. And you can set the connection for one hour, but you have to use the billing feature."

"However, the security could improve."

"The solution's mobile application and management of dashboards are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

"The cost of the devices and the solution itself could be more competitive."

"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed."

"The product doesn't effectively do its job anymore since some issues crop up in it once you run out of your subscription licensing...Improvements are needed in the licensing part of the tool."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"The documentation is lacking and they need to work on it. Motorola seems to have less documentation than competitors and less of it readily available online."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive, but it is a good product."

"My client has made comments on the price, indicating it is expensive, however you do receive a lot for the money that you did spend on the solution. The price of the annual renewal of the licensing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a little high. We wish the price would drop."

"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

"It is super expensive for what you get. You also have to buy a license every year. Otherwise, it stops working."

"The price of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is per unit and it has annual maintenance costs."

"The platform is more expensive than other solutions."

"It could be more affordable than other solutions."

"The cost of both the hardware and licensing is high, and it is more than what I would prefer to spend currently."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	69
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	33

No data available

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have ...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 36% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 16% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL]

Compared 45% of the time

More Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

November 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Wireless WAN

October 2026

Download Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

No data available

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?

Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco

Information not available

Motorola

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Western United States County Water Department

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.