Claris FileMaker vs InfluxDB comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apple and InfluxData are both solutions in the Non-Relational Databases category. Apple is ranked #3, while InfluxData is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Apple holds a 6.3% mindshare in NRD, compared to InfluxData’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Apple users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

Claris FileMaker

Read 5 Claris FileMaker reviews

958 Views
948 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

8,219 Views
575 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Claris FileMaker

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Claris FileMaker and InfluxDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Non-Relational Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Claris FileMaker vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Claris FileMaker vs. InfluxDB

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Claris FileMaker

Ranking in Non-Relational Databases

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

InfluxDB

Ranking in Non-Relational Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th), Network Monitoring Software (15th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (12th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of Claris FileMaker is 6.3%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 6.6%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Non-Relational Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	6.6%
Claris FileMaker	6.3%
Other	87.1%

Non-Relational Databases

Featured Reviews

it_user1540227

Computer Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities

They're always improving it, and I have been quite pleased with their improvements. There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently. They should make a structure so that you can have the data in one file and the app, the scripts, and the program in another file. I would like to be able to easily share scripts between different databases. I write stuff, and some of the functions are shared across different databases. So, I have to copy them from one database to another. I wouldn't mind an infrastructure where I had a file, and on loading the program, this file is loaded with the functions that I had written. I can then call them from any database that I happen to be using. Currently, you have a database open that has all of its data pieces and program pieces, and then you open another database that has got all of its data pieces and program pieces. Nothing is shared between them. When I write a complex function and I want to use it in two or three different databases, I have to copy it to each one of them and also remember where all it is used. It would be good if it has a little bit different organizational structure so that you could put your shared stuff in one place, and it loads the stuff. It is just an architectural difference. I've sent this requirement to them, but I doubt if that's going to happen. It is a huge system, and making changes for a single individual doesn't happen that quickly.

Read full review

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found its resilience to attack most valuable; it's really difficult to attack the software and it's really stable as well."

"The database is the most useful aspect of the solution; it's a good application that's easy to use."

"The cross-platform Mac and Windows feature is most valuable. I can do all sorts of stuff with this tool. It has got all sorts of automation capabilities. I have used some of them, but I have barely scratched the surface of what it can do on automation. It is user-friendly, and it integrates well with other products. There are other third-party options that you can buy or in some cases, download for free to even extend it further. I use one or two of those."

"FileMaker is much easier, it's a pretty good tool and there's a lot of support and there's a lot of people out there that know how to use it."

"It is a great starter to commence with in the world of database management, even if you have limited development knowledge and is a sure bet for professional and long term expansion."

"I love this product; I have been using it for 30 years, and it has got lots of capabilities, so don't sell it short because it can do a lot more than you might think it can."

"InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project."

"The solution is very powerful."

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

"My advice for others looking into using InfluxDB is to use it the same way I did, because it is really stable, easy and friendly to use, and it is a great product overall."

"Overall, InfluxDB delivered excellent performance, stability, and simplicity for telemetry-driven use cases."

"InfluxDB has played a key role in enhancing system reliability and supporting our goal of delivering a seamless, high-quality product."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"Prior to InfluxDB usage, real-time data was not visualized and monitored, and after the introduction of InfluxDB in the entire framework, the organization is benefiting a lot in terms of monitoring and understanding performance data in real-time."

More InfluxDB pros

Cons

"There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently."

"It has some limits in terms of scalability. FileMaker is good for small and medium-sized companies. When data grows, in the case of a bigger corporation, it will be difficult to scale it."

"FileMaker has some convoluted pricing."

"They're always improving it, and I have been quite pleased with their improvements. There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently. They should make a structure so that you can have the data in one file and the app, the scripts, and the program in another file. I would like to be able to easily share scripts between different databases. I write stuff, and some of the functions are shared across different databases. So, I have to copy them from one database to another. I wouldn't mind an infrastructure where I had a file, and on loading the program, this file is loaded with the functions that I had written. I can then call them from any database that I happen to be using. Currently, you have a database open that has all of its data pieces and program pieces, and then you open another database that has got all of its data pieces and program pieces. Nothing is shared between them. When I write a complex function and I want to use it in two or three different databases, I have to copy it to each one of them and also remember where all it is used. It would be good if it has a little bit different organizational structure so that you could put your shared stuff in one place, and it loads the stuff. It is just an architectural difference. I've sent this requirement to them, but I doubt if that's going to happen. It is a huge system, and making changes for a single individual doesn't happen that quickly."

"Customer Service: We work from Asia and support is particular poor."

"Multimedia data management is not really developed in FileMaker."

"The UE is not very up-to-date. It looks like something that was created in the 90s. In that sense, the user experience is lacking."

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

"However, I do wish the documentation and community resources around Flux were more extensive and beginner-friendly."

"Customer support is fair enough but can be improved."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

"Sometimes, when we write too much data within a minute, the data count becomes excessive, reaching perhaps 100,000 or 500,000 data points, and InfluxDB gives a timeout exception, which we must handle in our application."

More InfluxDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is pretty reasonable. I am at a university. We get educational discount pricing from most of the major vendors."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 21% of the time

Oracle Berkeley DB vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon SimpleDB vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 17% of the time

Aurea Sonic XML Server vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 14% of the time

ENEA Polyhedra vs Claris FileMaker

Compared 7% of the time

More Claris FileMaker Competitors

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Claris FileMaker

October 2026

Download Claris FileMaker product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

October 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Overview

Claris FileMaker is a versatile platform designed for creating custom applications that integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Known for its adaptability, it enables users to develop tailored solutions efficiently, addressing varied business processes.

FileMaker offers a robust suite of tools for professional developers and non-technical users alike, allowing quick application creation and deployment. It supports cross-platform access, making it an excellent choice for businesses needing flexible solutions without deep technical involvement. Its intuitive design supports automation, extensive integration capabilities, and secure data management to enhance business workflows comprehensively.

What key features does Claris FileMaker offer?

Cross-platform Access: Ensure applications work seamlessly on Windows, Mac, iOS, and web browsers.
Integration APIs: Connect with other apps effortlessly through RESTful APIs.
Data Management: Store and manage data efficiently with built-in security measures.
Customizable Templates: Start projects faster with pre-designed templates that can be modified.
Automation Tools: Automate routine tasks to increase efficiency.

What benefits should users look for in Claris FileMaker?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamline operations by automating and customizing workflows.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduce the need for multiple tools by consolidating tasks in one platform.
Scalability: Adapt solutions as business requirements grow or change.
User Empowerment: Enable both developers and end-users to contribute to application building without extensive coding knowledge.

Industries like retail, healthcare, and education leverage Claris FileMaker for tailored applications and workflow automation, addressing specific workplace challenges such as inventory management, patient data handling, and educational resource distribution. Its customizable nature allows these sectors to optimize their operations effectively.

Apple

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Sample Customers

VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

Claris FileMaker vs. InfluxDB

September 2026

Free Report: Claris FileMaker vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about Claris FileMaker vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Claris FileMaker vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.