No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Claris FileMaker vs Kurrent comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Claris FileMaker
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kurrent
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
20th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of Claris FileMaker is 6.3%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kurrent is 2.2%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Non-Relational Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Claris FileMaker6.3%
Kurrent2.2%
Other91.5%
Non-Relational Databases
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1540227 - PeerSpot reviewer
Computer Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees
User-friendly, very stable, reasonable price, integrates well, and has all sorts of capabilities
They're always improving it, and I have been quite pleased with their improvements. There is some organizational stuff that I'd like to see done differently. They should make a structure so that you can have the data in one file and the app, the scripts, and the program in another file. I would like to be able to easily share scripts between different databases. I write stuff, and some of the functions are shared across different databases. So, I have to copy them from one database to another. I wouldn't mind an infrastructure where I had a file, and on loading the program, this file is loaded with the functions that I had written. I can then call them from any database that I happen to be using. Currently, you have a database open that has all of its data pieces and program pieces, and then you open another database that has got all of its data pieces and program pieces. Nothing is shared between them. When I write a complex function and I want to use it in two or three different databases, I have to copy it to each one of them and also remember where all it is used. It would be good if it has a little bit different organizational structure so that you could put your shared stuff in one place, and it loads the stuff. It is just an architectural difference. I've sent this requirement to them, but I doubt if that's going to happen. It is a huge system, and making changes for a single individual doesn't happen that quickly.
Use Kurrent?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
16%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
11%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

VUHL, Reynolds Services Inc., Market Refrigeration Specialists, Sea Breeze Farm, Jordan Lindblad, Henry Schein Dental
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxData, Oracle, Apple and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.