Cloud Foundry vs Google Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cloud Foundry and Google are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Cloud Foundry is ranked #19, while Google is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7. Cloud Foundry holds a 1.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Google’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of Cloud Foundry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Google users who would recommend it.

Cloud Foundry

Read 2 Cloud Foundry reviews

1,908 Views
1,832 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

Read 81 Google Cloud reviews

17,973 Views
8,268 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cloud Foundry

Google Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Cloud Foundry and Google Cloud are competitive offerings in the cloud platform market. Google Cloud holds an upper hand due to its advanced features and comprehensive service offerings, even at a higher price point.

Features: Cloud Foundry provides platform-as-a-service capabilities with strong support for multi-cloud environments, offering developers flexibility and simplified app deployment. Google Cloud stands out with its wide range of integrated services, particularly in AI and machine learning, providing technological advantages beyond traditional PaaS.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloud Foundry is designed for quick deployment times and streamlined onboarding processes, while its customer service is known for direct and effective communication. Google Cloud offers a robust deployment framework with extensive automation tools, although it can present a steeper learning curve. Its customer service includes nuanced support options for complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: Cloud Foundry is recognized for its cost-effectiveness, offering scalable solutions without significant upfront investment and favorable ROI due to lower operational management costs. Google Cloud’s pricing is higher but delivers significant ROI through advanced capabilities and scalability, targeting rapidly scaling enterprises with comprehensive solutions aligned with long-term growth strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Foundry vs. Google Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Foundry vs. Google Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Foundry

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

19th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Cloud Foundry is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud is 5.8%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud	5.8%
Cloud Foundry	1.9%
Other	92.3%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Carlos Bittrich

Technology Advisor at Fabrik

Quick to deploy but being deprecated by IBM and should be merged with Kubernetes

We enjoy the fast deployment. Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the developer or administrator. The autoscaling is great. It is just a switch that needs to be turned on, and autoscaling starts working. At this moment, you begin to see different meters about usage that helps you in updating the scaling limits, which help you tune the running instances. Besides this, autoscaling can be scheduled, so in times of low activity, you can have lower limits or increase in advance for special dates. It has good logging. CF has logging events that help identify when a transaction runs and its response time which helps in monitoring execution.

Read full review

AnjaneyaVara Prasad

Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM is the only vendor to offer integration with blockchain for smart contract development."

"Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the user."

"My favorite component of IBM's solution is Node-RED, which greatly shortens the amount of time required to develop, test, and deploy new applications."

"By moving to IBM Cloud Foundry, we reduced our project time by a factor of two and decreased costs by a factor of four because it was a PoC."

"The solution works well for BigQuery and big data analysis support such as column alerts and tabular databases."

"Google Meet is simple to use regarding configuration and recording sessions."

"It's a perfect tool for startups."

"The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable."

"The solution's features are very good and our staff loves using them."

"I like it because it's convenient, Google Cloud is also stable and scalable, and the technical support is good as well."

"Google is fantastic and I think that people should go for it."

"Google Cloud can be used to share files with no need to carry them with you since it is on the cloud, and you can access it anywhere if you are traveling or if you have important documents."

More Google Cloud pros

Cons

"After the initial excitement period with Node-RED is over, you crave the need of additional integrations to third-party services."

"In IBM Cloud, the product has been deprecated in favor of Kubernetes, which is a more complicated infrastructure to manage."

"They need to improve the costing for predictive analytics, which is mainly related to the tools that come with AI. They also need to improve the BigQuery cost optimization and the visualization."

"The ease-of-use could be improved for less technical users."

"The solution has okay stability, however, that said, it has a way to go before it keeps up to something like Azure."

"Currently, in my region, they don't offer many services as they have just started. They need to wait on that."

"It could have a reporting tool included."

"Google Cloud does not have many build pipelines like Azure does."

"I have not seen any specific measurable benefits in terms of time-saving or manpower saving."

"The product could be improved by expanding the initial storage space available."

More Google Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing models should be reworked to the needs of a wider range of companies. Some customers will not be able to afford it until quite a few years into production, even after good PoC results and a successful launch."

"You are allocated a minimum amount of resources in the free tier. This seems fair and highly scalable, as you pay per usage as per cloud pricing schemes."

"IBM has a free tier and payment option depending on the products selected."

"The licensing for Google Cloud seems to be quite cheap and they're actually quite reasonable in comparison to Azure, which, as it turns out, is quite expensive. Even though Azure has a data center in South Africa it's still quite costly. There's no scaling, so if you go with the VM, you pay 2500 Rand. When you add another VM, it's another 2500 Rand even though you don't use the whole thing. With Google, you can go up as incrementally as you need to, even if it's just 30 Rand."

"I am not familiar with the pricing, but I would guess that it is probably cheaper than Microsoft Suite"

"They provide user-based licensing plans. Its plan could be less expensive."

"It's not really an expensive solution, but it would be better if there were more flexibility in the pricing model."

"For commercial purposes, users need to pay for the products they use on a workload basis, not a license basis. There are two pricing models: fixed monthly and pay-as-you-go. In the pay-as-you-go model, users pay for the resources they use, while in the fixed monthly model, they have 24/7 access to resources for a set monthly fee."

"The solution is cheaper than AWS."

"Compared to Azure Cloud, Google Cloud is more expensive but it is okay."

"Google Cloud should be divided into modules so that users can buy which module will satisfy them. The overall price of Google Cloud should be reduced, Microsoft is a little bit cheaper. However, if Google divided the cloud offering it would be better. For example, if someone wants to use only for OneDrive they should be able to purchase the service separately, it would reduce the price. There is a license required to use this solution for enterprises. There is a free account, which the users can increase the size of the space. Google cloud is used in most Android Mobile device operating systems."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

I think perhaps the usability of Google Cloud could be one of the things that might get improved. In terms of not having to type the whole instruction I need to input to the system, just maybe some...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

My main use case for Google Cloud would be using the functions and the Vertex AI functionality, so mostly AI research and AI deployment. For my AI research and deployment, I use Vertex AI to extrac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?

On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Google Cloud a nine. I choose nine because it combines a unique set of tools that are actually helpful and impactful on my daily work. Regarding Google Cloud's AI capa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 15% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 8% of the time

Google App Engine vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 6% of the time

More Cloud Foundry Competitors

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

October 2026

Download Cloud Foundry product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

October 2026

Download Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

GCP

Overview

Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that simplifies application deployment and management across various clouds. It enables developers to focus on coding by automating the underlying infrastructure management.

Cloud Foundry offers a robust environment where developers can build, test, deploy, and scale applications efficiently. It removes the complexity of setting up infrastructure, providing a consistent development experience across different platforms. It supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, which makes it versatile for developers working in diverse environments. The platform's container-based architecture helps ensure that applications can scale seamlessly while maintaining performance and reliability.

What are the standout features of Cloud Foundry?

Multi-Cloud Compatibility: Supports deployment across major cloud providers ensuring flexibility and choice.
Continuous Delivery: Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines to facilitate automated testing and deployment.
Built-in Logging and Monitoring: Offers tools for thorough monitoring and logging, ensuring application health.
Scalability: Provides easy scaling of applications to manage fluctuating workloads.
Container-Based Architecture: Utilizes containers to ensure consistent deployment and performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Savings achieved through decreased infrastructure management costs.
Developer Productivity: Enables faster development cycles due to streamlined processes.
Operational Transparency: Enhanced monitoring and logging features that provide clear insights.
Flexibility to Innovate: Ability to quickly deploy and test new ideas without infrastructure concerns.
Robust Ecosystem Support: Peer and vendor support to enhance application development processes.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, Cloud Foundry is implemented to enhance agile development practices. Financial institutions use it for rapid prototyping, allowing them to respond swiftly to market changes. Healthcare providers leverage its security features to maintain data privacy while deploying applications. Retail businesses benefit from its scalability to manage peak shopping periods effortlessly.

Cloud Foundry

Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.

Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.

What are the essential features of Google Cloud?

Cost-effectiveness: Enables budget-friendly operations and reduced operational costs.
Easy Setup: Offers a straightforward and quick setup process.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs with vast resources and infrastructure.
Robust Security: Provides strong protection and compliance measures.
Seamless Integration: Effective integration with tools like Kubernetes and other applications.

What benefits and ROI can be observed?

Reduction in Operational Costs: Minimizes infrastructure and maintenance expenses.
Global Reach: Allows businesses to expand operations across multiple regions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business models and rapid scaling needs.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitates integration with existing tools and platforms.

Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.

Google

Sample Customers

Grape Up, c-Com, KONE, TITAN, CSAA, Bosch, Allstate, Verizon, West Corp., Telstra

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Foundry vs. Google Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: Cloud Foundry vs. Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloud Foundry vs. Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloud Foundry vs. Google Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.