No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Comodo MDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Comodo MDR
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
38th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete...
Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of Comodo MDR is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR is 4.4%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR4.4%
Comodo MDR0.9%
Other94.7%
Managed Detection and Response (MDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Navin Mohinani - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Forte IT Solutions
Have faced integration challenges but continue to benefit from strong security and proactive response features
The biggest advantage of the product, as I see it as a reseller, is its security and reporting. The automated incident response feature in Comodo MDR works fantastic. When customers install custom tailor-made software which is not recognized by Comodo MDR endpoint detection response tool, it runs in an isolated environment, virtual environment, sandbox environment. If it determines that this software is not secure, not verified, or not approved by system admin, it blocks the software immediately. The software will not run, and it sends a report to the admin email instantly. If there is any issue with the software or if any incident such as a malware attack or ransomware attack is happening, or something is trying to make changes to the system files, it immediately blocks the software tool and reports back to the admin. As a reseller partner and secondary admin for the customers, my team and I directly receive a mail, and we take control of that machine. It even blocks complete network access to that machine. On the hardware side, if there is a hard disk full or RAM 90% usage or CPU 90% usage or any of these incidents, we set up an alert notification option for it. The moment these incidents occur, it sends an alert so we can recommend customers upgrade their hardware or check if there is any malfunctioning software consuming too much RAM and CPU. This incident response use case helps us keep customer machines' performance to the maximum. The 24/7 monitoring capability supports a lot in contributing to our cybersecurity strategy. It is very much compatible with our goal.
reviewer2895252 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Analyst at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Round-the-clock monitoring has freed our small team and improves our threat response focus
In terms of improvement for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR, they just keep going full steam ahead. The biggest room for a house is the room for improvement, but as of right now, I don't have any complaints about CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR. Additional features that should be included in the next release of CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR would be on-demand scanning. That is something we have to do manually. For instance, if a user plugs in a USB device, even though in our environment we have USB devices locked completely, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR will still read those devices even though they can't physically access them. If it does find malicious software, those are manually done still, and that's per the SLA. I have had a few of those that have come up, but those have been few and far between.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"However, it offers sophisticated features, especially in scanning and analyzing activities on workstations or servers."
"One of the most valuable features is its around-the-clock, 365-day-a-year online technical support."
"The automated incident response feature in Comodo MDR works fantastic; when customers install custom tailor-made software which is not recognized by Comodo MDR, it runs in an isolated environment, and if it determines the software is not secure, it blocks it immediately and sends a report to the admin."
"The product is fairly new compared to others like Trend Micro or Symantec. However, it offers sophisticated features, especially in scanning and analyzing activities on workstations or servers. It can prevent malicious operations from spreading to other applications or the network. This feature is particularly effective because it operates at the IO level, unlike behavior or signature analysis used by other products. It contains threats and alerts administrators about whether they are false positives or real threats that need immediate action or support recommendations."
"The most valuable feature of Falcon Complete is that it is a full security operations center (SOC) as well as a SIEM solution, and it is fully managed."
"One differentiator of CrowdStrike is that it's nearly what I would call zero-touch on the workstation."
"The solution is quite stable, we find it reliable, it doesn't crash or freeze, there aren't bugs or glitches, and it's been good so far."
"The continuous improvement in detections and response times is valuable. They are more focused on threats that come from the cloud, not only that we see."
"We have experienced ROI using this solution, and the value is clear when you are able to stop a ransomware attack or other threats."
"The most valuable feature is that it has a zero-day approach. It does not work with the signature itself. It looks into what is happening on an endpoint and protects you better against threats that are not yet known but are captured in a signature. It provides far better detection than when it is only signature-based. You get much quicker protection against any new threat. This is the most important feature of the CrowdStrike solution."
"It works as a security device and provides an extra layer of security to our devices and computers."
"It is very simple to use and not overly technical."
 

Cons

"Users pay $60 per user per year, and in case there is an issue, support tickets take nearly three days or sometimes even more for a clear resolution or an answer."
"I think having a higher level of MDR would be beneficial, although it's quite expensive."
"I think having a higher level of MDR would be beneficial, although it's quite expensive. This would involve not just monitoring the network but also taking actions to stop and detect threats. We haven't implemented this yet, but we're considering it for our organization's plans."
"They should consider adopting the desktop version as a solution."
"Its support should be improved. The product is amazing, but the problem is that their support team is overconfident about the product. If something happens, they don't listen. They keep arguing with the customer. It should have more reporting. Reports are not that customizable. We need customizable reports for our customers, but they not there in CrowdStrike as well as SentinelOne."
"The solution is geared more towards larger organizations, so it can be difficult for organizations with smaller budgets to utilize the solution."
"As of recent, their MITRE scores were not as good as in years past."
"Some dashboards can be very complex, but once you get to know them, it is very logical."
"I would much rather see more refinement and investment into the prevention side of the equation, though CrowdStrike has a good engine."
"We have a problem with the CrowdStrike Falcon Complete agent. It was closing the communication with the network or other computers."
"They are doing very well in continuously improving their product. The only thing is that it is completely cloud-based, and some customers don't really like that type of approach, but you can only provide such a solution when you have cloud-based intelligence. On the other end, we know that it is sometimes a breaking point for some of the customers. They could potentially have an on-prem or hybrid solution. Any antivirus needs to have its features updated. If there could be a relay between them, it would be helpful, but that's very hard to do. So, you either accept that approach and have the benefit with this little disadvantage."
"It's my understanding that the reporting aspect of the solution could be improved. It should be more flexible and robust."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is high compared to other products. If you want to target a certain quantity, it should provide discounts to enterprises."
"The pricing falls within the moderate range."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is expensive."
"Its price is very high. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is 50% more expensive than Cisco AMP for Endpoints."
"It is expensive, but looking at the capabilities that it brings, it is reasonable. There are no additional costs to the licensing costs. If you increase the number of licenses, support is included."
"This product is one of the more expensive ones on the market."
"We pay 40,000 euros to use this solution."
"CrowdStrike has a reasonable price."
"There is a standard license to use CrowdStrike Falcon Complete."
"At approximately €60 per machine, per year, I think that it's a good price point."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise23
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Comodo MDR?
Areas for improvement are mainly on the software side. They are trying to integrate some functionalities, but their API integration with some CRM and invoicing tools is not appropriate or 100% comp...
What is your primary use case for Comodo MDR?
The major use case for the product is mainly for endpoint security and endpoint management.
What advice do you have for others considering Comodo MDR?
The real-time threat analysis aspect of the product helps minimize downtime. If there is an issue, there is an issue. The moment it detects a removable issue, it removes it in the background. One o...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete?
This service has definitely decreased the time needed for detecting, investigating, or responding to threats. As for how much it has decreased, I would say dramatically. It's hard to put a specific...
What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete?
An improvement I could suggest for this service would be a live support option because sometimes we reach out to CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR, and it takes some time to get a quicker response if...
What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete?
We acquired CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR about seven months ago. The security challenges or resource constraints that led my company to choose CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR stem from using a d...
 

Also Known As

Comodo Managed Detection and Response
Falcon Complete
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Palm Beach State College, Mercedes-AMG, Pokemon, Telstra, Goldman Sachs, Zebra
Find out what your peers are saying about Comodo MDR vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.