Contrast Security Assess vs Invicti Web + API comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Contrast Security and Invicti are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Contrast Security is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8, while Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Contrast Security holds a 1.7% mindshare in AS, compared to Invicti’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Contrast Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

Contrast Security Assess

Read 15 Contrast Security Assess reviews

5,122 Views
3,739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Read 36 Invicti Web + API reviews

12,369 Views
5,937 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Contrast Security Assess

Invicti Web + API

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and Contrast Security Assess are leading tools in the field of application security testing. Acunetix seems to have an edge with its continuous scanning and centralized dashboards, which enhance security assessments efficiently.

Features: Acunetix is known for identifying vulnerabilities, generating comprehensive reports, and detecting cross-site scripting. It integrates well with CI/CD tools and is scalable, making it suitable for large-scale security tasks. Contrast Security Assess offers real-time vulnerability detection and API scanning, providing deep insights at the code level. Its low false positive rate and seamless integration into development processes help developers maintain secure code.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could improve by offering pricing flexibility, reducing false positives, and enhancing API scanning capabilities. Integration features, particularly with CI/CD tools, also require enhancement. Contrast Security Assess could improve its reporting features, expand support for more technologies, and refine its user interface. Pricing and setup complexity present challenges, especially for small teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support on-premises and cloud deployment. Acunetix provides responsive 24/7 technical support and integrates easily into DevSecOps pipelines, whereas Contrast Security Assess also offers prompt support but has a more complex setup due to licensing nuances. Acunetix is noted for being more user-friendly during initial deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix's pricing is viewed as inflexible, based primarily on domain and application targets, yet it yields a strong ROI by enhancing security and reducing manual testing. Contrast Security Assess uses a tiered licensing model based on application and user counts, which some find restrictive. However, its real-time code vulnerability assessments and low false positives suggest potentially better ROI for large applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Web + API Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Web + API

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.8

Contrast Security Assess improves code quality, reduces costs, and streamlines workflows by detecting vulnerabilities early, enhancing efficiency.

Sentiment score

6.8

Acunetix improves security by identifying vulnerabilities, saving time and money, though ROI is variable but valued by many.

Contrast has probably saved us a couple hundred hours over the past six years.

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The speed of fixing issues is significantly improved due to the vast amount of information provided by Contrast Security Assess, making it quite essential for finding the root cause of problems in the source code.

reviewer2884320

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

8.4

Contrast Security Assess support is responsive and knowledgeable, with efficient issue resolution and high user satisfaction despite customization challenges.

Sentiment score

6.7

Acunetix customer service is responsive and helpful, though some users note delays and prefer reseller involvement for better support.

They go out of their way to respond quickly and very knowledgeably.

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Customer support is one of the strongest points of Contrast Security Assess, as they are really responsive and answer tickets in less than one hour.

reviewer2884320

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

Support staff not being familiar with the problem.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

Contrast Security Assess offers scalability across platforms but faces challenges with change management and limited technology support.

Sentiment score

7.0

Acunetix is versatile for large environments, easy to scale, but licensing and compatibility can be challenging for some.

It is fairly simple to install the agents for Contrast Security Assess and keep them updated.

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Contrast Security Assess's scalability is not an issue at all.

reviewer2884320

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.9

Contrast Security Assess is highly stable and reliable, with occasional environment-related issues and limited ColdFusion support.

Sentiment score

8.2

Acunetix is reliable, with stable performance, minimal issues, easy maintenance, and consistent results without unexpected downtimes.

We opened a ticket to customer support and experienced four weeks of disruption due to the extension malfunctioning in some of the .NET servers running Contrast Security Assess.

reviewer2884320

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Room For Improvement

Contrast Security Assess offers effective automation but requires better documentation, integration, reporting, support, pricing flexibility, and AI enhancements.

Acunetix users want better accuracy, integration, ease of use, and support due to high costs and limited features.

Regarding Contrast Security Assess's AI capabilities, I think they are missing a huge opportunity because they could lead the way in automatic testing and AI security testing.

reviewer2884320

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions.

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Contrast Security Assess can be improved as it checks the code and asks to fix the code that is vulnerable, and in that way, we can prevent potential hacking or attempts for people to inject malicious code.

reviewer2882520

Postdoctoral Research Fellow at a program development consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.

Adetunji Adeoje

Team Lead, Application Security at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Setup Cost

Contrast Security Assess offers scalable pricing based on application size and environment, ranging from $20,000 to $100,000 annually.

Acunetix pricing is considered high, with criticism over transparency and complexity, though some appreciate its value despite increases.

Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and SAST tools, but it seems to be worth the money.

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.

Abdullah Ozkan

Information Security Engineer at Tübitak Bilgem

The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Valuable Features

Contrast Security Assess offers real-time vulnerability detection with minimal false positives, enhancing security through CI/CD integration and proactive measures.

Acunetix provides comprehensive, accurate vulnerability identification and management with a user-friendly interface for cloud and on-premises deployment.

The ability to see what is going on and what has been going on in a given application and basically get to see what is coming across it in real time is helpful in finding vulnerabilities to remediate before production deployments.

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Instead of fixing each vulnerability reported independently, you can group them and fix them in a single point in the source code, resolving several vulnerabilities at once.

reviewer2884320

Management Of Quality Managers at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Contrast Security Assess has positively impacted my organization by improving the security features of our application.

reviewer2882520

Postdoctoral Research Fellow at a program development consultancy with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Contrast Security Assess report

Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.

Srinivas Walikar

Senior Business Development Manager at Intouch World

The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Invicti Web + API report

Categories and Ranking

Contrast Security Assess

Ranking in Application Security Tools

25th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Invicti Web + API

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Contrast Security Assess is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti Web + API is 2.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti Web + API	2.4%
Contrast Security Assess	1.7%
Other	95.9%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ryan Flake

Threat & Vulnerability Management Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Real-time assessments have improved remediation speed and reduced time spent on authentication issues

I do find that here and there with Contrast Security Assess there are user interface issues, particularly with how they work with libraries. The way that it works is people have access to library data for all applications, not just the applications that they should have access to. However, they are trying to fix that. The way the libraries are handled with Contrast Security Assess could use some work. I know that there is an additional service tier that allows for more in-depth library data. These are small things. Contrast support has been great in fixing any issues or getting back to us with questions. They seem to really be dedicated to the product.

Read full review

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Contrast Security Assess?

I was not involved in the negotiation of pricing for Contrast Security Assess, but I am somewhat familiar with setup cost and licensing. Licensing costs are fairly high compared to other DAST and S...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Contrast Security Assess?

I don't use Contrast Security Assess anymore, so I cannot comment on how it can be improved; I stopped using it four years ago, but at the time, I think the UI could be improved to be more friendly...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Contrast Security Assess?

I don't remember specific metrics regarding the outcomes we saw, but I can tell that the false positive rate was a third compared to a static analysis scanner; we used to have automation testing ex...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veracode vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 6% of the time

Mend.io vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Quotium Seeker vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

Oligo vs Contrast Security Assess

Compared 5% of the time

More Contrast Security Assess Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess

October 2026

Download Contrast Security Assess product report

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Also Known As

Contrast Assess

AcuSensor

Overview

Contrast Security Assess is an IAST platform known for accurate vulnerability detection. It integrates into development workflows, offering real-time insights into security issues with minimal false positives, supporting legacy applications and enhancing code security visibility.

Designed to integrate seamlessly into DevOps workflows, Contrast Security Assess automates real-time vulnerability detection and reduces false positives through its powerful IAST features. By continuously monitoring vulnerabilities, it provides a robust option for securing legacy applications and identifying vulnerabilities without lengthy scans. This cloud-hosted platform supports numerous programming languages, making it versatile for security testing across enterprise environments. Users benefit from detailed reports that pinpoint exact code locations requiring remediation, enhancing speed and efficiency in addressing security concerns.

What are the key features of Contrast Security Assess?

IAST Technology: Delivers accurate vulnerability detection with reduced false positives.
Seamless Integration: Integrates into development processes, supporting real-time vulnerability detection.
Open Source Security: Analyzes third-party libraries for vulnerabilities.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides valuable insights with real-time security feedback for developers.
API Interface: Enhances operational efficiency and streamlining with minimal false positives.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Visibility: Offers comprehensive insights across application environments.
Speed and Efficiency: Quick identification and remediation of vulnerabilities accelerate development.
Operational Streamlining: Seamless integration into DevOps workflows improves productivity.
Legacy Application Support: Effective for securing existing applications with ongoing monitoring.

Companies in industries requiring high levels of application security, such as finance and healthcare, implement Contrast Security Assess for its ability to enhance visibility and detect vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. Its seamless integration with DevOps processes makes it ideal for environments that prioritize agility while maintaining stringent security standards.

Contrast Security

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Buyer's Guide

Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Web + API

September 2026

Free Report: Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Web + API

Find out what your peers are saying about Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Web + API and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Contrast Security Assess vs. Invicti Web + API report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.