No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?
CrowdStrike and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CrowdStrike is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.8, while GitHub is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. CrowdStrike holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of GitHub users who would recommend it.
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...
Read 34 CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security reviews
  • 14,419 Views
  • 2,884 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
GitHub Advanced Security
Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews
  • 7,441 Views
  • 7,367 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the cybersecurity category. CrowdStrike has the upper hand in pricing and support, while GitHub is preferred for its feature-rich platform.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security offers real-time threat intelligence, advanced endpoint protection, and comprehensive threat management. GitHub Advanced Security provides seamless integration into development processes, superior code scanning, and proactive security measures.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike could improve intuitive alert management, reporting functionalities, and threat visualization. GitHub could benefit from customizable security scanning rules, streamlined management tools, and enhanced onboarding processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike offers straightforward cloud-based deployment and responsive support. GitHub provides developer-friendly setup and easy integration but lacks in user guidance during onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike is praised for transparent pricing and satisfactory ROI. GitHub has higher upfront costs, but its extensive features are considered worth the investment for long-term savings.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: September 2026).
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security
September 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 917,403 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (8th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (8th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (6th)
GitHub Advanced Security
Ranking in Application Security Tools
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 2.2%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security1.3%
GitHub Advanced Security2.2%
Other96.5%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Manish Indupuri - PeerSpot reviewer
Manish Indupuri
senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Provides centralized visibility and real-time threat detection across multiple cloud accounts
Regarding how CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security can be improved, I would say they can improve their support. There were a couple of cases where we needed to escalate issues in order to get proper support. That part could use some tweaking on their end. Additionally, the recent incident during the last summer literally impacted our systems. We had some of our workloads that affected the business, and it was a difficult experience. Apart from that, it is a good tool and the experience with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has been excellent. We did not find any kind of issues, but if they could improve their response to security-related incidents and provide on-time support or better understand our concerns and address them accordingly, it could be very helpful. Regarding needed improvements, I think they should enhance automatic alerting with CI/CD scanning and reporting capabilities. Additionally, it would be better to implement Falcon sensor health monitoring so agents are always active. We could know how it is behaving and how it is treating our environment. That could be a little helpful.
Read full review
Devendiran Kandan - PeerSpot reviewer
Devendiran Kandan
DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls
We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have contacted customer service, and they are fast."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The alerts are clearer, and the capabilities are much better than the others."
"The most significant benefit is how quickly malware and other malicious attacks are detected."
"The scalability of the product has been great."
"Our security has been significantly increased and it is pretty stable in our environment, which is one thing that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security literally gave us with a positive impact and makes it a good investment."
"The threat detection capability of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has always been the major seller, and it works effectively."
"The threat intelligence is the most vital feature"
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pros
"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."
"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."
"GitHub Advanced Security is a very developer-friendly solution that is integrated within my development environment."
"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."
"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."
"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."
"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."
More GitHub Advanced Security pros
 

Cons

"The improvements needed for CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security include reducing its high cost, which is currently quite expensive, and enhancing the executive reports that are user-friendly for technical engineers but require improvement for higher management."
"Different file options should be available, and clients should be able to select from the options."
"The SIEM needs to be more developed."
"There should be cloud storage scanning. We would like to have cloud storage vulnerability and threat management on any cloud storage."
"The main area for improvement is pricing, as it is quite expensive."
"There were some integration issues with this product."
"One area for improvement in Falcon Cloud Security is the support portal."
"The file integrity monitoring feature should be enhanced and offered more control"
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security cons
"The report limitations are the main issue."
"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."
"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."
"An area of GitHub Advanced Security that has room for improvement is customization."
"The customizations are a little bit difficult."
"There could be DST features included in the product."
"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."
"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."
More GitHub Advanced Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an expensive product"
"CrowdStrike Falcon is very expensive."
"The price is not too high, it is okay."
"The pricing is reasonable, neither overly expensive nor excessively cheap, making it competitive compared to other market options."
"It is expensive, but it adds value."
"It's an expensive package but does what it says it will do."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very expensive for us. Last month, we had a big issue that took much time and money to resolve. It slowed down our business and required our management team to get involved. We had a problem similar to the "Blue Screen of Death" issue many US companies faced. This incident used up many of our IT resources in just a few months. That's why we're looking for a replacement tool now."
"I am not the one who handled the pricing. A different team worked on it, but it is pretty expensive."
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pricing and cost advice
"The solution is expensive."
"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
I believe that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is not expensive for United States-based companies. For Brazil, however, this pricing is very expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
I am aware that just as we have a one-click sensor for faster deployment of the agent, there is probably a tool that will be available to deploy the sensor for container security. Falcon CAC and Fa...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
We use cloud security comprehensively, including CSPM, DSPM, AISPM, and CDR, not just for our organization, but because we are partners and provide services for our customers who are using cloud se...
See all answers
What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?
We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inli...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?
I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?
Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Wiz vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
Wiz vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 5% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 5% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 4% of the time
AWS GuardDuty vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
AWS GuardDuty vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 4% of the time
AWS Security Hub vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
AWS Security Hub vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 3% of the time
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Competitors
SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 13% of the time
Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 10% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 8% of the time
Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security Logo
Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security
Compared 8% of the time
More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
October 2026
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security reportDownload CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security product report
Buyer's Guide
GitHub Advanced Security
October 2026
GitHub Advanced Security reportDownload GitHub Advanced Security product report
 

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM
No data available
 

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security helps organizations stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. As CrowdStrike's cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP), it combines real-time cloud detection and response with proactive cloud security to help security teams prevent, detect, investigate, and stop modern cloud attacks.

Industry-leading threat intelligence and AI-powered insights help security teams understand how adversaries operate, uncover evasive threats, and respond with confidence. The result is a stronger cloud security posture, faster investigations, and reduced mean time to detect and respond.

What are CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's key features?

  • Real-Time Protection: Detects and responds to cloud attacks in real time.
  • Industry-Leading Adversary Intelligence: Turns intel into prioritized risk and threats.
  • Cloud Asset Visibility: Discovers and maps assets across the entire cloud estate.
  • Preemptive Security: Identities risks earlier in development to prevent insecure deployments.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

  • Faster Threat Detection and Response: Achieve up to 89% faster cloud detection and response
  • Improved Cloud Security Posture: Identify and prioritize high-risk vulnerabilities and misconfigurations faster
  • Reduce Blind Spots: Gain up to 72% faster ability to monitor the entire cloud estate
  • Compliance Assurance: Aids in maintaining industry standards.
  • Return on Investment: 264% Return on Investment over 3 year period

Organizations use Falcon Cloud Security to stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. It helps teams reduce blind spots, focus on the risks most likely to lead to a breach, and detect and respond to attacks faster. By connecting proactive cloud security with real-time detection and response, it strengthens security from development through production.

CrowdStrike

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?
  • Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
  • Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
  • Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
  • Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
  • Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub
Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security
September 2026
Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.