No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DataStax Enterprise vs Qdrant comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
Entities saved costs, improved performance, and reduced time to market with DataStax Enterprise, achieving 99.9% uptime and efficiency.
Sentiment score
5.1
Qdrant offers financial benefits by reducing costs, improving efficiency, and boosting productivity through enhanced response times and HNSW searching.
We have seen a return on investment with DataStax Enterprise as we saved a lot of money and time, despite investing more on infrastructure; our ongoing business success with a 99.9% uptime helps us earn more.
Senior database engineer at ToTheNew
Earlier it was around 15 months, and we have been able to deploy and scale our application within 10 months.
Software Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
We realized significant cost savings after migrating to DataStax Enterprise, as the previously slow critical queries now run significantly faster, improving efficiency and performance metrics across the board.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Thanks to Qdrant's open-source nature, our initial licensing and setup costs were nearly zero, allowing for swift testing and launch of our RAG prototype.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
This lowers our LLM input token consumption by roughly 30 to 40 percent, translating directly into lower monthly OpenAI API bills.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The time saved is substantial, with nearly three weeks or more for projects deployed with Qdrant Cloud in no-code platforms.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.8
DataStax Enterprise support is highly praised for efficiency, responsiveness, quick resolutions, and knowledgeable, proactive assistance.
Sentiment score
4.4
Qdrant's customer service is lauded for its excellent support, active community, and comprehensive documentation, reducing direct support needs.
I would rate the customer support a 10 because I always receive the help I need from them.
Devops Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Any requests I have raised receive prompt responses, often within minutes.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
Real-time transaction processing, both reads and writes, is where DataStax Enterprise shines the most.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
It's open source, so we house it on our server.
Chief Ai Scientist at Predictive Systems
The documentation provided by Qdrant covers most queries effectively.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
Qdrant's customer support is responsive and developer-focused.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
DataStax Enterprise offers exceptional scalability and efficiency, enhancing performance, reducing costs, and supporting multi-region deployments with active-active architecture.
Sentiment score
5.2
Qdrant excels in scalability, handling large data sets with efficient sharding, supporting rapid expansion and improved performance in Docker.
Overall, we saw a decrease in operational costs due to better resource usage and less manual work, which made my team more efficient and allowed us to focus on new projects.
DevSecOps Engineer (Software Development Engineer II) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
DataStax Enterprise's scalability is very fast with linear scalability and hence is very scalable.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
The active-active architecture helped us really scale and provide data to both Singapore and Indian users.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
In the recruiting agency project, the reliance on the vector database has expanded from storing hundreds of resumes to thousands.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
When Qdrant is deployed in Docker, it scales really fast, and you can assign multiple CPUs to enhance performance.
Analyst at Synergy Connect
Qdrant is highly scalable, supporting both vertical and horizontal scaling across massive vector data sets.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
DataStax Enterprise shows strong stability and scalability, reducing downtime by 40% and effectively supporting extensive organizational demands.
Sentiment score
7.8
Qdrant is reliable and accurate with high recall, precise vector matching, but requires regular updates and suffers inactive cloud termination.
DataStax Enterprise provides enough stability for our organization, and scaling can be done up to terabytes and petabytes.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
After using DataStax Enterprise, our system downtime dropped by approximately 40%, helping us avoid lost revenue.
DevSecOps Engineer (Software Development Engineer II) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Built in Rust, it delivers sub-15 millisecond response times and rock-solid update and write-ahead logging to guarantee that newly indexed data is immediately searchable without dropping queries or producing inconsistent context for LLMs.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
You need to patch Qdrant as soon as patches are released.
Co Founder & CEO at SaYukth Private Limited
It is easy to use whether on LangChain or on its own.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

DataStax Enterprise needs enhanced UI, automation, compatibility, support, and cost effectiveness to reduce complexity and improve processes.
Qdrant users seek improved clustering, schema updates, multi-query fusion, intuitive UI, integration, and enhancements in native tools and features.
There should be an alternative for restoring where data can be provided to live traffic so it does not impact customers in the case of a disaster.
Devops Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Better compatibility with prior versions in terms of codebases should also be improved.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
For example, it can implement some cost optimization where the license can be expensive, and compared to open-source Cassandra, cost is a concern.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Fast large-scale filtering operations could be implemented, such as automatic index suggestions, adaptive query planning, and smart indexing of metadata fields, which would make Qdrant even more efficient.
Product Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
While it has clustering functionality, it is not easy to set up, and not everyone can configure the clustering, so there is room for improvement in the clustering configuration.
Co Founder & CEO at SaYukth Private Limited
Incorporating embedding features directly in Qdrant Cloud would eliminate the need to depend on external solutions.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Qdrant offers cost-effective, scalable solutions through open-source access and predictable pricing, suitable for enterprise scaling needs.
For smaller organizations working under a tight budget, it might not be very affordable compared to other alternatives.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
I was not involved in the licensing for DataStax Enterprise, which is managed by a different team, but I understand it operates on a core-based licensing model, which is standard.
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 51-200 employees
The core product is open source under Apache 2.0, so initial experimentation and local integration testing cost nothing.
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Using Qdrant is free.
Chief Ai Scientist at Predictive Systems
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, since I am using only the free tier of Qdrant Cloud, there are no setup costs involved.
Lead Ai Tech And Tech Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

DataStax Enterprise ensures high availability, scalability, and security with real-time replication, fault tolerance, and easy management for businesses.
Qdrant provides efficient, cost-effective search and deployment with advanced features, enhanced performance, and seamless cloud integration for AI projects.
The scaling and speed of data access have benefited my team because the scaling and the speeding of data provide linear scale as well as multi-data centers' real-time replication of data such that we can maintain uptime even with the loss of multiple data centers.
Senior Software Engineer at Deloitte
I can confirm that the outcomes of using DataStax Enterprise show that our database uptime has increased drastically to around 99.9%.
Senior database engineer at ToTheNew
DataStax Enterprise has positively impacted my organization because during research for a NoSQL database, developers are very positive about using DataStax Enterprise because of its really easy setup and the querying to the database is very efficient.
Software Developer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The ability of Qdrant to handle high-dimensional vectors for my AI projects is pretty fast, and I think it's the best we have used so far.
Chief Ai Scientist at Predictive Systems
An accuracy boost was definitely observed from 45 to 50% using Faiss to around 85 to 95% using Qdrant, and the users are really happy as they are getting suggested really good schemes that would take a lot of time to find.
Analyst at Synergy Connect
Qdrant supports high-dimension vectors and cosine similarity, which any vector database should have, and it is pretty fast.
CTO at Honeycomb AI
 

Categories and Ranking

DataStax Enterprise
Ranking in Vector Databases
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (12th)
Qdrant
Ranking in Vector Databases
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (5th), AI Data Analysis (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of DataStax Enterprise is 2.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qdrant is 6.3%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qdrant6.3%
DataStax Enterprise2.2%
Other91.5%
Vector Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Pooja Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Devops Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Reliable backup and recovery has protected critical telecom customer data in daily operations
When I was taking the backup with a data volume of 15 to 20 GB, the full backup running for the first time did not provide metrics to understand what percent of progress had been made. We had to read the logs, but we did not see any percentage in those logs. This is an improvement item for DataStax Enterprise to provide metrics, a bar, or a percentage so we can grasp how much data has been backed up or restored. There are no graphs available to make us aware of how long the process will take to complete, which is a drawback I noticed during backup and restore. In addition, I notice a huge time lag during restoration because each node takes a lot of time to be added to the pool and to the cluster node, one by one. The entire time the production is down presents a concerning situation. There should be an alternative for restoring where data can be provided to live traffic so it does not impact customers in the case of a disaster.
Pawel Cislo - PeerSpot reviewer
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Adaptive assistant has delivered faster grounded answers and has reduced token costs significantly
The main limitations I notice come down to developer experience and native features rather than performance. Building hybrid retrieval and fusion pipelines still requires considerable manual orchestration and code. Having more built-in multi-query fusion strategies natively inside Qdrant would be a significant time-saver. Additionally, managing dynamic metadata schemas and tracking index build progress during bulk ingest could be more transparent in the web UI. To make things easier for developers, Qdrant could provide more native tools for managing payload schema evolution over time. As metadata needs change in production RAG systems, updating existing payloads across large collections currently requires custom migration scripts. Built-in schema versioning and simpler automated index testing during CI/CD would make running Qdrant in rapidly evolving production environments even smoother. I rate Qdrant 9 out of 10 because its speed, sub-15 millisecond retrieval, and single-stage payload filtering make it top-tier for production RAG pipelines. I deduct one point mainly for developer experience. Setting up multi-query fusion still requires extra boilerplate code, payload metadata schema updates require custom migration scripts, and real-time visibility into HNSW graph indexing progress during bulk ingest could be improved in the web UI.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataStax Enterprise?
I was not involved in the licensing for DataStax Enterprise, which is managed by a different team, but I understand it operates on a core-based licensing model, which is standard. The licensing tea...
What needs improvement with DataStax Enterprise?
When I was taking the backup with a data volume of 15 to 20 GB, the full backup running for the first time did not provide metrics to understand what percent of progress had been made. We had to re...
What is your primary use case for DataStax Enterprise?
DataStax Enterprise is currently deployed in production at Amdocs where we provide service to the AT&T account. To store customer data, we manage all customer usage information. Our company is ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qdrant?
I find Qdrant's pricing and licensing extremely straightforward and cost-effective. The core product is open source under Apache 2.0, so initial experimentation and local integration testing cost n...
What needs improvement with Qdrant?
I do not have any suggestions for how Qdrant could be improved. So far, I like what has been done and I have used it several times. I have nothing to add to it now, and I do not wish to add more ab...
What is your primary use case for Qdrant?
My main use case for Qdrant is local AI development. A specific example of how I'm using Qdrant in my development work is that I use it for my RAG development using N8n. In my drug development work...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ING, Netflix, UBS, eBay, Constant Contact, Aeris, Arise, ClearCapital, Dyn, Engine, Noble Group, Pantheon, Target
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. BMW 5.Cisco 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. Disney 9. Google 10. HP 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Heinz 15. L'Oreal 16. McDonalds 17. Merck 18. Microsoft 19. Nike20. Oracle 21. PG 22. PepsiCo 23. Procter and Gamble 24. Samsung 25. Shell 26. Sony 27. Toyota 28. Visa 29. Walmart 30. WeWork
Find out what your peers are saying about DataStax Enterprise vs. Qdrant and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.