

Rocky Linux and Docker on CentOS compete in the realm of enterprise-level operating systems and containerization. Rocky Linux has the upper hand in stability and compatibility, which is beneficial for production environments, while Docker on CentOS offers efficient application management.
Features: Rocky Linux offers stability, extensive community support, and compatibility with Red Hat, making it ideal for production environments. It provides robust support without cost. Docker on CentOS highlights containerization, quick deployment, and resource efficiency, allowing ease in building, sharing, and running applications, thereby enhancing flexibility and portability.
Room for Improvement: Rocky Linux could improve marketing clarity, Active Directory integration, and release updates more swiftly. Users also express the need for better official guides and faster security updates. Docker on CentOS could enhance security, reduce networking complexity, offer advanced orchestration tools, and improve documentation and security measures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Rocky Linux and Docker on CentOS demonstrate strong deployment flexibility, with Rocky Linux praised for community-driven support and ease of setup, resulting in minimal customer service needs. Docker users benefit from its reliable community aid and straightforward deployment processes.
Pricing and ROI: Rocky Linux is cost-effective with no licensing fees, leading to savings in server maintenance and deployment, which translates to a solid ROI. Docker on CentOS facilitates zero-cost deployment in open-source setups, minimizing infrastructure expenses and offering efficient resource management, thus reducing operational costs and labor needs. Both provide robust ROI through cost-efficient licensing models.
Previously, it took us about a week to deploy, but now we can deploy our entire app in one or two days.
A team of five is now able to manage the whole orchestration, the development, and the DevOps completely, which improved the delivery process.
We saw improvements such as less troubleshooting time, faster onboarding, more stable automation, better parallel execution, and cleaner CI/CD execution logs.
When it comes to return on investment, a lot of money is saved since we moved from a purchased license to the open source provided by Rocky Linux.
We save time through fewer environment-related issues and more consistent QA and deployment processes.
ROI has been good as we have significant open source community involvement.
We purchase the software and product from them, so when I have an issue with Red Hat or Docker on CentOS or Kubernetes, I create a ticket with the partner who works directly with the respective teams.
Most things can be easily found as resources online to help resolve those issues.
The customer support for Docker on CentOS is excellent, as there are very good community forums.
The support level is extraordinary, providing on-time assistance.
We have not yet needed to contact a vendor regarding Rocky Linux.
Even if we raise a support ticket, we receive a resolution or a reply from the team within two business days.
I can also scale it horizontally; in smaller environments, Swarm already works quite well, and in larger environments Kubernetes is then used.
For more advanced orchestration and automatic scaling, I would consider Kubernetes.
if we need more resources, we can just spin up a new Docker image, so scalability is good.
Even if the server is not responding and we want to attach the volume on another instance or a temporary instance, it is very easy and straightforward with no hiccups.
It has handled growth or changing needs well.
Particularly in virtualized and containerized environments, allowing us to scale resources without introducing major OS-level issues.
Docker on CentOS is not stable anymore because it is not actively being maintained.
I experienced no conflicts during updates, maintaining the 140 TPS targets effectively.
I usually do not face any troubles with spinning up containers or spend time troubleshooting.
Rocky Linux is stable, scalable, and it is very much easier to use.
Rocky Linux is stable.
Rocky Linux is stable and reliable for workloads, especially for QA and development environments.
Needed improvements for Docker on CentOS include better POC, searching techniques, and leveraging AI because AI can provide insights into standard practices, compliance, user specifications, security, logging, monitoring, and isolation.
Docker on CentOS could benefit from images that we can create or have, for example, just a module based on Portainer or some UI interface to create the containers automatically or create some internal APIs to make it easier to configure this by Terraform.
A guided diagnostic tool for CentOS would be very useful, checking repositories, kernel compatibility, firewall rules, the overlay, Docker daemon status, and container resource usage.
It is based on customer requirements, as they might want to use Rocky Linux or Ubuntu, depending on their needs.
Rocky Linux could be improved by having more integration with Kubernetes.
Currently, it takes more than one month to release a new package or kernel, so speeding that up would help reduce reported vulnerability remediations.
there is no licensing cost required.
There is no cost associated with either Docker or Docker on CentOS. It is completely zero cost.
Docker on CentOS is open source.
We switched to Rocky Linux because of the license price, and in our business, we don't need to have a higher cost as that is not a good idea.
There is no extra cost for a license if we are purchasing Rocky Linux from the AWS Marketplace.
Rocky Linux is free, and I can download it and deploy it in whatever environment I have, whether it be H3C, VMware, or Hyper-V.
It also ensures a consistent environment where applications will work on every machine, not just the developer's machine, and offers resource efficiency, such as no full OS per application, allowing me to share my infrastructure with multiple containers and applications.
Docker on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by making testing easier. I do not have to install older versions of applications and then make my system or service study.
Docker's lightweight architecture on CentOS significantly affects my resource utilization in a beneficial way.
Rocky Linux has positively impacted my organization, specifically through cost savings, because we did not have to buy any licenses or extra licenses of other distros, such as Oracle or Red Hat.
For production deployment, Rocky Linux is a great choice because it offers full RHEL compatibility without licensing costs, along with strong community support.
Since migrating to Rocky Linux, I've seen specific outcomes such as improved security because CentOS stopped the project, and security patches aren't being released.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Rocky Linux | 5.9% |
| Docker on CentOS | 0.5% |
| Other | 93.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Docker on CentOS enhances deployment with container isolation, image-based packaging, and environment portability. Users experience streamlined application deployment and rapid releases, benefiting scalability and market agility despite some challenges from its deprecated status.
Docker on CentOS supports building, packaging, and running containerized applications on Linux servers. DevOps teams employ it for managing container infrastructure and CI/CD pipelines. Key uses include web hosting, backend service management, and development of Node.js microservices, APIs, and NGINX services. It addresses deployment efficiency, although orchestration and lifecycle management require Kubernetes. Security improvements and stronger OS update integration are areas of interest.
What are the most important features of Docker on CentOS?Industries utilize Docker on CentOS for proof of concept development, machine learning, website hosting, and microfinance application development. It is pivotal in CI/CD processes, supporting robust container infrastructure for comprehensive DevOps and platform team tasks. Its application in diverse environments showcases the adaptability of containerized solutions.
Rocky Linux provides enterprise-grade stability and seamless Red Hat compatibility, coupled with extensive community support. Known for easy setup and minimal maintenance, its open-source nature ensures cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for critical systems.
Rocky Linux is an open-source operating system valued for its compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, making it an attractive choice for organizations migrating from CentOS. It focuses on stability, security, and long-term support, crucial for critical systems. Users benefit from seamless integration with automation tools and its strong community backing. While it offers ease of setup and package availability, areas like software availability and faster updates need enhancement. The system's UX design supports productivity, with potential improvements in documentation and security integration helping to maintain competitive advantages.
What Are the Key Features?Rocky Linux is widely implemented across numerous industries as a server platform and backend OS, supporting web hosting, big data projects, and cloud infrastructure. Companies in IT environments like Nutanix data centers and high-performance computing choose it for its compatibility with open-source tools, making it favored for automation with Ansible and monitoring through Prometheus.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.