DX Spectrum vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while Icinga is ranked #44. Broadcom holds a 1.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

DX Spectrum

Read 118 DX Spectrum reviews

14,941 Views
8,965 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,834 Views
5,719 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

DX Spectrum

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

DX Spectrum, CA Spectrum, and Icinga compete in the network management and monitoring category. DX Spectrum appears to have the upper hand in scalability and comprehensive management, while Icinga stands out in automation and flexibility.

Features: DX Spectrum provides extensive network topology views, effective alerting systems, and support for diverse device types. CA Spectrum offers reliable incident and event management and deep integration with CA products. Icinga is strong in automation, features numerous plugins, and its open-source nature offers significant flexibility.

Room for Improvement: DX Spectrum could enhance its configuration simplicity and update its MIB databases, tackling Java dependency and integration complexity. Icinga would benefit from better dashboard capabilities and more structured designs, with improvements in clustering and multi-tenancy being crucial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both DX Spectrum and Icinga are primarily deployed on-premises. DX Spectrum receives average to exceptional customer service ratings, although some users note issues post-acquisition. Icinga's support is average but is bolstered by a strong community and self-support systems.

Pricing and ROI: DX Spectrum's pricing model suits larger enterprises due to its extensive features, with ROI being driven by lower operational costs. Icinga offers a low-cost entry as an open-source solution, with optional paid support, making it cost-effective for smaller organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Spectrum vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Spectrum

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

17th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

118

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (7th), Network Troubleshooting (7th), DX NetOps (1st)

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

50th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Spectrum is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Spectrum	1.7%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	97.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PinchasAlbalya

Network Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitoring has become centralized and management now sees real‑time health of key network assets

The time investment required is significant, not because of difficulty but because of the need for free time to invest in it. We need to get the knowledge. We know there are many options, but we took an external vendor to install and make the customization. If we want to make others changes without paying for customization, we need to learn it deeply by ourselves. The tutorials are very complicated. They could work on that area. The tutorial part could be more simplified. I know there are many explanations, and you can get help or documents in one click on the current page in the product, but it is not very clear. If you want to do something new that you did not see from the vendor in the installation, it is not very simple. The documents are good for people that know how to operate the product well, but for new users, it is not simple.

Read full review

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a very good, refined product that, in the fault-tolerant configuration, approaches being bulletproof."

"I like the flexibility CA Spectrum offers to model networks with devices and different locations and technologies."

"It helps our NetOps group actually handle alarms in a way that lets them see the bigger picture of those alarms, and how they might affect our services. It helps us communicate information about the network state better to services that might be impacted by a specific network condition."

"It is easy to understand and determine when and/or where the network is failing."

"The most valuable feature is the auto-discovery, which is nice because you don't have to do anything to add a new component."

"Support has been very good."

"Implemented with Enterprise Customers across region, it is a very strong fault management tool with extraordinary correlation and alarming."

"The fault management is perfect."

More DX Spectrum pros

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

"Icinga2 was designed to delegate, distribute and balance tasks between several nodes."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"While deploying the tool, there were space and storage issues since the application loads for a long period each time there is an update."

"I only encountered stability issues in very rare situations; mainly when we used our own extensions for private management modules."

"Event correlation only works on one server, rather than on all of the servers in the same cluster environment."

"When we have a high capacity of traffic, we have problems with the stability of the system."

"Once something goes down, that is when we get alerted versus we need more predictive analytics in place so we know a case based on patterns putting AI in place, or something along those lines, so we know that there is a pattern growing that the systems going to go down."

"Occasionally, usually after an upgrade, we see a few issues but these are almost always cleared up quickly by opening a case with CA."

"I would like to see better scalability, and maybe, a more intuitive user interface. "

"We have a lot of different monitoring tools in the background, so orchestration has been a little bit of a challenge."

More DX Spectrum cons

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

"The user interface should be improved."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"Scalability is problematic. If you have a stable environment it's good, but if the environment is growing, I had some problems with Icinga."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"Currently, a perpetual license but some services are moving to a subscription"

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"DX Spectrum's pricing depends on the license number. It is affordable."

"It is very pricey. With the current trend of enterprises moving towards cheaper and more modern looking solutions like ManageEngine, SevOne, ServicePilot, and Paesller."

"It is expensive compared to other tools in the market."

"In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management)."

More DX Spectrum pricing and cost advice

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The solution is cheap."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"The solution is free to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

13%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	90

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Spectrum?

The price is very, very high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Spectrum?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Spectrum?

The university purchased DX Spectrum, called ICE. DX Spectrum NAC is working for us only on Cisco 9200 switches. It is not working on any other switch like C1000 or HG or any 2960X. Even other Cisc...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs DX Spectrum

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX Spectrum

Compared 5% of the time

Kentik vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

Zabbix vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX Spectrum

Compared 3% of the time

More DX Spectrum Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum

October 2026

Download DX Spectrum product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

October 2026

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

CA Spectrum

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

DX Spectrum is a comprehensive network monitoring tool designed for scalability and accuracy. With features like fault management, topological mapping, and customizability, it addresses network issues effectively while ensuring reliable infrastructure oversight.

Known for its robust capabilities, DX Spectrum excels in fault management and network monitoring, offering features such as Global Collections and Event Correlation for precise issue detection. This scalability allows it to monitor large infrastructures efficiently using SNMP traps. Automated device discovery and seamless integrations with tools like SOI and Zabbix enhance its functionality, providing users with a streamlined experience. The interface allows for deep visibility and is supported by REST API for improved integration and automation.

What are the key features of DX Spectrum?

Fault Management: Identifies and manages network faults efficiently.
Topological Mapping: Offers a graphical representation of network topology.
Customizability: Provides extensive options to tailor the tool to specific needs.
Global Collections: Enhances issue detection across networks.
Event Correlation: Reduces false alerts by correlating network events.
Scalability: Manages large networks with SNMP traps.
Automated Discovery: Automatically identifies and integrates devices into monitoring.
REST API: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.

Why should users consider DX Spectrum in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency through automation and integration.
Deep Visibility: Provides comprehensive network visibility and control.
Reliability: Ensures stable and reliable network operations.
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with multiple external tools.
Customizability: Allows customization to meet specific monitoring needs.
Proactive Management: Supports proactive issue resolution with accurate notifications.

DX Spectrum finds extensive applications across industries for network infrastructure monitoring. It is vital in sectors where maintaining service uptime and quickly resolving network faults is critical. Organizations leverage its configuration management, alarm/event management, and integration capabilities to maintain smooth network operations, especially in environments with large and complex network infrastructures.

Broadcom

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Sample Customers

National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

September 2026

Free Report: DX Spectrum vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Spectrum vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Spectrum vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.