Ekran System vs Safeguard by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Ekran System and One Identity are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Ekran System is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Ekran System holds a 0.9% mindshare in PAM, compared to One Identity’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ekran System users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Ekran System

Read 1 Ekran System review

1,181 Views
756 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 91 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

11,618 Views
6,622 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ekran System

Safeguard by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Ekran System and One Identity Safeguard are key players in security and identity management. While Ekran System stands out in pricing and support, One Identity Safeguard is often preferred for its robust feature set.

Features: Ekran System is known for user activity monitoring, session recording, and insider threat detection. One Identity Safeguard offers privileged access management, automated credential management, and detailed access controls.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ekran System features a straightforward setup and responsive support for minimal downtime. One Identity Safeguard requires a more complex setup, supported by detailed documentation and a dedicated support team.

Pricing and ROI: Ekran System delivers a cost-effective setup with a competitive price point and significant ROI in threat detection. One Identity Safeguard, though pricier initially, offers substantial ROI through its advanced security features and reduced breach risks.

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ekran System

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (4th)

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Ekran System is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 4.4%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	4.4%
Ekran System	0.9%
Other	94.7%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

Andreas Lalos

Director of Professional Services at Besecure

Early threat detection and diverse OS support with enhanced security

Ekran System offers a lightweight solution that does not impact the systems where it is implemented. It provides rich metadata for monitored activities and includes threat analysis capabilities for early alerting and investigation of unauthorized actions. Additionally, it supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It supports diverse operating systems and allows for monitoring and enforcement policies, like blocking actions for policy violations, and provides a retention of historical data in a lightweight format."

"The whole product solves the privileged access management challenge for our company. We have a secure tunnel, a secure session manager, and automatic logging of sessions, which is good for forensic purposes. We have a rich level of logs and can trace what happened on which machine and see who did what."

"There are a lot of features, so it's going to sound funny, but one of the most simplistic features, the Favorites feature, is the one we like the best. You do a full run-through of configuration to check out a server and then you can save that whole configuration as a favorite. So the next time you go in, you click on the favorite that you configured and it automatically takes you to the end so you can check the server out that much faster. It saves a lot of time..."

"One Identity Safeguard had a positive impact mainly in improving privilege access control, operational accountability, and audit readiness."

"There is ease of implementation."

"We went from our teams complaining about the old product every day to not hearing one complaint at all and, as a matter of fact, I hear compliments about how much they love Safeguard."

"I have found One Identity Safeguard to be stable."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"One Identity Safeguard is a game changer for us, especially for rapid business expansion and building trust with our clients."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

Cons

"Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka."

"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."

"I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

"Unfortunately, my experience with Safeguard by One Identity's customer support is not very positive. They tend to respond slowly, generally do not find solutions effectively, and it is challenging to request calls that could resolve issues more quickly."

"Now, I think the best way to improve it will be to optimize the software, because the software begins to consume more resources (physical)."

"One Identity Safeguard can be improved by fixing the documentation, which is very convoluted as of now, and addressing versioning, as some major bugs and issues are not documented well enough in the documentation, along with some patches and fixes."

"I chose a rating of seven because I believe the product still has improvements that need to be made in terms of supportability for new applications, such as SaaS solutions, and it does not have any native method of managing cloud-based applications, which I believe is an area to improve."

"The reason it is not a perfect ten is mainly because of usability and operational friction in some scenarios."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

14%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekran System?

The business model has become more complex with changes in feature licensing, yet they provide affordable options, particularly with the standard edition, which doesn't charge for the management co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ekran System?

Ekran System could improve in terms of communication to the market, particularly after their rebranding as Shiteka. The solution does not support other protocols beyond traditional monitoring chann...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ekran System?

The primary use case for Ekran System is third-party vendor monitoring and privileged access management monitoring. It is also used for privilege access management solutions.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Safeguard by One Identity is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the interface even easier to use, expanding reporting and analytics, and providing more customization options for access policies. It would be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is securing and managing user identities and access across the application with a focus on improving authentication, enforcing access control, and red...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS CloudTrail vs Ekran System

Compared 22% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 13% of the time

TSFactory RecordTS vs Ekran System

Compared 13% of the time

Teramind vs Ekran System

Compared 10% of the time

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Ekran System

Compared 9% of the time

More Ekran System Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Activity Monitoring

October 2026

Download Ekran System product report

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

September 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Overview

Ekran System is a comprehensive insider threat detection and employee monitoring tool designed for businesses seeking efficient security solutions. It offers powerful features ideal for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

Ekran System caters to companies needing to monitor internal activities effectively. It provides robust insider threat management by capturing user sessions and analyzing behavioral patterns. This tool supports various industries, aiming to reduce data breaches and increase accountability. Ekran System offers multiple deployment options, making it easily adaptable to different organizational environments.

What are the key features of Ekran System?

Session Recording: Monitors and records user activity for in-depth security analysis.
User Behavior Analytics: Identifies unusual behavior patterns by analyzing data.
Access Management: Offers granular control over devices and applications.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediately notifies administrators of suspicious activities.
Audit and Compliance: Provides detailed reports to meet compliance standards.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Risk Mitigation: Helps prevent insider threats and data breaches through vigilant monitoring.
Increased Security: Strengthens data protection and accountability measures.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to legal and industry-specific mandates.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes, reducing manual tasks.

Ekran System is used in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It helps financial institutions monitor transactions, supports healthcare compliance with regulations like HIPAA, and assists manufacturers in safeguarding intellectual property through detailed monitoring of employee activities.

Ekran System

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Deloitte, UPS, Seoul National University, KDN, Finat, Constitutional Court of Korea, Ukrsibbank

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira by Palo Alto Networks, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.