F5 BIG-IQ vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

F5 and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. F5 is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nintex is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.5. F5 holds a 1.0% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IQ

Read 15 F5 BIG-IQ reviews

2,008 Views
2,008 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

8,012 Views
3,205 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

F5 BIG-IQ

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and F5 BIG-IQ compete in the workflow automation and network infrastructure management categories, respectively. Nintex shines with its deep integrations and automation capabilities, whereas F5 BIG-IQ excels in centralized network management and load balancing.

Features: Nintex Process Platform provides seamless workflow automation with integrations into platforms like SharePoint and UiPath. SmartObject-based data management and a low-code design make it highly adaptable to business needs. Scalability for mobile and desktop solutions is another strength. F5 BIG-IQ offers robust centralized management, efficient configuration handling across multiple BIG-IP devices, and key features like load balancing and WAF, essential for network management.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could improve by addressing server intensity and enhancing logging and notification features. Users also suggest simplifying SmartForms for better accessibility to non-experts. F5 BIG-IQ users find creating rules through a GUI and better pricing models as areas of improvement. They also desire expanded platform compatibility. Complexity in feature management is a shared criticism.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers deployment flexibility with options for on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments. Its customer service is praised for responsiveness and a robust support network, including community resources. F5 BIG-IQ primarily utilizes on-premises and private cloud setups with mixed reviews about technical support, though less community backing compared to Nintex.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex has a high pricing structure, justified by its comprehensive feature set, leading to streamlined workflows and manual process reduction for a positive ROI. F5 BIG-IQ is noted for its competitive pricing models and straightforward licensing, providing good value. Although both platforms report favorable ROI, Nintex might require additional tools for full efficiency, impacting total cost considerations.

To learn more, read our detailed F5 BIG-IQ vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IQ

Ranking in Process Automation

26th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (15th), Workload Automation (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	2.3%
F5 BIG-IQ	1.0%
Other	96.7%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Bikale Kassu

Manager for Implementation and Administration at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has faced challenges with visibility and technical support but allows centralized management of multiple sites

The configuration part is complex for F5 BIG-IQ. The simplicity and visibility part needs improvement. The dashboard, especially the analytics part, needs to be more simple and presentable. For the security part, it is difficult to present to our management, so we have to capture it and prepare manual reporting options rather than getting them directly from the system. The automation part in F5 BIG-IQ is limited; we are still using it only for load balancing for some services. We haven't integrated it with our Accesso or implemented any automation options. The setup process for F5 BIG-IQ would rate a five out of ten.

Read full review

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is one of the finest in the industry."

"F5 BIG-IQ has always provided us with great support."

"We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."

"The product is excellent."

"It is quite good in a large environment where I have multiple devices; it is easy to manage the devices."

"Scalability: To move from larger boxes to smaller boxes, along with virtualization. So, we are not locked into a particular size."

"The GUI is fine, at least from an engineer's perspective."

"Features like AFM, the gateway, and Global DNS are the coolest features that save work for us."

More F5 BIG-IQ pros

"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."

"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."

"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."

"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."

"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."

"Nintex Workflow is user-friendly and saves time"

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."

"F5 BIG-IQ should improve by being a complete certificate management solution because currently, it is only for Venafi. Other automation platforms, should be added."

"For stability, F5 BIG-IQ rates a two or three because currently we are integrating it with our third party as a port forwarding service. We created many VIPs, but on average, weekly, we lose three to five connections, making the troubleshooting part a headache for us."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a complex solution, and it cannot manage everything related to BIG-IPs."

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"The solution's rSeries has been made free, and iSeries should be made free as well."

"For us, right now, F5 is too expensive."

"The shell, kernel, or Linux has something like a delay, especially with the Virtual Edition, when you are trying to implement it in the cloud and you want to access it remotely with web management. It would be great if they could improve their kernel. It was difficult for me, especially when I got started with BIG-IP. I was struggling to find which commands work with it. If you want to work with it, you have to be a Linux guy."

More F5 BIG-IQ cons

"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

"Because we're on-premise, it's more complicated to provide access to their own network."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud, and we have to purchase it all over again to get it on cloud."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."

"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."

"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."

"I would like the product to be cheaper."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IQ?

From the pricing perspective, F5 BIG-IQ rates an eight out of ten as it's reasonably priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IQ?

Currently for WAF, we are moving to another device, F5. We are not using Imperva. F5 BIG-IQ is the Web Application Firewall we're currently using, but regarding the Imperva products, now we are flo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 19% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 18% of the time

Camunda vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 8% of the time

Control-M vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 7% of the time

BMC TrueSight Orchestration vs F5 BIG-IQ

Compared 7% of the time

More F5 BIG-IQ Competitors

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ

October 2026

Download F5 BIG-IQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

October 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

F5 BIG-IQ simplifies the centralized management of BIG-IP appliances, providing load balancing and application firewall services. It ensures efficient large-scale operations and is user-friendly, enhancing seamless configuration migrations.

F5 BIG-IQ is designed for organizations seeking to manage multiple F5 appliances through a single interface, offering solutions for load balancing, web application security, and policy migration. Suitable for on-premises or cloud deployments, it caters to service providers and data centers. While some users suggest improvements in GUI usability and performance optimization, F5 BIG-IQ effectively supports web and email security, internet banking, and SSL operations. The GUI is appreciated for ease of use by network-savvy engineers, though dashboard functionality could be enhanced.

What are the standout features of F5 BIG-IQ?

Load Balancing: Manages traffic distribution efficiently across multiple servers.
Centralized Management: Streamlines control of F5 appliance settings from a single location.
Application Firewall: Offers robust protection for web applications against threats.
Seamless Configuration Migration: Allows easy transfer of configurations between devices.
Scalability: Supports operations on a large scale without compromising performance.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating F5 BIG-IQ?

User-Friendliness: Intuitive design for network experts, reducing the learning curve.
Error Reduction: Minimizes errors in policy management, leading to smoother operations.
Efficient Integration: Integrates with existing infrastructure, enhancing workflow continuity.
Cost-Effectiveness: Provides value by optimizing resource allocation and management.

F5 BIG-IQ is implemented across service providers, data centers, and diverse industries for robust load balancing and application security. It handles internet-facing web application security, supports SQL policy management, and enables efficient collaboration with F5 teams. Numerous organizations apply it for internet banking security, email protection, and spearhead SSL transactions, benefiting from its capacity to adapt to rapidly changing requirements.

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IQ vs. Nintex Process Platform

September 2026

Free Report: F5 BIG-IQ vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IQ vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our F5 BIG-IQ vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.