GitHub Advanced Security vs Invicti Web + API comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GitHub and Invicti are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 2.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Invicti’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 12 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,441 Views
7,367 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Invicti Web + API

Read 36 Invicti Web + API reviews

12,369 Views
5,937 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Invicti Web + API

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Acunetix and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the field of application security. GitHub Advanced Security seems to have an edge due to its seamless integration within development environments.

Features: Acunetix offers rapid domain scanning, comprehensive reporting, and effective vulnerability correlation. Its continuous scanning and strong CI/CD integration enhance its usability. GitHub Advanced Security provides seamless integration with development environments, copilot auto-fix, and advanced code scanning through CodeQL. It also supports secret scanning and allows for customizable queries.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs to address issues with false positives and subdomain scanning. Enhanced integration for collaboration and advanced report customization are also needed. GitHub Advanced Security requires improved API security measures and more effective centralized dashboards. Reporting could benefit from refinements to enhance tracking, and customization options could be more user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix supports on-premises and hybrid cloud models, though it requires technical setup. Its customer support is generally responsive but could improve on complex issue resolution. GitHub Advanced Security integrates smoothly into cloud-native environments, simplifying deployment. Customer service is efficient, promptly addressing user inquiries.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has higher upfront costs with domain-based pricing but shows significant ROI by improving security and reducing manual reviews. It is affordable for small to mid-size organizations, though licensing rigidity may be an issue. GitHub Advanced Security's subscription model offers flexibility based on team size but can become costly for extensive use, potentially impacting savings for large enterprises. Both products enhance security operations and reduce breaches, providing positive ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Advanced Security vs. Invicti Web + API Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security vs. Invicti Web + API

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,403 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Invicti Web + API

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (11th), Vulnerability Management (30th), DevSecOps (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 2.2%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti Web + API is 2.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitHub Advanced Security	2.2%
Invicti Web + API	2.4%
Other	95.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Devendiran Kandan

DevOps Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Security scanning has protected our pipelines but currently needs clearer dashboards and controls

We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security. Even though it is an inline product, I'm not seeing user-friendly things in GitHub Advanced Security. Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, before building and deploying the code, we want to block or do an advanced model, but it is not supporting. During deployment, code scanning is not good. It is a little complicated. It is not a straightforward method we can complete. We need expertise to get the full benefit, and troubleshooting sometimes requires going through that. The security overview dashboard is not really clear. It's not showing centralized information; each repo is showing, but if you compare it with competitors, it is not that great. Mainly in the centralized dashboard, enterprise level needs to improve. A centralized way where we can get that overall view is needed, and we want that code scanning and blocking deployments based on security. There are AI improvements, but however, it is not so easy to configure. It is multiple windows we need to go through and make changes or configure that. A few things we need to enable going into settings, and a few things we can find out in security. One product where security means the security dashboard should cover everything, but it is going here and there in many places.

Read full review

Rahul Kumar

Senior Engineer - Penetration Tester at a government with 10,001+ employees

Identifies vulnerabilities across bulk web applications but needs better support and cleaner reports

The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers. The centralized dashboard of Acunetix gives visibility into the security aspects of mass applications; for instance, with more than 200 applications, it provides a valuable overview of findings and necessary fixes, along with a high-level summary that helps us achieve compliance through monthly and sometimes weekly scanning. In terms of reporting, Acunetix is excellent because it can generate different types of reports, such as an executive summary report, detailed reports, and developer reports that can be shared directly with developers. Acunetix positively impacts my organization by helping identify outdated libraries and applications, including legacy applications vulnerable to old attacks based on OWASP Top 10, thus aiding in compliance checks for PCI DSS and OWASP. Acunetix provides a centralized report with compliance-related aspects and a vulnerability timeline, effectively helping reduce vulnerabilities and save time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features of GitHub Advanced Security are its flexibility and the multiple options it has compared to other tools."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"The initial setup was straightforward and completed in a matter of minutes."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"Segregation of reports is really, really good with Acunetix; it provides us with a lot of in-depth details."

"As a team, it's helped us to deliver better security assessments."

"If an organization has 100 plus applications and wants to use an automated scanner, they should definitely go ahead with Acunetix because it is very cost-effective and will save time compared to focusing on other solutions and performing manual security assessments."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

"The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have."

More Invicti Web + API pros

Cons

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"We used additional third-party solutions, but we replaced them with GitHub Advanced Security, even though I do not have a very good opinion about GitHub Advanced Security."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

"The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities."

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version."

"Improving the handling of false positives would be beneficial because it can be challenging to trust the findings flagged by Acunetix, and those findings must be manually validated."

"The Acunetix licensing and pricing model is somewhat complicated. If we calculated all of our domains and sub-domains, the sum would be huge; that's why we thought of leaving Acunetix."

"There are some versions of the solution that are not as stable as others."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

More Invicti Web + API cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

More Invicti Web + API pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I'm working with software development nowadays. As a process, we are using the dependent bot alerts and the code scanning for Java, and some of the code scanning is happening. Security secrets in c...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GitHub Advanced Security?

Dependent bots and the secret detection are good compared to others. However, code scanning is not finding very good results based on pipeline where it will scan and do code scanning. While build, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

In a typical enterprise environment, Acunetix is mainly used for visibility, detection, and investigation across network traffic. The main use cases usually fall into a few core areas, with primary...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I advise that Acunetix is the best option. Invest time in proper initial configuration and scope definitions. The tool is powerful, but its effectiveness depends heavily on how the authenticated ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Acunetix?

Everything is perfect and good, including the pricing and all related aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 4% of the time

Invicti vs Invicti Web + API

Compared 3% of the time

More Invicti Web + API Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

October 2026

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Invicti Web + API

October 2026

Download Invicti Web + API product report

Also Known As

No data available

AcuSensor

Overview

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Acunetix is a robust web application security testing tool offering rapid scanning, user-friendly interfaces, and accurate vulnerability detection with minimal false positives. It supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, making it versatile for various security needs.

Acunetix is distinguished by its capability to identify critical vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting and SQL injection with high precision. It integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools, supporting continuous scanning and large-scale application management. The centralized dashboard and detailed automated reporting streamline operations. Despite its benefits, users suggest improvements like reducing false positives, flexible pricing, and enhanced API scanning. Better integration with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps is sought, alongside more comprehensive customization and faster scanning. Mobile application scanning and improved team collaboration tools are also desired.

What features make Acunetix stand out?

Rapid Scanning: Delivers fast and comprehensive security assessments.
User-Friendliness: Intuitive interface simplifies operations for diverse teams.
Detailed Reporting: Automated reports enhance vulnerability management.
High Accuracy: Detects vulnerabilities with minimal false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration supports continuous development processes.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating?

Vulnerability Detection: Critical for identifying potential security threats efficiently.
Flexibility: Supports both cloud and on-premises environments.
Compliance Support: Aids in meeting standards like PCI DSS.
Scalability: Capable of handling large-scale web applications.

Acunetix is widely implemented across industries undertaking web application security assessments, including those requiring penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. It ensures applications meet security protocols and complies with standards while fitting into CI/CD workflows for secure pre-release checks.

Invicti

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security vs. Invicti Web + API

September 2026

Free Report: GitHub Advanced Security vs. Invicti Web + API

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Advanced Security vs. Invicti Web + API and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Advanced Security vs. Invicti Web + API report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.