Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Google and Broadcom are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Google is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while Broadcom is ranked #15. Google holds a 5.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Broadcom’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud

Read 81 Google Cloud reviews

17,973 Views
8,268 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Read 15 Pivotal Cloud Foundry reviews

6,275 Views
6,150 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Google Cloud

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Google Cloud both compete in the cloud platform category. Pivotal Cloud Foundry is noted for its superior scaling and performance, particularly for Java applications, while Google Cloud is recognized for its cost-efficiency and vast array of services.

Features: Pivotal Cloud Foundry supports CI/CD integration, Java applications, and smooth deployment capabilities. Its open-source nature ensures high performance with minimal downtime. Google Cloud offers integrated services, automated management, and robust security, making it user-friendly and flexible.

Room for Improvement: Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve its user interface, integration with tools like Kubernetes, and simplify public cloud migrations. Google Cloud needs better analytics integration, documentation, and support for diverse platforms and languages. Enhancing its pricing and memory monitoring tools is also suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pivotal Cloud Foundry provides diverse deployment options including private, public, and hybrid setups, with strong enterprise support from VMware. Google Cloud offers straightforward public cloud deployment and sufficient technical support, though users desire improved documentation for complex cases.

Pricing and ROI: Pivotal Cloud Foundry's higher cost is offset by its ROI in deployment and scalability. Google Cloud is favored for its flexible, usage-based pricing, beneficial for startups. Its pay-as-you-go model is praised but users call for greater pricing transparency to manage costs effectively.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (3rd)

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 5.8%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is 4.9%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud	5.8%
Pivotal Cloud Foundry	4.9%
Other	89.3%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

AnjaneyaVara Prasad

Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud services have reduced on‑prem hardware costs and now support flexible microservices workloads

Regarding potential areas of improvement for Google Cloud, considering that they are providing 300 plus services, some services could be improved. For example, if I am facing some network troubleshooting issue in GKE in Google Cloud, I have to dig deeply and enable some special logs, such as flow logs. To enable that, it is chargeable. At least for basic services, they should give end-to-end support. In terms of end-to-end support, if I am purchasing one firewall from Google and using that firewall, all firewall-related services should be free. If I want to troubleshoot something deep and perform deep troubleshooting, you have to enable some additional logs. That is not that good. If I have to enable additional logs and want to store them into Google Cloud storage, which is similar to an S3 bucket, it is again chargeable. Those kinds of things should be given as part of the package. If you take firewall, all firewall-related logs, activities, and diagnostics everything should come as one package. If you want to do some deep analysis, you have to enable these logs, and for that you have to store them in the cloud storage, which is again chargeable. We should not have those kinds of things.Regarding additional costs, it can vary case by case. If I want to do deep analysis, I have to enable some logs, and for those logs, Google is charging. I am already paying for my virtual firewall from Google, and I am paying the cost for that. If I want to do some further troubleshooting and enable some low-level logs, they are charging for that. So these are the kinds of things I am talking about. To do very deep-level troubleshooting and enable additional logs, they will be charging. Not only Google, but all clouds are charging for this. Functionality-wise, Google Cloud is fine. In terms of virtual machine deployment or VM instance, the functionality is good.

Read full review

reviewer2263239

Head of Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

PCF allows for fine-grained configuration, especially regarding scaling but routing limitations

Something that can be done better is canary deployment. So, right now, we're using blue-green deployment. The support for canary deployment would be nice. A few things, such as what OpenShift does better are cluster management. Like, you can manage the entire thing together. Currently, it's possible to manage all the clusters, especially when it comes to cluster management using straightforward configuration. As of now, we have to handle each application instance individually, which means servicing them one by one. It would be better if we could perform these actions as a group or in a more streamlined manner. One more downside is actually the cost of this environment. So, major downside of Pivotal, it's the cost. So, the runtime running costs are very high. Extremely high.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution can scale."

"The speed, security, and performance of Google Cloud are excellent."

"The most useful feature of Google Cloud is that it's basically completely managed or fully managed. There is no administration or maintenance needed from the user, and it's very simple to use."

"We are building our data solutions by using Google Cloud services, building analytics dashboards, and coming out with predictive analytics for education."

"The solution is very stable, the performance is good, there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze, making it reliable."

"Because it's a cloud-based solution, we are always using the latest version."

"I like that it is free. It's easy to use, and it's reliable."

"Google Cloud's most valuable features are its performance and ease of access."

More Google Cloud pros

"We find its stability and scalability valuable."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very easy to use compared to other cloud technologies, and it has very good performance."

"Stability is not a concern with this product."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very robust, especially for building Java."

"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is the UI, it is easy to use."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and that the deployment is easier."

"PCF is open, so the applications run really smoothly and with little downtime."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to scale. The services that connect to the database are also very good."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry pros

Cons

"It could have a reporting tool included."

"I consider Azure more secure than Google and Amazon because of all its certifications, but Google is secure enough and improving."

"Google Cloud would benefit from more detailed practical hands-on training especially in your mother tongue, not just English."

"If there were more documentation and training, it would be very helpful in explaining the underlying processes."

"There are some areas where Google Cloud could be improved. Specifically, they are not well-aligned with right-to-left languages like Hebrew and Arabic. We encounter numerous issues when we use documents that mix right-to-left languages with left-to-right languages, such as Hebrew and English. This lack of alignment creates significant problems. Considering more than 400 million Arabic speakers, this is a central area where improvements would be beneficial."

"It is complex to set up."

"The price of the license could be cheaper."

"Its integration with one of the third-party platforms could be better."

More Google Cloud cons

"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve the documentation. They are good, but they could improve more. Additionally, it would be beneficial if there were more use case examples."

"I would prefer to use Amazon AWS or Google Cloud Platform rather than Pivotal Cloud Foundry."

"There is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the future of Pivotal Cloud Foundry."

"There are no synthetic application monitoring and real-time monitoring features and they should be included."

"Something that can be done better is canary deployment. So, right now, we're using blue-green deployment. The support for canary deployment would be nice."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is not scalable, infinitely, because when you install it on a set of virtual machines it is very hard to scale. It's easy to scale on an application level, but not it is not similar to if you were using Amazon. Amazon you can scale thousands of applications."

"It is not straightforward to setup."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They provide user-based licensing plans. Its plan could be less expensive."

"Google Cloud is quite expensive, and I rate it at seven out of ten."

"Google offers a free account with minimal data backup and we can subscribe for more data."

"For the license, we didn't have to pay for any additional fees."

"The licensing for Google Cloud seems to be quite cheap and they're actually quite reasonable in comparison to Azure, which, as it turns out, is quite expensive. Even though Azure has a data center in South Africa it's still quite costly. There's no scaling, so if you go with the VM, you pay 2500 Rand. When you add another VM, it's another 2500 Rand even though you don't use the whole thing. With Google, you can go up as incrementally as you need to, even if it's just 30 Rand."

"Licensing fees are paid monthly."

"Its cost depends on specific use cases."

"The price of the solution could be better."

More Google Cloud pricing and cost advice

"Licensing is on a monthly basis and right now we pay $24/month. There are no other costs over and above that."

"The pricing is on the higher side and there are cheaper options available."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve. However, in this category of solutions, they are all expensive."

"You're paying for the number of virtual machines you want to install in the installation."

"We do pay for the licensing cost because we have opted for a private cloud setup. So, it is a cloud setup, and we have to make payments based on the cloud size. I do not consider it very costly when comparing it to the market."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is based on the customer's requirements. However, the price is comparable to other similar solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	38

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Google Cloud?

I think perhaps the usability of Google Cloud could be one of the things that might get improved. In terms of not having to type the whole instruction I need to input to the system, just maybe some...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?

My main use case for Google Cloud would be using the functions and the Vertex AI functionality, so mostly AI research and AI deployment. For my AI research and deployment, I use Vertex AI to extrac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Google Cloud?

On a scale of 1 to 10, I rate Google Cloud a nine. I choose nine because it combines a unique set of tools that are actually helpful and impactful on my daily work. Regarding Google Cloud's AI capa...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Google Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Google Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Bedrock vs Google Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Google Cloud Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 18% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 5% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 5% of the time

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud

October 2026

Download Google Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

October 2026

Download Pivotal Cloud Foundry product report

Also Known As

GCP

PCF, Pivotal Application Service (PAS), Pivotal Container Service (PKS), Pivotal Function Service (PFS)

Overview

Google Cloud offers a comprehensive platform renowned for cost-effectiveness, scalability, robust security, and seamless integration with tools such as Kubernetes, making it suitable for various business functions.

Google Cloud stands out for its ease of setup, stable infrastructure, and user-friendly interface. It provides essential features for AI, data analytics, and reliable storage, supporting multi-regional deployments for diverse applications. While maintaining minimal operational costs, it ensures simplified deployment and comprehensive application capabilities. However, improvements are needed in monitoring tools, customer support, documentation, and pricing options. Enhancements in stability, integration, and workload management are also required.

What are the essential features of Google Cloud?

Cost-effectiveness: Enables budget-friendly operations and reduced operational costs.
Easy Setup: Offers a straightforward and quick setup process.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs with vast resources and infrastructure.
Robust Security: Provides strong protection and compliance measures.
Seamless Integration: Effective integration with tools like Kubernetes and other applications.

What benefits and ROI can be observed?

Reduction in Operational Costs: Minimizes infrastructure and maintenance expenses.
Global Reach: Allows businesses to expand operations across multiple regions.
Flexibility: Adapts to different business models and rapid scaling needs.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitates integration with existing tools and platforms.

Industries leverage Google Cloud for infrastructure management, analytics, application hosting, and development environments. Entities utilize its cloud network, machine learning support, disaster recovery solutions, and big data handling. Many rely on Workspace tools for communication and virtual machine applications for efficient IT infrastructure deployment.

Google

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a scalable cloud platform known for its deployment ease, monitoring, and auto-healing capabilities. It supports Java and Spring Cloud frameworks, offering a stable environment for microservices and seamless CI/CD integration.

Pivotal Cloud Foundry facilitates cloud-based application development, focusing on private cloud security and developer-friendly tools. Open-source advantages lead to enhanced performance and innovation, providing robust deployment crucial for enterprise environments. While integration and documentation need improvement, its strength lies in microservice management, application hosting, and compliance with data residency regulations. The platform addresses migration and security challenges within enterprises, particularly in financial services, by supporting cloud transitions.

What key features does Pivotal Cloud Foundry offer?

Scalability: Dynamically adjust resources to meet demand.
Auto-healing: Automatically recover from system failures, ensuring stability.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlined processes for continuous delivery.
Microservice Management: Efficiently handle application components.
Security Features: Protect data in private cloud environments.
Developer Tools: Simplify application development with open-source resources.

What benefits should users expect from Pivotal Cloud Foundry?

Increased Stability: Reliable and consistent platform performance.
Reduced Deployment Time: Quick setup and initiation of services.
Enhanced Security: Robust measures for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes operational expenses for cloud transitions.

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is implemented widely in industries for deploying web and financial services applications, enabling microservices architecture within banking and enterprise environments. Its cloud diagnostic tools facilitate transitioning from on-premise to cloud-based systems, ensuring compliance with regulations and streamlined application hosting.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Humana, Citibank, Mercedes Benz, Liberty Mutual, The Home Depot, GE, West Corp, Merrill Corporation, CoreLogic, Orange, Dish Network, Comcast, Bloomberg, Internal Revenue Service, Ford Motor Company, Garmin, Volkswagen, Solera, Allstate, US Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, ScotiaBank

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

September 2026

Free Report: Google Cloud vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.