No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gupshup vs Quadient Inspire comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gupshup
Ranking in Customer Communications Management (CCM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Conversation Intelligence Software (3rd), AI Customer Experience Personalization (8th), AI Customer Support (6th), AI Sales & Marketing (6th)
Quadient Inspire
Ranking in Customer Communications Management (CCM)
1st
Average Rating
9.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Customer Communications Management (CCM) category, the mindshare of Gupshup is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quadient Inspire is 20.5%, up from 20.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Communications Management (CCM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Quadient Inspire20.5%
Gupshup1.6%
Other77.9%
Customer Communications Management (CCM)
 

Featured Reviews

Sanket Dofe - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Wynisco
Partner program has reduced messaging costs and now supports reliable, large scale communication
I believe Gupshup could improve in several areas. Since our partnership involves working at scale for multiple WhatsApp Business API numbers over their infrastructure, I noticed that Gupshup also provides WhatsApp Business API for single consumers, which I saw on their website and documentation. They charge additionally per message or template message on top of the actual WhatsApp Business APIs messaging rate. For example, sending a WhatsApp marketing template costs around $1.50, and Gupshup adds their own service fee per message, around 20 to 30 cents. For a single consumer working at scale and sending thousands of messages daily, this can become concerning. They should implement a solution where it could be a one-off payment instead of per message payment, allowing single consumers to leverage their service better. What would make it a 10? A better engineering team that solves problems and knows the ins and outs instead of just doing patch fixes would be ideal for me. Being a tech-focused person, I believe the system we rely on should be totally reliable and the people working on it should be reliable as well.
SP
Solutions Architect at Customer Centrics
Flexible, easy to use, and has fast output generation
Based on current market trends, Quadient has ticked all the boxes. For the next release, I would like to see more features in the Evolve Cloud offering. The Evolve Platform will be a game changer for Quadient as it will attract more enterprise customers who want to move their CCM platform to the cloud. The other CCM platform has its offering in the cloud, but it has some limited use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The amount we invested in Gupshup is actually a benefit for us because the ROI in terms of student admissions was growing each year."
"Gupshup is doing a good job in terms of accuracy and reliability, and they can keep doing so."
"Gupshup has positively impacted my organization in multiple ways, significantly impacting the bottom line and providing an overall return through the WhatsApp automation report showing around 398 percent on investment over a three-year period."
"We have achieved a 97 to 98 percent successful delivery rate for business-critical OTPs and transactional notifications."
"At BookMyShow, I typically achieved delivery rates above 95%, read rates between 60 to 80%, and click-through rates noticeably higher than other comparable tools."
"My main use case with Gupshup was flawless; it was very user-friendly, and I personally loved using it."
"I think the best feature Gupshup offers is the very good documentation, and I appreciate how they provide assistance when we need it, as well as the architecture of the documentation."
"Gupshup has impacted my organization very positively; it is a good platform, very reliable, and this is the first platform that we have used where we did not feel any need to switch over to any competitor because Gupshup is everything it markets itself to be."
"Inspire is fast, reliable, and pretty unlimited in what you can do."
"The most valuable features are the easy-to-use document composition tool and the automatization tools."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it is truly multi-channel and completely modular."
"It’s easier to maintain and edit communication, and it error-proofs our regulatory responsibility."
"The most valuable aspect of Inspire is that it is constantly being upgraded to keep up with current market trends."
"The user-friendly way that workflows in Quadient Inspire can be composed and organized goes a long way towards minimizing the time spent creating complex tasks, thus creating more available programming time/capacity for new jobs. While original scripting knowledge is preferential to using the tool effectively, the modular structure and GUI interface makes it much easier to grasp than otherwise might have been the case."
"This solution does everything we need, plus so much more."
"It supports various types of input files and can generate different types of output files."
 

Cons

"I think their customer support needs to be improved as they have a very slow response time and lack local support, especially in Indonesia."
"If I suggest an improvement, I would desire to see deeper analytics."
"Gupshup could be improved by adding more selection of templates."
"What would make it a 10? A better engineering team that solves problems and knows the ins and outs instead of just doing patch fixes would be ideal for me."
"I think Gupshup could be improved with online support or WhatsApp support so that we can talk directly with an agent, instead of working only by email."
"I would appreciate more granular error code documentation for edge case API delivery failures, deeper out-of-the-box integration with cloud monitoring tools such as AWS CloudWatch or DataDog for native metric scraping, and a more responsive administrative console when querying massive historical message logs."
"The main thing the support team should do is give immediate resolution, not take a day or two or three days."
"Sometimes it stays in the pending part and it might not get approval from the Meta side, so that is one thing which needs to be improved."
"It would be great to have an easy interface to handle the 80% of simple impositions and still have the complexity needed for the other 20%."
"I would like more wizards to be included in the scripting module and perhaps an online training course on Udemy would be a useful asset."
"I feel the scripting modules are very powerful but are difficult to use if you do not have the programming knowledge."
"In the (near) future I would love to be able to merge Excel XLS data with the same level of ease that we can currently merge CSV data sources (including text attributes, which are lost when using the CSV format)."
"We'd like to be able to see page breaks when we proof the blocks."
"What can be improved are the new additions to the solution."
"More flexibility in editing."
"The licensing and setup costs historically have been a roadblock, but there have been improvements on this over the years as things move into the cloud."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I can tell from my personal experience that if you know how to use the software, the return on investment comes in a really short time."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Communications Management (CCM) solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Construction Company
12%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gupshup?
The pricing part was taken care of by the finance team, so we do not have any idea about the pricing part.
What needs improvement with Gupshup?
One thing I feel is that creating a template takes a bit of time for us. After creation, the approval part takes time. Sometimes it stays in the pending part and it might not get approval from the ...
What is your primary use case for Gupshup?
I have been using Gupshup since the beginning of my journey with GITAM for communications. It helped me in sending all WhatsApp bulk messages to all targeted students and parents. The main purpose ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
GMC Software Inspire
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Aetna, Allstate, Bradesco, Stralfors, Ping An Bank, KPMG, Aegon, Allison Payment Systems, TenStep, Pacific Life, Metlife, Transamerica, Societe Generale, Canacord Genuity, Pondres, Heeter, DTS Communicate, Melbourne Mail Management, Eximia, Brightsource, Salem One, Epsilon Data Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Gupshup vs. Quadient Inspire and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.