HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs NetApp Private Storage comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and NetApp are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while NetApp is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.0% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

20,721 Views
5,387 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

NetApp Private Storage

Read 15 NetApp Private Storage reviews

3,845 Views
3,845 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

NetApp Private Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and NetApp Private Storage compete in the data management category. HPE 3PAR holds the upper hand in thin provisioning and flexible scalability, while NetApp excels in cloud integration and unified storage.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers features like thin provisioning, ASIC-based operation, and adaptive optimization. Its integration with various technologies and high performance through ASIC design are notable. NetApp Private Storage is known for smooth cloud integration, unified storage capabilities, and flexible management, providing seamless cloud and on-premises handling.

Room for Improvement: HPE 3PAR needs enhancements in firmware stability, user guides, and data deduplication. It also seeks improvements in automation tools. NetApp's setup can be complex, requiring more user-friendly interfaces and faster support responses. Both brands face criticism over licensing structures but deal differently with cloud integration issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment is generally straightforward for both products, with HPE 3PAR noted for flexible scalability and seamless on-premises integration. NetApp provides broad deployment options, especially with cloud environments. HPE is praised for reliable technical support and proactive issue resolution, whereas NetApp experiences varied support responses.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ is expensive but valued for its performance and innovative features, justifying the investment. Users indicate varied ROI perceptions, citing reduced management costs and improved throughput. NetApp's pricing is also high, but its flexibility and cloud integration offer operational efficiencies. However, some users question its value compared to cost when choosing between these options.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (10th)

NetApp Private Storage

Ranking in NAS

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 5.0%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Private Storage is 4.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	5.0%
NetApp Private Storage	4.4%
Other	90.6%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Atilla Celiloglu

Broadcast Technology Director at tv8

Has supported continuous broadcasting with reliable performance and consistent operations

They can make more solutions for cloud integration in NetApp Private Storage. It should be easier to use the cloud S3 integration, maybe from a NetApp interface, where users can choose the type of storage before sending to S3. I would like to see more audit and performance logs via cloud integrations and ONTAP. Without the need for separate software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We were expecting 2:1 as a rule of thumb, but in reality, we ended up sitting at greater than 8:1 across the entire array with all compaction and reduction features factored in."

"HPE does the initial setup (hardware and initialization) which makes things much easier, and using 3PAR is simple and straightforward, unlike its competitors such as EMC."

"The stability is what we consider to be the best feature it provides, and the stability of this solution is what conquers us every day."

"The remote copy group failover is very useful and has helped us."

"This is a very robust product and it offers everything that we are looking for."

"Because we are so happy with 3PAR, it's so reliable for us, for the moment we don't see any move to Nimble storage."

"This product is stable, aside from the performance problems we had."

"At the end of the day, 3PAR was the most valuable."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"The most valuable feature of NetApp Private Storage is out-of-the-box integration with the SAN switches. They are much easier compared to Dell solutions. Additionally, the connector that comes with the solution that allows connection back to the Cisco SAN switches is very good. In Dell, I would need to use an FCIP or CIP port that is required."

"For recording and stability, NetApp Private Storage is the best."

"The solution scales well."

"NetApp is faster than other storage brands."

"The most valuable feature is integration."

"Disaster recovery. And I like the security very much. I think they have the needed options for security. Can manage NPS using the same tools and process that we use today."

"NetApp has really added a lot of features over the years to improve the product and performance. They can do things now like control ingress. They can control egress."

"The beauty is it's worth it."

More NetApp Private Storage pros

Cons

"The GUI interface could be improved."

"3PAR graduated long ago and has more recently picked up an advanced degree in flash. It has already checked the boxes of enterprise availability and expansion. Heck, it might seem downright old and lacking ingenuity."

"We are waiting for the compression to use on a daily basis."

"The initial setup was complex in that requirements were not communicated well through the VAR and some parts needed to be sent back (PDU’s were of the wrong type) and the VAR assumed a Virtual Storage manager would be used, but a physical manager was both requested and required, which created an installation delay while the correct equipment was shipped."

"The backup batteries, the WPS, could be better. When we had the outage we shut down the entire thing and tried the backup generators, and the electricity was out for 20 minutes and the HPE battery didn't last 10 minutes."

"However, when the issue came with Spectre, and then the L1TF vulnerability came out, those really affected us, so hopefully we will find a solution that meets our needs going forward."

"Their installation and design engineers leave something to be desired."

"...sizing is everything. If you don't do the sizing right and you don't understand every detail of the product, how it works, you can be in a very unpleasant situation when you pay half a million dollars and you have a product that does not work as you expected."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"We had to write a number of custom tools or scripts ourselves to use it as a staging area between our on-premises datacenter and our cloud installation."

"They need a little more technical people in Akola. Most of the NetApp people are in Bangalore, Mumbai, or Delhi, but there are very few in Akola. I think NetApp has few technicians in Akola because they mostly rely on partners to service this area."

"The hardware does not last as long as it could with new software."

"If you overthink provisioning, if you over-allocate, if it gets full, or if something crazy happens and you haven't been watching, then you can lose data."

"NetApp Private Storage is still integrated into the ISCSI connectivity and the FC protocol. I would recommend them to migrate to the FCIP because the SAN switches are moving further to an FCIP, and are scaling out of the ISCSI connectivity. Sooner or later, that will be an issue for NetApp Private Storage. An NFCIP should be available to them moving three years down the line."

"The solution could improve by having better support experts. For example, they do not have clear instructions on configuration."

"It is not the fastest storage solution."

"I'm not sure how easy it is to use on the cloud versus on-prem. If they have different user experiences, they should work to make the two as similar as possible to make it easy for a user to understand both even if they only deal mainly with one."

More NetApp Private Storage cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need to properly assess your needs before buying the solution since there are chances of overpaying. The type of configuration that you choose can make the price go higher or lower."

"We purchased the solution as CapEx and we only pay support now. I find the pricing fantastic."

"Making the decisions to buy it can be complex."

"This product is quite expensive and in addition, we subscribe to 24/7 support with a four-hour response time."

"If HPE reduced the price of 3PAR StoreServ they would be more attractive to mid-range companies."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution has two parts: software and hardware, and you need to buy licenses for some features."

"It is quite difficult to decide on the cost. At one point, I was the project lead to cover with some people, but the price was important and we had its compression calculated. At that moment, it was fair because that was one of the things moving their product due to the cost of HPE 3PAR StoreServ as they were competing with Hitachi and IBM A9000, which I'm not sure if is still available."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"We negotiate whatever deal we can get on the type of storage that it is, but it's totally under our control,."

"The price could be lower."

"In general, I am pleased with the pricing, though it is a little high."

"NetApp Private Storage is cheaper here in India compared to other solutions, such as Dell."

"The price of NetApp Private Storage is similar to other solutions. There is typically an annual license required for this solution."

"The product is costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Private Storage?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Private Storage?

It consists of a large production company and national television channels broadcasting 24/7. We wanted to choose a stable product with flawless SLA levels for an organization that broadcasts 24/7....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NetApp Private Storage?

I believe it will deliver the expected performance and stability for television channels and production studios. On a scale of 1-10, I rate NetApp Private Storage an 8.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 14% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 11% of the time

FreeNAS vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 7% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 7% of the time

Hitachi NAS Platform vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 6% of the time

More NetApp Private Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

October 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Private Storage

October 2026

Download NetApp Private Storage product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

NPS

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

NetApp Private Storage provides efficient, cost-controlled storage solutions with fast, seamless cloud integration, ensuring robust security and scalability for diverse applications.

NetApp Private Storage integrates smoothly with cloud platforms like Azure or AWS, offering a unified approach to storage through the ONTAP operating system. With SAN integration, disaster recovery, and strong security measures, it supports scalability and diverse use cases. Users appreciate its effective backup solutions and reliability, enhanced by Snapshot functionality. However, enhanced cloud integration tools and user-friendly interface improvements are desired. Users often confront configuration complexity and support access issues, along with costly upgrade cycles due to hardware limitations.

What are the key features of NetApp Private Storage?

ONTAP Operating System: Facilitates unified storage management across platforms.
Integration Capabilities: Ensures seamless connections with cloud providers like AWS and Azure.
Disaster Recovery: Provides robust options to safeguard data.
Security Measures: Offers strong protection against potential threats.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing storage demands.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Control: Allows efficient management of storage expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex storage management tasks.
Speed: Enhances data processing and access times.
Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across applications.
Flexibility: Adapts to a variety of storage environments and needs.

NetApp Private Storage is employed in industries requiring robust storage solutions, supporting OpenStack cloud backends, VMware environments, and media broadcasts. It aids in database server replication and hybrid flash storage, managing marketing data and facilitating ESXi backend solutions through NFS shares, SnapMirror, and file replication. Recognized for simplifying storage management and connectivity, it efficiently supports demanding applications across sectors.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

ASE IT, Concerto Cloud

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage

September 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. NetApp Private Storage report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.