HPE Zerto Software vs Nutanix Move comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Nutanix are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1, while Nutanix is ranked #12. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Nutanix’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 364 HPE Zerto Software reviews

26,822 Views
2,682 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Nutanix Move

Read 8 Nutanix Move reviews

1,529 Views
1,498 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Nutanix Move

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

HPE Zerto Software and Nutanix Move are both prominent in the data protection and workload migration space. Nutanix Move seems to hold an advantage in specific categories due to its ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, as indicated in various feature sets and pricing structures.

Features: HPE Zerto Software stands out with robust disaster recovery capabilities highlighted by its continuous data protection, near-zero recovery time objectives (RTO), and hypervisor-based replication. The solution supports multi-cloud environments, providing seamless migration between on-premises and cloud systems. Nutanix Move features its ability to automate migration processes with minimal impact on live environments, retaining settings like IP and MAC addresses while flawlessly adapting workloads across platforms such as VMware and Hyper-V.

Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance its analytics engine to reduce reliance on external tools and address potential service reductions, especially for Hyper-V users. Its complex deployment process might benefit from a streamlined approach. Nutanix Move, while effective for new migrations, could expand its support to older systems and workloads requiring tailored migration paths, enhancing compatibility with outdated software versions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nutanix Move excels with its straightforward set-up, allowing for automatic and seamless transitions between platforms with robust support to guide users. In contrast, HPE Zerto Software requires a more intricate deployment method, necessitating detailed guidance to ensure successful implementation.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software's initial investment is generally higher yet offers considerable ROI through its advanced data protection features like near-zero RTOs. Nutanix Move provides a more cost-effective solution initially, with lower setup expenses promising a quicker ROI through its streamlined migration processes, offering significant affordability in transitioning infrastructures.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Move Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Move

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Migration

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

364

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Backup (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Nutanix Move

Ranking in Cloud Migration

12th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 4.6%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Move is 2.5%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	4.6%
Nutanix Move	2.5%
Other	92.9%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Aslah Faseel K

DevOps Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Celso Toledo

Senior Infrastructure Manager, Information Technology at Pediatrix

A highly stable and simple solution used to effectively migrate VMs

The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is its simplicity. Nutanix Move is a seamless product. You point the solution to your VM. It runs the scripts on the VMs and runs a bunch of scripts on it. Once done on the VMware side, it powers the VM down, disconnects the mix so you don't have any conflicts on your network, and brings up the converted VM on Nutanix, and you're back to work. Depending on the size of the VM and how much data you're seeding, it might be an hour, a day, or two. After the converting piece or a minute's cutover, the solution runs the final scripts, syncs up the last data, and you're back up and running. Nutanix Move is very seamless and does not impact the business.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution is the ease of use. In the event of a disaster, you don't need a technical person to actually run the software. You can bring anybody in, with the right instructions and credentials, and they can run the solution."

"Speed of recovery has been very effective in getting our information back as fast as we're able to get it. The daily backup solution that we use alternatively only allows a single backup versus having continuous backup replication with Zerto, it's a no-brainer."

"I am quite familiar with the user interface. It is easy for me to operate and perform different operations because I am an experienced user. In my opinion, the user interface is easy to understand and operate. The user interface is user-friendly."

"The ability to perform DR testing to ensure data integrity is critical."

"It has simplified our disaster recovery plan."

"The ability to quickly bring up VMs within a test environment allows us to test our disaster recovery functions and ensures that they would function just as well in an actual disaster scenario."

"The features of HPE Zerto Software that I prefer the most are the backup and the vault. It helps with business continuity."

"The way we can use checkpoints from each VM to restore them is an excellent feature, and the replication is great."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"The easy migration is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is how simple it is and the benefit of what it does."

"The solution is stable."

"We can change the hypervisor without any downtime."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is its simplicity."

"It is easy to set up the solution."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"Nutanix Move has changed helped in making the painful process of migrating from one hypervisor to another better."

More Nutanix Move pros

Cons

"You can create a VPG and put anywhere from one to 17 servers in that group. We build them one by one."

"Needs better reporting."

"The post-configuration part could be improved. For example, it would be super helpful to have the ability to modify DNS. Once the migration is done, we want to do some more modifications to the endpoint."

"When we migrated to new virtual infrastructure, we had to set up Zerto all over again. And that took a long time. It would be nice if Zerto had some sort of migration tool where you could migrate all of your virtual machines to a new infrastructure without having to set up Zerto all over again."

"HPE Zerto Software didn't help to reduce my organization's DR testing; I was shocked by it since whenever I actually performed the DR test, it took my environments down."

"It was a little bit expensive."

"I'm not sure if it has throttling, meaning, what's going over the wire and how we can throttle that to reduce the amount of data that's going across the bandwidth. I can't remember if that's something that's in this product. It might be in the more recent version."

"They could improve their online documentation."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"We'd like Nutanix to be more flexible in the future."

"Nutanix Move could be made more scalable, so you could do more instead of taking five or ten VMs at a time."

"We can migrate from Hyper-V to Acropolis, but we can't move from Acropolis back to Hyper-V."

"I think Nutanix Move could be improved by adding a way to retry failed migrations. Sometimes when seeding fails, there's no way to redo it without recreating the whole migration plan. I'd like a button to restart the process without creating a migration plan."

"The most valuable feature is the automation. The solution will clone the data that you want to migrate, shut down the virtual machine, disconnect it from the network and start the clone virtual machine inside the solution's platform."

"We cannot use the solution to move a machine from Nutanix to other hypervisors."

"When you have regular questions, like how do I do something in the tool or when you want to know when can I do anything in the product, the solution's support team can take around three to four days to give you an answer, or they may even sometimes take more time."

"They should have some tools to migrate the workload from another Nutanix platform."

More Nutanix Move cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If it were easier to license, and to scale it out a little bit more economically, that'd be a godsend. At the end of the day, my druthers would be to have all 200 of our servers protected by this platform. But for a company our size, that stretches our IT budget and it just doesn't make economic sense."

"Pricing is adequate at the standard of the product, but there could be "always" some improvement. We would like to see a consumption model that would charge in a DR scenario, where you're failing over and consuming those resources, instead of a per-protected-node model."

"The cost is one of the only drawbacks of Zerto because it's very high, and the overall impact of the solution on our organization is relatively low. This is why we are trying to figure out if another product could fulfill the same role for cheaper."

"Compared to other options like SRM, Zerto is a more expensive solution, making it primarily suitable for larger organizations."

"The pricing doesn't seem too bad for what it does."

"It was pretty appropriate. It was not too cheap, not too expensive. It was just about right."

"It is very expensive. It is overpriced. No doubt. What held us up for many years from committing to buying it was always the cost. That's also why we only have 10 licenses."

"We're getting our money's worth with Zerto."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source."

"The product is available for free."

"The tool is bundled as part of the Nutanix license."

"It is a free tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Healthcare Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	97
Midsize Enterprise	94
Large Enterprise	209

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with the price, implementation costs, and licensing of HPE Zerto Software is that, as I mentioned before, the licensing is somewhat complicated and the prices are a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

I believe HPE Zerto Software could improve in certain aspects that emerged after HPE acquired this software. Following the acquisition of this product by HPE, I think there are certain aspects that...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

OpenText Migrate vs Nutanix Move

Compared 28% of the time

Avepoint Migration Platform vs Nutanix Move

Compared 22% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Nutanix Move

Compared 12% of the time

Nasuni vs Nutanix Move

Compared 9% of the time

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Nutanix Move

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Move Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

October 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Move

October 2026

Download Nutanix Move product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

No data available

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Nutanix Move simplifies automated and seamless migrations without downtime, integrating smoothly with VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V. It automates essential tasks, retaining network configurations, and offers flexibility for manual interventions, ensuring minimal business disruption during migration.

Nutanix Move is a key tool for organizations migrating virtual machines to Acropolis Hypervisor from VMware or Hyper-V. Users benefit from its ability to transfer between hypervisors and its support for physical to virtual conversions. The migration process is fully automated, efficient, and maintains IP and MAC addresses while allowing manual adjustments. Though user-friendly and cost-effective, some enhancements, such as reverse migration support from Acropolis to Hyper-V and improved scalability for multiple simultaneous VM migrations, are needed. Users also express a need for migration tools for other Nutanix platforms and an option for direct migration from vSphere without vCenter dependency. Despite these areas for improvement, Nutanix Move efficiently supports significant data migrations and adapts to different infrastructures across availability zones.

What are Nutanix Move's key features?

Automated Migration: Streamlines migration with no downtime, retaining IP and MAC addresses.
Seamless Integration: Works well with VMware and Hyper-V for smooth transitions.
Flexible Setup: User-friendly setup process, supporting large data migrations.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Favorable pricing for extensive migration needs.
Minimal Disruption: Ensures business continuity with live migration capabilities.
Enhanced Flexibility: Supports a wide range of infrastructure transitions and availability zones.

Organizations in diverse industries use Nutanix Move to transfer virtual machines across different platforms like VMware, Hyper-V, and Acropolis Hypervisor. It supports varied setups including Nutanix, Azure, and AWS, meeting the needs for flexibility and efficient data handling in complex infrastructures.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, The Home Depot, JetBlue, Cape Coral, City of Westfield, Cloud Comrade

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Move

September 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Move

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Move and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. Nutanix Move report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.