No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson vs Remedio comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security MaaS360 with W...
Ranking in Autonomous Endpoint Management
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (7th)
Remedio
Ranking in Autonomous Endpoint Management
11th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (133rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Autonomous Endpoint Management category, the mindshare of IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson is 1.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Remedio is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Autonomous Endpoint Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson1.9%
Remedio0.3%
Other97.8%
Autonomous Endpoint Management
 

Featured Reviews

Hehic Faith - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Manager at DuPont
Centralized device control has reduced data costs and protects lost mobiles and tablets
Synchronization is a problem sometimes, and I suggest that IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson should improve by making the user interface more user-friendly. It feels pretty average, which gives a hard time for new users. It should be more user-friendly and intuitive. IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson should reduce the cost of the per-device subscription, because when you have a lot of devices like our organization has, it becomes pretty expensive to manage all the devices. It should also allow simplified device management. The cost reduction of 30 to 40% is primarily from reduced device losses, less manual work for admins, and other factors. The more devices you have to manage, the more the cost, especially because they bill per device. In our case, IBM Security MaaS360 can be a bit expensive. It could be less expensive for a small organization dealing with a few devices. The setting is slightly complicated because of the unintuitive interface.
PB
Vulnerability Management Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed remediation workflows and now cuts critical vulnerability backlogs
I would rate Remedio a nine out of ten. The reason I chose nine out of ten is that Remedio has significantly reduced the time it takes to complete my workload, but I believe there is potential for improvement, particularly with additional AI features. Regarding Remedio's AI capabilities, we definitely need to follow governance and security rules. While Remedio's AI will not provide complete accuracy, if AI features are available, users without prior knowledge can understand the process better. Remedio is deployed in a hybrid cloud environment because we use both on-premises and cloud infrastructures. We use multiple cloud platforms, including AWS, GCP, and Azure, with most of our resources currently from the AWS platform. My advice to others looking into using Remedio is that it can significantly reduce manual work and assist with reporting and creating dashboards.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson is a reliable solution for device management, security, and compliance; it provides strong centralized control and helps simplify endpoint administration, and while there is room for improvement in reporting and end-user experience, it has been a valuable platform for the organization."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has impacted my organization positively by giving us control for the cybersecurity of mobile devices, which is a very strong aspect."
"The fast deployment and profile update features of IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson have made it easier for our job and our customers' work because when it is required that an application be loaded quickly or updated, it is done quite fast compared to other MDMs."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has positively impacted my organization by being able to protect mobile devices."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson significantly reduced deployment time, improved consistency across the managed devices, and made supporting a remote workforce much easier."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson is very good in terms of security, especially in today's world in the age of AI."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has had a positive impact on my organization through mobile data cost savings."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has improved threat detection, reduced response time, and increased overall security team efficiency in my organization."
"The mean time to remediation has been reduced by almost 50%."
 

Cons

"My experience with the technical support of IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has not been very good."
"Synchronization is a problem sometimes, and I suggest that IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson should improve by making the user interface more user-friendly."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson is a strong endpoint management solution, though there is room for improvement."
"The first is the administration interface, which can feel complex, especially for new administrators."
"One thing that could improve is making the interface and navigation more intuitive in some areas."
"IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson could be improved because I noticed that the internet cycle for mobile data lasted the whole month, whereas without this software, it lasted less than a month's cycle, usually around 15 days before users' mobile data ran out."
"One area IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson can be improved is that once a device is lost, I have to continue to pay for the license, which should be looked upon and configured otherwise."
"Overall, IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson is a good solution, but there could be more integrations with third-party cybersecurity tools available out of the box."
"I would suggest adding more AI-related features to help new users understand how to access the console."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Autonomous Endpoint Management solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
31%
Retailer
24%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
33%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Healthcare Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise16
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson, we use a subscription model for pricing, which is very convenient and easy to understand on a m...
What needs improvement with IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson?
While IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has been a reliable endpoint management solution, I think there are a few areas where it could be improved. The first is the administration interface, which c...
What is your primary use case for IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson?
My primary use case for IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson has been to centralize, manage, and secure all corporate-owned and BYOD mobile devices across the organization while ensuring compliance wit...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Ivanti, Tanium and others in Autonomous Endpoint Management. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.