No Magic MagicDraw vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

iGrafx and Dassault Systèmes are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. iGrafx is ranked #18, while Dassault Systèmes is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5. iGrafx holds a 2.9% mindshare in BPD, compared to Dassault Systèmes’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of iGrafx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dassault Systèmes users who would recommend it.

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

4,036 Views
1,937 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

2,905 Views
2,702 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

No Magic MagicDraw

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and No Magic MagicDraw compete in business process management and modeling software. While iGrafx excels in process optimization, MagicDraw has superior modeling capabilities and integration features that appeal to complex projects.

Features:iGrafx Process360 Live offers process documentation, simple tools for business transformation, and optimization capabilities. No Magic MagicDraw supports UML, SysML, and BPMN modeling, provides integration with other tools, and offers extensive API support.

Room for Improvement:iGrafx could enhance modeling complexity, integrate more advanced APIs, and support more comprehensive technical environments. MagicDraw could improve ease of use, reduce its pricing for broader appeal, and streamline initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:iGrafx offers cloud-based deployment focusing on user onboarding and simplicity. No Magic MagicDraw provides desktop and server configurations requiring more technical expertise but includes comprehensive professional support. iGrafx is easier to set up, while MagicDraw effectively supports complex environments.

Pricing and ROI:iGrafx offers competitive pricing with lower initial costs and a quicker ROI for businesses seeking efficient process management. MagicDraw requires a higher upfront investment to reflect its advanced modeling features and integration options, offering justified ROI for in-depth modeling projects.

To learn more, read our detailed No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Business Process Design

18th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (30th), Process Mining (16th)

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 2.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
No Magic MagicDraw	2.4%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	2.9%
Other	94.7%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We found the technical support to be helpful."

"The IDEF0 add-on solution truly integrates all the process maps through intelligent arrow name management."

"One of the biggest plus points of the product stems from the fact that I have never seen any glitches in it."

"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."

"The solution is very stable."

"It has increased accountability by providing defined documentation ownership."

"Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use."

"The solution's most beneficial feature is the 360 approach, where documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities are in one solution."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

"There is a lot of documentation available on the Internet to understand its functionality."

"I alone can maintain all architecture documentation for a larger project as well as for one or two selected systems."

"I think one of the key things is the plugins for integration with requirements management tools like Doors"

"The initial setup was not straightforward."

"The most valuable features are the visibility, standard compliance, and interface."

"The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors."

"The most valuable feature of No Magic MagicDraw is the simulation capabilities and interface."

"I would rate MagicDraw a nine out of ten because of the price. Enterprise Architect has a lot of bugs and MagicDraw is a lot more accurate and flexible. It's a level better."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

Cons

"One of the areas in the product with certain shortcomings where improvements are required includes the tool's reporting capabilities."

"I used the single license product. The entire suite can manage complex organizations, linking it with ERP, but it is not so easy to link it to a new ERP."

"It can be more user-friendly."

"Visio is more user-friendly."

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

"They can reduce the cost of the product and make it easily accessible for consultants."

"I would like to see a lower price, although when used correctly, you can have a good return on your investment."

"The price could be more competitive."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

"Some of No Magic MagicDraw's most valuable features were its integration with other simulation tools, such as MATLAB, the seasonal plugin, and the Rangel simulation toolkit."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect."

"The documentation for MagicDraw and the video tutorials compared to other competitors is an area for improvement."

"It's very focused on specific modern languages and it doesn't do necessarily general systems software engineering with diagrams. They should expand the diagram types for the languages."

"It would be better if the User Interface were updated. At the moment, it's a classic environment. It reminds me of the old Windows interface, for example, Windows 95. It would be better to make it more user-friendly. It would also be better if it could integrate with SAP solutions. It isn't easy to find experts in the field. It's hard to find people around the globe that have the necessary skills and expertise to manage this solution. For example, in our case, we needed someone with refrigeration knowledge that also knew how to use the tool, and that was a challenge. We also had issues relating to erasing. Sometimes, it kept it in the background and didn't erase it at all. We had to review the entire list to ensure that the item was deleted."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect."

"For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things."

"The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

See all answers

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Appian vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 17% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 11% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

IBM System Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 6% of the time

Lucidchart vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 6% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

October 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

October 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Also Known As

No data available

MagicDraw

Overview

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform integrates IDEF0, supports Lean Six Sigma, and offers comprehensive process modeling, making it a versatile choice for industry-specific needs including risk assessment and enterprise object usage.

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is known for its capabilities in streamlining workflows, process mining, and scenario simulation. While it simplifies the complexities of BPMN, and provides powerful tools for workflow plotting, documentation, and simulation, it faces challenges in ease of linking with new ERP systems, web modeling complexity, and costs. The platform offers predefined templates for easy process creation, yet it lacks depth in reporting tools and has limited multi-language support which could be improved for broader usability.

What are the key features of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

IDEF0 Integration: Simplifies process analysis using structured graphical representation.
Lean Six Sigma Support: Enhances efficiency and quality management through integration with Six Sigma methodologies.
Process Simulation: Enables scenario testing to optimize workflows.
BPMN Capabilities: Provides tools for clear representation of business workflows.
KPI Integration: Monitors key performance indicators for continuous improvement.
Collaboration Features: Facilitates teamwork and collaboration during process development.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

Streamlined Workflows: Efficiently manages and optimizes business processes.
Robust Analysis: Offers deep insights into process performance for decision-making.
Process Mining: Identifies inefficiencies and potential improvements within workflows.
Versatile Application: Suitable for industries like banking and service modeling.

Many industries utilize iGrafx Process360 Live Platform for business process modeling, analysis, and management. It is extensively applied in banking for risk assessment, utilizing its BPM capabilities to adhere to ISO 9000 standards. Service-oriented companies use its process design and repository functions for effective process mining and management, making it a valuable tool in managing complex organizational structures.

iGrafx

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

Sample Customers

Multinational Bank

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

September 2026

Free Report: No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our No Magic MagicDraw vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.