No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Traceable AI comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Imperva Application Securit...
Ranking in API Security
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
147
Ranking in other categories
CDN (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (1st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (3rd), Bot Management (1st)
Traceable AI
Ranking in API Security
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Imperva Application Security Platform is 9.3%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Traceable AI is 2.9%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Imperva Application Security Platform9.3%
Traceable AI2.9%
Other87.8%
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2818155 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Application protection has improved and reporting and dashboards still need refinement
I believe Imperva Application Security Platform should have a more interactive wizard. While the dashboard is good, it could be more eye-catching. Based on my perspective, I recommend modifying the dashboards, especially the main dashboard where I can see the traffic hit count, alerts, and other latest information. In terms of reporting, I find it challenging to create reports; in my earlier days, it was difficult. Over time, I have learned how to create reports, but it should be easier to do so. I have used other tools such as firewalls or SolarWinds, where creating a report is straightforward and does not take much time, unlike in Imperva, where I have to add many elements. Modifications in the integration aspects would also be beneficial.
DipanjanDhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Quality Assurance Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Improved API data protection and threat detection have reduced manual work but reporting still needs refinement
The documents for the initial setup are very limited, making us rely heavily on the vendor to install the setup, which can be costly. Each license costs a lot for our organization, and while we placed a few licenses in a confidential project, using it broadly requires more licenses, which is not financially feasible. Proper training is also crucial; we spent around two and a half years in a UAT environment to train the AI to understand our organization's policies before deploying it in production. While this approach has worked smoothly, we identified a need for better and more user-friendly reporting. If we discuss national IDs, different countries have different national ID formats. Whenever we install Traceable AI, we need to inject our own configurations for the national IDs of various countries. If they use a real-time social security number or national ID sites in the future, it would be easier for us if the process were more flexible.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features for us are the DDoS and Bot."
"As a system, it's very effective at blocking potentially malicious items."
"​Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"There is a quick switch between any of the the nodes if something goes wrong, where there's a there's an attack against a specific area. The security setup is reasonably easy. It's not a problem to do setups and rules and integrations. And, yeah, just the the back end team is also very willing to insist if there's questions that that we cannot answer or with these questions that we do have"
"The technical support is excellent."
"Overall, I am really happy with this solution."
"There is no need to have an appliance in house for the services because it is on the cloud."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall is a highly stable solution and is very mature."
"We have seen a return on investment from Traceable AI due to improvements in accuracy and security, as it enhances our legal processes, reduces human intervention, and has shortened the time spent gathering data from three to four weeks to one to two days, which translates into direct and indirect benefits."
 

Cons

"Its user interface could be improved, as the competition looks better, but it doesn’t really need improvements in its functionality."
"I don't really use it and therefore can't speak to areas of improvement."
"Some of the features should be included in the next release is a file integrating monitoring tool. This feature should be improved."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall is a good system, but we found that the visibility of the diverse-path server, e.g. where the traffic is coming from, the different IPs, etc., needs improvement."
"Pricing can be improved, as it is quite expensive."
"Improve reporting interface and filtering."
"It would be nice to have more security control over mobile applications so I would suggest adding more mobile security features. It would also be beneficial to see improvements in regards to interface bandwidth performance, CPU time, and RAM size. Learning capability of the device is quite weak."
"The initial setup could be simplified. Every time you have to install the solution you have to get in touch with support or somebody that can to do that for you."
"The documents for the initial setup are very limited, making us rely heavily on the vendor to install the setup, which can be costly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing can range from one to twenty thousand dollars annually. Additionally, some features, including software support, require an annual subscription as well."
"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
"The license is on a yearly basis."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"The cost is on par with other solutions such as Cloudflare and Akamai."
"Imperva Web Application Firewall is expensive."
"The tool's pricing is good."
"Make sure you understand the way that Imperva charges. It's very affordable. However, I would like to see a package with the Virtual Patching included. You get to do patching separately."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Non Profit
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business88
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise70
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provided. I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap a...
What needs improvement with Imperva DDoS?
I would like to see improvements in the pooling of threats and attacks, possibly to enlarge the scale of indicators of compromise. For example, the initiation of an attack on the endpoint level cou...
What needs improvement with Traceable AI?
Traceable AI can be improved on various platforms. It is a strong API security platform but there are areas for improvement such as AI explanations for why a request was flagged, more out-of-the-bo...
What is your primary use case for Traceable AI?
Traceable AI is implemented for integration and API security where we can use various benefits. We are building .NET microservices exposing REST APIs to web and mobile clients. As the number of API...
What advice do you have for others considering Traceable AI?
Traceable AI supports enterprise workloads and can scale to large API ecosystems. However, achieving that scale required proper infrastructure planning, policy management, and ongoing tuning. It is...
 

Also Known As

Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.
Bullish, Bluevolt, Canon, Ethos, FalconX, Houzwer, Jobvite, Outreach 
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Orca Security, Akamai and others in API Security. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.