InfoScale vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

InfoScale and PagerDuty are both solutions in the Autonomous Operational Resilience category. InfoScale is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while PagerDuty is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. InfoScale holds a 19.1% mindshare in AOR, compared to PagerDuty’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfoScale users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of PagerDuty users who would recommend it.

InfoScale

Read 9 InfoScale reviews

2,409 Views
241 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Read 104 PagerDuty Operations Cloud reviews

10,937 Views
109 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

InfoScale

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2026

PagerDuty Operations Cloud and InfoScale compete in the cloud operations management category. PagerDuty Operations Cloud has the upper hand due to its stronger incident management and comprehensive alerting system, whereas InfoScale excels in data integrity and high availability.

Features: PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers advanced incident management, multi-channel notifications, and seamless integration with monitoring tools. InfoScale provides intelligent failover and fallback mechanisms, advanced storage virtualization, and ensures high availability.

Room for Improvement: PagerDuty Operations Cloud could enhance event intelligence, lower prices for smaller teams, and improve mobile app integration. InfoScale's licensing costs are high, and the interface could be more user-friendly with updates to the graphical interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PagerDuty Operations Cloud supports public and private cloud environments with responsive customer service, though accessibility and response times could improve. InfoScale is typically deployed on-premises, focusing on reliability in large environments but may need more versatile interface options.

Pricing and ROI: PagerDuty Operations Cloud, while costly for smaller teams, offers considerable ROI with improved operational efficiency and reduced MTTR. InfoScale's high pricing limits accessibility, but it provides solid ROI in operational reliability and disaster recovery.

To learn more, read our detailed InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfoScale

Ranking in Autonomous Operational Resilience

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (25th), High Availability Clustering (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (13th), Data Storage for Kubernetes (2nd)

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Ranking in Autonomous Operational Resilience

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

104

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (1st), AIOps (3rd), Critical Event Management (CEM) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Autonomous Operational Resilience category, the mindshare of InfoScale is 19.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PagerDuty Operations Cloud is 10.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Autonomous Operational Resilience Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PagerDuty Operations Cloud	10.2%
InfoScale	19.1%
Other	70.7%

Autonomous Operational Resilience

Featured Reviews

TABISH JAVED

Site Reliability Engineer (Certified) at Kyndryl India

Automated recovery has minimized downtime and supports seamless multi‑datacenter failover

Beyond pricing, there are areas where I would like to see InfoScale improved or enhanced. Veritas offers three management approaches. The first, which Veritas currently recommends, is Veritas Operation Manager. The second is the Cluster Manager Java Console graphical interface. The Cluster Manager Java Console has not been revised since version 6.1 or 6.2. This tool was critical for me, particularly valuable when managing small cluster footprints of 20 to 30 server nodes. I relied heavily on this tool, but Veritas has moved away from it in favor of Operation Manager. I recommend Veritas continue evolving this tool rather than discarding it. The third approach is the command line, suitable for individuals with extensive Veritas expertise and experience, but command line use in live environments consumed excessive time, leading me to prefer the graphical interface. Apart from pricing, I have not discovered disadvantages. The product is excellent. My concern is Veritas discarding the Cluster Manager Java Console in favor of Veritas Operation Manager. Setting up Operation Manager requires time and a dedicated server that runs continuously. I had to create a single server just for Veritas Operation Manager. While this works well for larger environments with hundreds of clusters, it is less useful for smaller deployments. I still recommend Veritas reconsider this application and evolve it by incorporating new features from Veritas Operation Manager. Adding these new features to the Java console would be beneficial because that tool runs on my laptop without consuming environment resources, and I can connect directly to clusters from my laptop. I am not opposing Veritas Operation Manager, which is excellent and resembles hardware management consoles for power machines, but smaller tools that previously performed these tasks should remain as options to provide clients with greater ease. From a features and functionality perspective, I do not find missing features in InfoScale at this moment. However, I am not actively using Veritas, managing only legacy machines on older hardware. I am upgrading operating systems but not Veritas due to contract expiration and end-of-life status. The contract is not being renewed because the customer wants to move away. Since I have not logged into VCS since 2021 and transferred responsibilities to another team, I am unaware of features arriving in version 8 or beyond and cannot comment specifically on recent Veritas introductions.

Read full review

reviewer2879727

Cloud Dev Ops Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified incident response has reduced alert noise and improves on-call focus and coordination

PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its noise reduction by making deduplication and suppression more automated instead of manually tuned, and the service dependency graph could be more intuitive with cleaner visuals and easier-to-understand root cause tracing during major incidents. Automation could go further with smarter runbook triggers and AI-driven suggestions to help find root causes, which could save a lot of time for engineers who are struggling to understand what is actually happening. These AI capabilities could lower the time by maybe 50–60%. Analytics and reporting could be more flexible, allowing custom dashboards and filters and team-level MTTA and MTTR breakdowns, so that it is segregated based on teams and it is much easier to have custom dashboards for the teams to understand more. Alert storms were a recurring frustration for the on-call team, and escalation overrides and service dependency graphs can get a bit confusing in larger environments. More customizable analytics and smarter automation would make the platform even easier, more flexible and more powerful for the team to understand. PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve its analytics flexibility with customized dashboards and AI capabilities to be more trained and more reliable. Service dependency mapping can also feel cluttered in big environments, making it harder to trace upstream and downstream impacts during bigger incidents. We implemented PagerDuty Operations Cloud's AI to help with alert grouping and early incident insights, but accuracy was not consistent enough to rely on during critical events. It occasionally grouped unrelated alerts or missed correlations, which limited the operational efficiency gains we expected. The on-call team still depended heavily on manual triage because AI suggestions were not always aligned with the real root cause. Overall, AI added some value but it has not yet reached the reliability needed to significantly improve the incident response efficiency. It needs more training or more work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature in InfoScale is the file system, which is the greatest feature as you can get any storage LUN from any hardware because it's software-defined and create a volume that can consist of storage from two or more different vendors, which avoids any vendor lock-in and makes it easier when you expand as time goes."

"It offers High Availability for many applications, including Oracle and SAP environment."

"It integrates well with other solutions."

"The best feature is that it supports high availability and automatic failover, which minimizes downtime and helps the environment reduce downtime and improve high availability for critical applications."

"In a live incident scenario, the data replication process occurs in real-time, and compared to other products, this data replication feature works effectively, ensuring data availability, and we can implement this scenario using Veritas Volume Replication (VVR), which is the most usable feature in InfoScale for data replication."

"Over the last two years, we did not experience any application failover or receive alerts due to the immediate switchover mechanism in active-active mode that ensures no downtime, helping us significantly with confidence and trust in our organization."

"InfoScale's ability to maintain data integrity and availability during a cyber event such as a ransomware attack is excellent."

"It's a stable solution."

More InfoScale pros

"It is a great product for routing tickets and alerts, so it saves invaluable time."

"Our company has already achieved ROI because different tools can alert to a single system and that is very efficient."

"The alerts are immediate in this solution, which allows us to respond to errors quickly."

"PagerDuty's best features are the dedicated application that allows me to reach my engineers immediately and the ability to directly assign specific tasks to individuals and have them report back."

"PagerDuty has replaced that ability to contact somebody in case of emergency without fail."

"Now, we don't have to think about it; we can simply set it up in PagerDuty and it works, with the escalation and everything still functioning reliably based on the configuration we set up six months to one year ago."

"The incident response feels noticeably faster, with the team getting alerts sooner and able to start investigating right away, helping us avoid delays and reduce the impact of production issues."

"I see PagerDuty Operations Cloud as a very good incident management and on-call platform, mostly used by large-scale organizations because it comes with premium pricing, but it is very reliable with alerting and on-call scheduling, triggering incidents, escalation policies, rules, and runbooks."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pros

Cons

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go for it anyways."

"The primary concern is licensing cost, as the customer is unwilling to invest further and has begun cost-cutting measures."

"While InfoScale is mainly used by enterprise-level customers, it does not inherently support many applications, which presents a scalability issue."

"It could be more stable and more secure."

"Many customers can see the benefit of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to purchase the product because the license cost is very high."

"It's very difficult to implement."

"Many customers can see the benefits of InfoScale, but they are usually not able to buy the products and solutions because of the licensing costs."

"Based on my experience with support, I would rate them a nine, only because occasionally the first person I talk to does not know more than I do and it needs to be escalated to reach someone more knowledgeable."

More InfoScale cons

"The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for teams managing multiple services, escalation policies, and integrations."

"We have seen some inconsistencies with receiving alerts on an iPhone versus an Android device from time to time."

"They need to sort out the date / time function when the time zones switch over from Normal to Daylight savings, and vise versa."

"They faced an issue where we could create a report from PagerDuty Operations Cloud. The report generation accordingly faced a limitation; for instance, we encountered issues with reports generated in the morning that only showed data until four a.m."

"More analytics can be brought into PagerDuty Operations Cloud; while I know there are some, they still seem basic to me, and having options for user-customized charts would be really helpful, especially in this GenAI world where prompts can yield valuable data."

"If I can avoid the 2 AM phone calls that would be perfect but I know that's not possible."

"One way PagerDuty Operations Cloud could improve is through the scheduling feature, which can be tricky, especially with complex schedules."

"PagerDuty Operations Cloud itself is costly, limiting adoption across all organizations."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our clients pay for licensing on a yearly basis."

"If we wanted phone calls or additional SMSs, we would have to pitch up for those. They give us so many per month per user, then we have to pay extra if it goes over that."

"They're very good in pricing compared to the competitors in the area. I would rate them a five out of five in terms of pricing."

"The cost is quite high. But if you want to get a full-featured application and you have a big team..."

"PagerDuty has monthly and yearly licenses available, the costs of which can get quite high if you have a large number of users."

"The price is very high."

"There is a license needed to use PagerDuty."

"If you add more people, then you have to pay more, which is always a thing with the SaaS solutions."

"The cost is based on the package you select."

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Autonomous Operational Resilience solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	80

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit expensive, but rather than that, because it is used in critical environments with no competitor, most of the customers go f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas InfoScale Availability?

InfoScale can be improved if it added more robust reporting features; it has reporting, but it is very simple. If it created an integration with a reporting tool that makes it official, customers c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas InfoScale Availability?

My main use case for InfoScale is that we use it in many scenarios. In some scenarios, we use it for clustering for a product like Enterprise Vault, using InfoScale Enterprise, where we handle the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PagerDuty?

Pricing is good and not too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PagerDuty?

One area I would like to see improved is making complex alerts configuration and routing rules easier to set up and manage. PagerDuty Operations Cloud's flexibility is useful, but some advanced con...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PagerDuty?

I primarily use PagerDuty Operations Cloud for managing incidents and monitoring all critical services on our application. I rely on it most for real-time alerts, automated incident routing, on-cal...

See all answers

Comparisons

Windows Server Failover Clustering vs InfoScale

Compared 11% of the time

IBM PowerHA System Mirror vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Platform Computing LSF vs InfoScale

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Serviceguard vs InfoScale

Compared 8% of the time

More InfoScale Competitors

xMatters vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Opsgenie vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk On-Call vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

BigPanda vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More PagerDuty Operations Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale

October 2026

Download InfoScale product report

Buyer's Guide

PagerDuty Operations Cloud

October 2026

Download PagerDuty Operations Cloud product report

Also Known As

Veritas InfoScale Availability, Arctera InfoScale for Kubernetes

No data available

Overview

InfoScale delivers robust data availability and protection for enterprises by managing critical workloads across hybrid cloud environments, ensuring minimal downtime and seamless performance.

InfoScale is designed to enhance data resilience and operational efficiency. By enabling quick data access across hybrid infrastructures, it reduces potential downtime and enhances business continuity. Its scalable architecture adapts to dynamic workloads, providing reliable performance under pressure while maintaining seamless integration with cloud-based solutions.

What are the key features of InfoScale?

Data Resiliency: Ensures continuous data availability through advanced clustering and replication technologies.
Scalability: Supports dynamic scaling to meet changing demands without compromising performance.
Cloud Integration: Offers seamless transition and operation within cloud environments.
Automated Operations: Streamlines management processes with automation to reduce manual intervention.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Uptime: Improved reliability translates to reduced business interruption.
Cost Efficiency: Potentially lowers operational costs through optimized resource allocation.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection measures for critical data assets.
Operational Agility: Facilitates swift adaptation to evolving business requirements.

InfoScale is particularly effective in sectors such as healthcare and finance where data integrity and uptime are crucial. Its implementation empowers industries to handle data-intensive operations efficiently, ensuring continuity and compliance with industry standards.

InfoScale

PagerDuty Operations Cloud focuses on efficient incident management, featuring advanced alert and notification systems, mobile alerts, and AI-driven functionalities that facilitate streamlined on-call schedules and integrations with major monitoring tools.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud offers comprehensive incident management with real-time alerts and notifications via mobile, SMS, and calls. This empowers teams to respond swiftly and reduce missed incidents. Efficient on-call management through automated scheduling and escalation enhances team productivity, while AI-driven alert grouping minimizes noise. Integration with tools like AWS and Datadog further streamlines operations.

What are the key features of PagerDuty Operations Cloud?

Real-time Incident Alerts: Improves response times by ensuring immediate notifications.
AI-driven Alert Grouping: Minimizes noise for enhanced focus and efficiency.
Automated Scheduling: Streamlines on-call management and escalation.
Monitoring Tool Integration: Seamlessly works with tools like AWS and Datadog.
Mobile Alerts: Enables SMS and call notifications for instant communication.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational burden through automation.
Improved Team Productivity: Lowers incident noise and accelerates resolution.
Enhanced Customization: Tailors alert prioritization and escalation policies.
Time Savings: Expedites incident management and reduces error rates.

PagerDuty Operations Cloud implementation spans industries like e-commerce and IT services, where it automates anomaly detection and manages high-severity incidents. Its integration capabilities and AIOps features significantly enhance incident management, proving valuable for sectors demanding real-time performance and responsiveness.

PagerDuty

Sample Customers

Wayne State University, Zenith Mart

40% of the Fortune 100 TrustPagerDuty. Customers include: Slack, Intuit, Zendesk, Panasonic, Pinterest, Airbnb, eHarmony, McKesson, Comcast

Buyer's Guide

InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfoScale vs. PagerDuty Operations Cloud report.

See our list of best Autonomous Operational Resilience vendors.

We monitor all Autonomous Operational Resilience reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.