

Veracode and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in the security domain, focusing on application security and endpoint management, respectively. While Veracode excels in addressing code vulnerabilities, Ivanti stands out with its robust automation and endpoint oversight capabilities.
Features: Veracode is known for its static and dynamic scanning features, providing deep insights into code vulnerabilities and enabling a thorough security risk review. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management offers real-time device monitoring, centralized management, and AI-driven automation to manage endpoints efficiently.
Room for Improvement: Veracode needs enhancement in reducing false positives, improving scan times, and simplifying its user interface. Users also desire better support for various programming languages. Ivanti users suggest that a more intuitive user interface, ease of navigation, and enhanced integration capabilities would improve the user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode supports deployment in private, public, and hybrid cloud environments, while Ivanti ensures seamless deployment across varied settings. Veracode receives mixed reviews for its customer support, appreciated for knowledgeability but cited for delayed responses. Ivanti's customer service is effective, though users note that dashboard complexity can be an issue for newcomers.
Pricing and ROI: Veracode is perceived as expensive, challenging for smaller businesses, though justified by enhanced security benefits for larger firms. Ivanti is generally mid- to high-range priced, potentially costly for smaller businesses but delivering good ROI through operational efficiencies.
The number of tickets for our IT team has drastically reduced, which saves time, increases productivity, and allows the IT team to focus on essential tasks rather than minor issues with employee devices.
We can remove or add licenses according to business requirements, and it is all controlled within the application.
The client was already paying for Microsoft Intune and was able to decommission Ivanti Neurons for UEM.
The scanners of Veracode bring status of the weaknesses in the current infrastructure. It scans and provides reports regarding the servers, the network, and the applications running on those servers.
Regarding price, the evaluation should focus on how efficiently they will recover their investment, considering the time saved through the use of Veracode Fix, for example, and the ability to fix code at dev time compared to the problems faced when fixing after the product is already deployed.
We did see a return on investment with Veracode, as we segregated our remediation efforts, which reduced our time to delivery as well as the number of engineers needed to help us in delivering a secure solution.
From a support perspective, they are fantastic, usually very good at getting back to us in a timely manner.
I am concerned about consistently needing to call support for installing brand new solutions.
They are responsive, stick to time, and are enthusiastic about helping.
Access to the engineering team is crucial for faster feedback on the product fix process.
I have communicated with the technical support of Veracode a couple of times, and this was a really great experience because these professionals know their material.
They share detailed information via email, including screenshots or further clarification about the issue.
Transitioning from low to high capacity in seconds.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten.
There is no limitation in scalability; Ivanti Neurons for MDM is very scalable.
Cloud solutions are easier to scale than on-premise solutions.
It has a good capacity to scale effectively.
Implementing these features into our normal CI/CD was good, so I can say that scalability is really good.
We have not seen any downtime.
Regarding the self-healing capabilities, I would say it has reduced downtime by around thirty to forty percent.
It delivers very good UEM capabilities.
If the Veracode server is down, we experience many issues during the scan.
I have observed that it is not that reliable in terms of security because Veracode was not able to find some security threats in our application that existed since the product was developed.
It's not that easy to onboard, but once they have been onboarded on the platform, and the pipeline configured alongside the product configured, it works effectively.
It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.
In an enterprise environment, while automation is powerful, strong guardrails, approval workflows, and clear audit trails, along with rollback capabilities and the ability to control the scope of automated actions, are essential.
In Cherwell, we receive an overall average rating based on the tickets worked on, which I find missing in Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management.
If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly.
We had issues with scanning large applications. Scanning took a lot of time, so we kept it outside the DevOps pipeline to avoid delaying deployments.
A nice addition would be if it could be extended for scenarios with custom cleansers.
This is not a cheap solution.
Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.
Pricing, setup cost, and licensing are on the high side.
It's not the most expensive solution.
Overall, Veracode's pricing is lower and more scalable than many alternatives in the market.
If there's a security gap, you'll never know the cost or effect.
The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.
It integrates into InTune, which enables us to detect, diagnose, and fix issues without manual intervention.
AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work.
It offers confidence by preventing exposure to vulnerabilities and helps ensure that we are not deploying vulnerable code into production.
The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins.
It fixes issues directly in the IDE while you're doing it.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 70 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 46 |
| Large Enterprise | 114 |
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.
What are the most important features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.
Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.
Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.
What are the key features of Veracode?
What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?
Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.
Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.
We monitor all Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.