MANTA Flow vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Manta and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Manta is ranked #37, while Microsoft is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Manta holds a 0.9% mindshare in DG, compared to Microsoft’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Manta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

MANTA Flow

Read 2 MANTA Flow reviews

1,110 Views
1,110 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Read 22 Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

4,974 Views
3,382 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MANTA Flow

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Microsoft Purview Information Protection and MANTA Flow are prominent in the data security and management category. The comprehensive features and capabilities of MANTA Flow give it a competitive edge due to its superior data governance strengths.

Features: Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers comprehensive data classification, labeling, and protection for sensitive data. Its capabilities ensure robust safeguards for data privacy. MANTA Flow presents superior data lineage features, detailed data flow tracking, and extensive compliance enhancement attributes. These capabilities effectively support data governance, enabling users to manage data environments efficiently while adhering to regulatory requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers seamless cloud-based deployment, supported by extensive integrations, facilitating easy organizational implementation. Its customer service supports smooth deployment. MANTA Flow requires a more complex setup but provides a tailored customer service experience, which allows personalized user support but can prolong the deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Information Protection provides competitive pricing options with scalable plans, enhancing ROI by meeting various organizational needs. MANTA Flow's higher initial cost is justified by its feature depth, offering significant long-term ROI through improved data compliance and governance, reflecting the value beyond initial investment.

To learn more, read our detailed MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MANTA Flow

Ranking in Data Governance

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Ranking in Data Governance

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Privacy Management Software (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of MANTA Flow is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is 1.9%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Information Protection	1.9%
MANTA Flow	0.9%
Other	97.2%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

LeandroSodré

Data Governance Analyst at Data Meaning, Inc.

Very Powerful, with cloud based scalability, and highly efficient for both business and technical teams

I had some difficulties, trying to use the direct link which is metadata through files that you can upload to MANTA Flow and you can just say from there where that data is going. But we just figured out that sometimes, depending on the level of the granularity that if you want to link the object, you can not. For example, if you want to link the objects just by schema, sometimes it does not work. So you need to scroll down and link each table. Sometimes the table level does not work, and you need to go deeper and go to link column to column. We figured out that this was a bug in MANTA Flow, and we talked to them and I think they were fixing it. But in our case, we just realized that if we could link the objects at the lowest level possible, it would work. I was trying to develop, right now, some kind of automation to compare the listed revision that I have in MANTA Flow with some other revision. And I would like to do it in an automatic way. I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface. I think it would be very powerful because if you want to automate just warn the data owners the structures were updated by looking at the object level, and send an email to these owners to see if that change makes sense.

Read full review

Abhi T

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Achieve comprehensive data protection with reliable performance and room for enhanced discovery accuracy

The product is still in a growing phase. I could see that many use cases in their product are not capable enough in terms of detecting or protecting. Compared to other products, they are in the middle of bringing their solution up to the mark, so it is not a full-grown solution. They have to get more accurate results in terms of data discovery and classification. The second thing is their support; support from Microsoft takes a lot of time to get a response from their support team. The third thing is their OCR capability is not that great in terms of identifying the documents. We would love to see response times of less than 24 hours. Additionally, there is no way to check the policy's current status in terms of whether it got synced or not. You have to wait and test the use cases after 24 hours or after 48 hours, and once it starts working, then it appears the policy got implemented.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I believe it is very powerful. And for technicians, you can see the impact analysis, you can compare versions. So you can see some revisions against some of the oldest ones. You can compare and see which pipelines were updated between them. I think it is very helpful to both sides, the technical and business teams."

"The solution is stable. We have not found any fatal errors yet."

"Technical support works well, they resolve issues."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is its ability to respond to sensitive data shared on Teams chat by deleting the message, not just monitoring or logging."

"The simplicity of the way we can configure the DLP rules in Microsoft Purview Information Protection is good."

"The features my clients request most are sensitivity labels and data loss prevention. Additionally, I am trying to interest them in risk management and insider risk management, although those features are considered more advanced."

"I recommend Microsoft Purview Information Protection for organizations using the Microsoft ecosystem."

"Incorporating data loss prevention capabilities built into the Microsoft platform to endpoints, such as Windows 10 and Windows 11 computers, can also help prevent data loss and is highly advantageous."

"Purview is about auditing and discoverability. We need to ensure people aren't releasing information that they shouldn't and that they're doing multi-factor authentication or accessing it from the correct devices. It aids in reducing silos within organizations, enabling staff to easily find documents and contacts without exhausting human resources."

"My favorite feature about Microsoft Purview Information Protection is how it applies to everything generally, so I don't have to do it manually."

"My advice to other organizations considering this product is that it is best in the business if you are a heavy Microsoft shop."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection pros

Cons

"One area of improvement for MANTA Flow is to add as many new data sources as possible. We have found that maybe they can support 100, but not 101, unfortunately."

"I would like to have some kind of API where I could call this object and the revision that I want and the same object and another revision that I wanted to compare with. And I could not see it as some API in MANTA Flow, and we have this feature on the user interface."

"I would like the time it takes to update a DLP policy on an endpoint to be reduced."

"I see many options such as SharePoint Advanced Management for customers, but that requires a high investment from the customer's end in order to access the premium features of Purview, so it is not easy."

"A lot of functionality in Microsoft Purview Information Protection is not exposed in an API officially yet, which has made a lot of implementation work difficult because we have to do click ops instead of DevOps."

"Most of the capabilities they mention are not working as expected. That is where the challenge lies."

"In my opinion, Microsoft Purview Information Protection can be improved by having a more seamless user experience and ease of use in protecting both structured and unstructured data."

"We don't trust Microsoft Purview Information Protection yet."

"There is room for improvement with the policy tips feature."

"I rate Microsoft support six out of 10. Response times are a challenge. It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a service company, we don't care about the price because the customer is paying, but the customers consider MANTA to be reasonable."

"Initially, Purview's cost seemed quite high because it was for personal use. I was scanning a tiny tenant and thinking, "If I extrapolate this to an enterprise-scale tenant, it will be quite costly." However, I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started. At least, Purview has a free trial, so you can try some of the features early on."

"The pricing and setup costs are transferred to my clients, who find it affordable and are satisfied with what they receive."

"The tool's pricing is fairly low, less than 100,000 for a year."

"The price is determined by the enterprise licensing, either the E3 or E5 licensing or the EMS plus security and other feature licensing."

"The tool's pricing is not a problem for customers because they often purchase it as part of a bundle. With an E5 license, for example, users get access to the entire functionality. This is one of the main reasons why many customers are choosing Microsoft."

"The product is affordable, and our clients agree. Sensitivity labels come with the MIP license at an additional $2 a month per user, an excellent deal for auto-labeling capabilities."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

It is reasonable from what I can say right now because we are using most of the Microsoft tools right now. We are using the managed SQL server of Microsoft. We are using Microsoft Purview Informati...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

In my opinion, Microsoft Purview Information Protection can be improved by having a more seamless user experience and ease of use in protecting both structured and unstructured data.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

My main use case for using Microsoft Purview Information Protection is protecting our unstructured files.

See all answers

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs MANTA Flow

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs MANTA Flow

Compared 18% of the time

Atlan vs MANTA Flow

Compared 8% of the time

Quest Data Intelligence vs MANTA Flow

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MANTA Flow

Compared 6% of the time

More MANTA Flow Competitors

Google Knowledge Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Mimecast Data Compliance and Governance vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

September 2026

Download MANTA Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Information Protection

October 2026

Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Download Microsoft Purview Information Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Information Protection

Overview

MANTA Flow is a data lineage platform designed to deliver insights into the data pipeline, enhancing transparency and improving decision-making for data-heavy organizations.

It efficiently maps out and visualizes data flow across complex environments, allowing companies to trace data origin, transformation, and destination. With its robust analytical capabilities, MANTA Flow significantly streamlines data governance and compliance efforts, offering a detailed overview of all dependencies and potential risk factors within the data landscape.

What are the most essential features of MANTA Flow?

Automated Lineage Capture: Automatically traces data sources and transformations, reducing the need for manual documentation.
Comprehensive Visualization: Provides a clear and interactive map of data flow, making it easier to understand complex dependencies.
Impact Analysis: Assesses the effects of changes in data processes, minimizing potential risks.
Regulatory Compliance Facilitation: Aids in adhering to data governance policies by offering thorough lineage records.
Multi-Environment Support: Manages data lineage across diverse platforms, centralizing insights.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved Data Reliability: Enhances data integrity by ensuring transparency in data processing.
Time Reduction in Tracing Errors: Speeds up troubleshooting by identifying errors' root causes swiftly.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers overhead by automating lineage tasks and reducing manual labor.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Informs strategic decisions by delivering comprehensive data insights.
Scalability: Supports growth by effortlessly adapting to expanding data environments.

MANTA Flow is implemented across sectors including finance and healthcare, where tracking data lineage is crucial for meeting compliance standards. It provides tailored solutions adapting to unique industry requirements, ensuring data processing transparency and accuracy in high-stakes environments.

Manta

Microsoft Purview Information Protection offers sensitivity labels, automated classification, and encryption to protect data across platforms while integrating with M365, Azure, and AWS to prevent unauthorized access and enhance data governance.

Microsoft Purview Information Protection supports compliance with regulatory standards through features like data loss prevention and intuitive DLP rules. It integrates with multiple platforms such as M365, Azure, and AWS for extensive data protection. The platform helps manage sensitive data through automated labeling and effective policy deployment. While there are areas needing improvement like third-party integration, API support, and policy enforcement consistency, Purview remains a powerful tool for businesses to assess data usage and reduce unauthorized access.

What are the key features of Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

Sensitivity Labels: Facilitates the classification and labeling of data to safeguard sensitive information.
Automated Classification: Automatically classifies data based on content to streamline data security processes.
Encryption: Provides encryption solutions across platforms for robust data protection.
DLP Rules: Offers intuitive data loss prevention rules to minimize the risk of data breaches.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with M365, Azure, and AWS, enhancing interoperability and efficiency.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

Compliance Support: Helps organizations adhere to regulatory requirements efficiently.
Enhanced Data Security: Protects sensitive data with sensitivity labels and encryption.
Operational Efficiency: Facilitates data governance with automated labeling and reporting.
Data Loss Prevention: Minimizes unauthorized data exposure through efficient DLP rules.

Companies across various industries implement Microsoft Purview Information Protection to apply sensitivity labels to emails and cloud content like OneDrive and SharePoint. It's utilized for data classification, loss prevention, and governance. Microsoft partners use it for SAP integration and compliance assessments, while consultants focus on protecting and managing data efficiently for clients centered around Microsoft solutions.

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

September 2026

Free Report: MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MANTA Flow vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.