No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL] vs Moogsoft comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Micro Focus OpenView [EOL]
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Moogsoft
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (40th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), AIOps (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

Reviewer2892 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President of Infrastructure Management at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems
Application logs Oracle/SQL-based systems monitoring Application log monitoring. It minimizes the duration of outages and gives specific alerts to localize the problem (log monitoring). It provides proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems. Correlation Suppression methods Management…
MA
L1 Analyst at HCLTech
Effective monitoring and efficient alert management streamline operations
Machine learning works based on past collected data, so we can develop a system that functions as an automated bot using this data. With the use of AI technologies such as ChatGPT and other Gen AI solutions, if we combine these with machine learning tools, it will lead to increased efficiency and reduced processing time in application systems. I work on the backend to address any issues with Moogsoft, such as URL access problems or credential bugs, ensuring everything operates smoothly. The advantage of Moogsoft is that it consolidates various alerts into one monitoring tool, which reduces time and allows for real-time and anomaly detection, while its disadvantage includes limited built-in observability and complex setup requirements. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Moogsoft a 9.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Network Node Manager is good and so is Operations Manager, although they are a bit archaic now."
"It minimizes the duration of outages and gives specific alerts to localize the problem, providing proactivity to prevent mission-critical problems."
"It has a flexible, enterprise-scale monitoring system."
"The most valuable feature is that it is easy to use."
"A single pane of glass (one GUI to monitor health of the entire enterprise) is the holy grail of enterprise monitoring and management and HP Operations excellently provides that for applications, systems and networks."
"It supports efficiency and a speedy resolution of issues."
"It is proactive in heading off failures that would be catastrophic to the business."
"It just makes it possible for the on-call tech to relax and wait for stuff to notify them of problems instead of having to, over the weekend, constantly sign in."
"The AIOps capabilities in Moogsoft, which it brings in with multiple data source support, are the most valuable features."
"The integration with Event Management works quite well."
"Moogsoft is easily deployable and ready to use."
"One of the tangible benefits of Moogsoft AIOps is that it has reduced alert volume by 90 percent, separating the signal from the noise through mathematical analysis of all events across the entire monitoring stack and freeing up support a lot, saving resources, time, and money."
"The operations are familiar with how to use Moogsoft, so they are keeping it."
"The solution is extremely helpful with correlating IP failures and it has a very good sort of flow chart of IP systems. For example, if you see a failure in system A, you can track it down to the system causing the issue. This is a very handy feature."
"The Event Management feature is quite valuable."
"The tool's event correlation and AI are its strongest parts."
 

Cons

"The products are not plug and play even though HP has improved implementation over the years."
"With the new Operations Manager, it’s a sexier interface but it doesn’t lend itself as much to being robust."
"We would like to see support for more interfaces."
"BSM/OMi is not stable. It takes time for event dashboard to refresh."
"It is a bit expensive, but the benefit of this product compensates for its price."
"Customer Service: Average. I feel that HP don't always look after their clients as well as they could post-sale."
"The product does take considerable care and feeding especially in the later case."
"The setup was more complex than it needed to be. It required modifications for our unique circumstances at the time."
"The documentation and flexibility for generic integration could be improved."
"On a scale from one to ten, with one being worst and ten being best, I would rate Moogsoft a little lower than I expected when we originally adopted the product."
"Customer service and support need improvement in terms of response time."
"Moogsoft requires very specific system configurations, such as a particular Red Hat and Java version, which can be outdated and pose security risks."
"I would like to see additional reports or information on the dashboard that includes metrics about CPU usage and memory."
"It is taking a long time to set it up and could do more to roll out quickly."
"The unsupervised learning algorithms in Moogsoft are valuable, but the learning processes, run book creation, and neural feedback areas could be improved."
"I would like to see more integrations. It is rather difficult to install the enterprise systems with the agents."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is very good from a business impact point of view, but it's quite expensive because it's an enterprise-grade solution."
"It's a very cost-effective and competitive product."
"When compared to other solutions, it is quite good."
"As for pricing, Moogsoft recently updated their pricing model, and we're still evaluating it. It's an area where clarity is needed with the new alert-based pricing model."
"Moogsoft's licensing is consumption-based, so the price may increase depending on the environment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Moogsoft?
If you compare Moogsoft's pricing with some of the other combined solutions, they are not very cheap, but I don't think they are at the top end of the market either.
What needs improvement with Moogsoft?
I would like to see Moogsoft improve on coming up with some agentic solutions for whatever they have been able to automate.
What is your primary use case for Moogsoft?
We implement Moogsoft for our own consumption as well as we are implementation partners in some cases where our clients have a need for an observability solution.We work with most of the large ente...
 

Also Known As

HPE BTO, HPE Business Technology Optimization, HPE OpenView
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MTS India
RetailNext
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Splunk, Datadog and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.