No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server vs OpenText Dimensions CM comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Dimensions CM
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps Server is 8.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dimensions CM is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure DevOps Server8.8%
OpenText Dimensions CM2.8%
Other88.4%
Software Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

CC
Department Manager, Certification Project Management at Institute for Information Industry
Has improved project tracking and team coordination through clear visual boards
The disadvantage is the price is a problem. Because of the price, we cannot buy as many accounts as we want, so just some people in our team can use it. There are technical problems. They always change the UI in different versions, so the UI is not the same across versions. UI and integration to other systems may not be easy. For example, some shareware is built for a UNIX system, so it is not compatible with Microsoft Azure DevOps Server.
Use OpenText Dimensions CM?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Team System?
Currently, I don't see any areas for improvement or anything that could be better about Microsoft Azure DevOps Server. Perhaps some small things could be changed or some features could be added, bu...
What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Team System?
I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps Server for our developmental process. I simply use it for task creation and all, focused on daily activities. I have integrated Microsoft Azure DevOps Server with ...
What advice do you have for others considering Visual Studio Team System?
From the developers on my team, I don't hear any positive feedback about these available integrations or concerns. Everything is all right. I would give eight to nine points in general to Microsoft...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Dimensions CM, Serena Dimensions CM, Dimensions CM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bluegarden A/S, Tracasa, Rabobank Group, Borusan Otomotiv, Arelik, Alfa Bank
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH), Generali France, Raiffeisen Software, Space and Naval Warfare Information Technology Center (SPAWAR ITC), SPTS Technologies, Teamstreet
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Microsoft, Broadcom and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: October 2026.
917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.