No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nexthink vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nexthink
Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamViewer ONE
Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (18th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Patch Management (18th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Nexthink is 12.8%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 0.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nexthink12.8%
TeamViewer ONE0.7%
Other86.5%
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
 

Featured Reviews

PS
Assistant consultant at TCS
Proactive analytics have improved device performance and optimized disk space and support workflows
Nexthink offers many features, with the best being Flow, which encompasses almost everything. We have Nexthink Workspace and Spark, allowing integration with Teams so users can find solutions without going to the service desk, rectifying issues in chat. Nexthink Infinity has brought a lot of benefits to us. There has been a very good change from integration. Integrating ServiceNow with Nexthink automates problem ticket and incident generation, enabling the team to proactively know the kinds of problem statements we are receiving. For the integration with Teams, we have not completed it yet, but we are in the planning phase, and once done, we will observe the results. Nexthink has the capability of integrating with most third-party applications, which is a great feature. With the remediation actions we have in Nexthink, it has provided great self-heal capabilities along with proactiveness. By looking at the dashboards and identifying problem statements, we can share this information with the end-user computing teams to fix issues. Nexthink has significantly helped us enhance our DEX score from 74 to 80. When I talk about features that led to the improvement of our score from 74 to 80, there were earlier issues with device performance and reliability not being addressed. Noting these, we identified devices lacking free disk space and low RAM capacity contributing to high memory usage or excessive CPU usage. Disabling unnecessary startup applications brought us to a new DEX score of almost 80.
Nitesh Ranjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Real-time analytics is effective as it involves real-time monitoring for proactive issue identification."
"Overall, my experience with Nexthink is that it is great, and I have recommended it to colleagues in my previous organization."
"Nexthink has positively impacted our organization as we are diagnosing and monitoring digital scores that are lower than 20 or lower than 50."
"Nexthink has impacted my organization very positively."
"Nexthink is valuable because it's enabled us to reduce the time it takes to resolve any issues."
"The return on investment is great."
"Nexthink has helped out organizations by reducing the number of level one incidents, which has been the most beneficial outcome because we have been more proactive, contacting users and solving issues before they reach the help desk and identifying major issues before they happen."
"Overall, I would recommend Nexthink as a first priority and rate it ten out of ten."
"We are able to connect to clients who are currently not connected to the VPN, and we are also able to do direct file transfers between the technician and the client."
"The most valuable feature is the remote management capabilities."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The pricing of the solution is very reasonable."
"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."
"One of the most valuable features has been that it's a remote tool. I think this is a particularly good tool, and it's user-friendly."
"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use, and using this solution enables us to get support easily."
 

Cons

"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
"We would like better connectivity with SCCM for on-premises infrastructure and autopilot for cloud deployment."
"I find the reporting and analytics capabilities in Nexthink not really detailed, but they provide what is actually required."
"There could be improvements in monitoring user sentiments. Currently, user sentiment is not being monitored, meaning if a user faces multiple issues, their sentiments cannot be captured through the tool."
"The UI is hierarchical, which makes navigation complex and isn't user-friendly for those unfamiliar with it."
"It would be helpful if Nexthink could maintain a library for some of the standard EXEs to be named automatically."
"Nexthink still has more capabilities, and we are still struggling with new use cases because sometimes out-of-box solutions are not optimized according to our needs."
"Nexthink can improve by incorporating multiple tools."
"One of the defects that I have noticed with TeamViewer Remote Management is that if I am on a certain version and the person to whom I am connected is not on the same version, then it does not connect at times until I update the solution."
"The connectivity could improve."
"Licensing has always been a concern, as it can be costly when we need simultaneous access for multiple users."
"The main issue with the solution is the stability problem arising from network issues."
"Sometimes you need more services and need to buy more, depending on if you need it short term or long term."
"The security could be improved."
"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."
"Using the solution’s remote connection causes some lagging issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nexthink can pay for itself quickly if you identify and complete the most valuable use cases. The tool can do so much that to purely compare the price in a static way to other tools in your arsenal would be a mistake. If you do a more dynamic comparison that’s based on the overall functionality and use cases possible then it comes out cheaper. You need to consider it a relative measurement against potential use cases, size of the organization, maturity of organization, etc."
"There are certain layers when it comes to pricing. The product has three layers and these layers are associated with certain sources. For example, the top layer have the premium services and the bottom layer has the basic services."
"I have seen it help improve the user experience scores. This helped clients to save costs on another tool that they were trying to deploy in order to improve the user experience by just deploying some scripts. We were able to identify the issues and help them remediate those using our help. The process does not take much time and it provided background on end user performance. Therefore, they were able to save a lot, e.g., for approximately 50,000 endpoints at two dollars per machine per year, that is about $100,000 in savings."
"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten. The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-use."
"With this implementation of the Act and Engage module, I believe that there is a one-time fee for a two-month period, which is for the support team to make additional customizations."
"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."
"The solution relies on cloud-based infrastructure so the price is tailored to each individual model used"
"We pay for a yearly license."
"The solution's license is expensive."
"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."
"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."
"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."
"The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive. The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise47
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nexthink?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy. It was the best option when it comes to costing.
What needs improvement with Nexthink?
Nexthink has a very strong feature set, and I am still continuing to expand my experience with some of its more advanced capabilities. One area I would like to explore more deeply is Flow and the m...
What is your primary use case for Nexthink?
My main use case for Nexthink is supporting the digital employee experience and proactively identifying and resolving endpoint issues. I use it to investigate device performance, troubleshoot issue...
What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...
What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to...
What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?
I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamViewer IoT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

https://www.nexthink.com/custo...
Carey Paul Honda
Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
917,403 professionals have used our research since 2012.